Non-italic (roman) subscripts in math mode
Is there a way to set indices (subscripts) to non-italic globally? I'm aware of the case by case
X_{text{text goes here}}
But I'm having to change that across a whole document is becoming a pain.
math-mode subscripts
|
show 2 more comments
Is there a way to set indices (subscripts) to non-italic globally? I'm aware of the case by case
X_{text{text goes here}}
But I'm having to change that across a whole document is becoming a pain.
math-mode subscripts
The following is not an answer but a remark. Withtext
the font will change with the surrounding text, so it'll e.g. be italic inside a theorem environment. This is probably undesirable, so I would recommend usingtextnormal
instead.
– Circumscribe
Dec 18 '18 at 18:31
It is possible to overload_
to do this, but it might break things. Might definingnewcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
and doing a search-and-replace for_
→subtxt
be a good alternative?
– Circumscribe
Dec 18 '18 at 18:38
see e.g. tex.stackexchange.com/a/228606/2388
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 18 '18 at 18:38
@Circumscribe thanks! I'll give that a try!
– Andy Grey
Dec 18 '18 at 18:40
1
Please also confirm that really all letters in subscript positions should be rendered in upright ("roman") letters. E.g., should the lettersi
andj
inx_i
andy_j
be typeset using upright letters? Or should only groups of 2 or more, or 3 or more, letters in subscript positions be typeset using roman characters?
– Mico
Dec 18 '18 at 19:43
|
show 2 more comments
Is there a way to set indices (subscripts) to non-italic globally? I'm aware of the case by case
X_{text{text goes here}}
But I'm having to change that across a whole document is becoming a pain.
math-mode subscripts
Is there a way to set indices (subscripts) to non-italic globally? I'm aware of the case by case
X_{text{text goes here}}
But I'm having to change that across a whole document is becoming a pain.
math-mode subscripts
math-mode subscripts
edited Dec 18 '18 at 20:49
Mico
274k30370756
274k30370756
asked Dec 18 '18 at 18:09
Andy Grey
504
504
The following is not an answer but a remark. Withtext
the font will change with the surrounding text, so it'll e.g. be italic inside a theorem environment. This is probably undesirable, so I would recommend usingtextnormal
instead.
– Circumscribe
Dec 18 '18 at 18:31
It is possible to overload_
to do this, but it might break things. Might definingnewcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
and doing a search-and-replace for_
→subtxt
be a good alternative?
– Circumscribe
Dec 18 '18 at 18:38
see e.g. tex.stackexchange.com/a/228606/2388
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 18 '18 at 18:38
@Circumscribe thanks! I'll give that a try!
– Andy Grey
Dec 18 '18 at 18:40
1
Please also confirm that really all letters in subscript positions should be rendered in upright ("roman") letters. E.g., should the lettersi
andj
inx_i
andy_j
be typeset using upright letters? Or should only groups of 2 or more, or 3 or more, letters in subscript positions be typeset using roman characters?
– Mico
Dec 18 '18 at 19:43
|
show 2 more comments
The following is not an answer but a remark. Withtext
the font will change with the surrounding text, so it'll e.g. be italic inside a theorem environment. This is probably undesirable, so I would recommend usingtextnormal
instead.
– Circumscribe
Dec 18 '18 at 18:31
It is possible to overload_
to do this, but it might break things. Might definingnewcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
and doing a search-and-replace for_
→subtxt
be a good alternative?
– Circumscribe
Dec 18 '18 at 18:38
see e.g. tex.stackexchange.com/a/228606/2388
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 18 '18 at 18:38
@Circumscribe thanks! I'll give that a try!
– Andy Grey
Dec 18 '18 at 18:40
1
Please also confirm that really all letters in subscript positions should be rendered in upright ("roman") letters. E.g., should the lettersi
andj
inx_i
andy_j
be typeset using upright letters? Or should only groups of 2 or more, or 3 or more, letters in subscript positions be typeset using roman characters?
– Mico
Dec 18 '18 at 19:43
The following is not an answer but a remark. With
text
the font will change with the surrounding text, so it'll e.g. be italic inside a theorem environment. This is probably undesirable, so I would recommend using textnormal
instead.– Circumscribe
Dec 18 '18 at 18:31
The following is not an answer but a remark. With
text
the font will change with the surrounding text, so it'll e.g. be italic inside a theorem environment. This is probably undesirable, so I would recommend using textnormal
instead.– Circumscribe
Dec 18 '18 at 18:31
It is possible to overload
_
to do this, but it might break things. Might defining newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
and doing a search-and-replace for _
→ subtxt
be a good alternative?– Circumscribe
Dec 18 '18 at 18:38
It is possible to overload
_
to do this, but it might break things. Might defining newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
and doing a search-and-replace for _
→ subtxt
be a good alternative?– Circumscribe
Dec 18 '18 at 18:38
see e.g. tex.stackexchange.com/a/228606/2388
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 18 '18 at 18:38
see e.g. tex.stackexchange.com/a/228606/2388
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 18 '18 at 18:38
@Circumscribe thanks! I'll give that a try!
– Andy Grey
Dec 18 '18 at 18:40
@Circumscribe thanks! I'll give that a try!
– Andy Grey
Dec 18 '18 at 18:40
1
1
Please also confirm that really all letters in subscript positions should be rendered in upright ("roman") letters. E.g., should the letters
i
and j
in x_i
and y_j
be typeset using upright letters? Or should only groups of 2 or more, or 3 or more, letters in subscript positions be typeset using roman characters?– Mico
Dec 18 '18 at 19:43
Please also confirm that really all letters in subscript positions should be rendered in upright ("roman") letters. E.g., should the letters
i
and j
in x_i
and y_j
be typeset using upright letters? Or should only groups of 2 or more, or 3 or more, letters in subscript positions be typeset using roman characters?– Mico
Dec 18 '18 at 19:43
|
show 2 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
It is possible to overload _
to set all subscripts in roman type, but that seems like a bad idea since it might break something unexpected.
You may instead want to consider defining a macro that produces an upright subscript. I've defined such a macro (subtxt
) below.
Since it seems unlikely that you'll need underscores in math mode, I've also redefined _
to expand to subtxt
whenever it is used in math mode (and to produce an underscore otherwise, like normal).
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath} %% <- necessary for correct scaling of subscripts
begin{document}
newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
DeclareRobustCommand_{ifmmodeexpandaftersubtxtelsetextunderscorefi}
[
X_i + Xsubtxt{i} + X_i + X_{text goes here}
]
end{document}
Notes:
I'm using
textnormal
instead oftext
because the font of subscripts created with the latter command changes based on the surrounding text. You for instance probably wouldn't want all of your subscripts inside theorem environments to be in italics. See e.g. this answer for more info.I'm using
DeclareRobustCommand
to redefine_
because the original version of this macro is also defined like that. It isn't too important, but more information can be found here.
Unless you're using underscores for some other purpose in your document, you can now do a search-and-replace to change every _
into _
.
add a comment |
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
sbox0{$$}
scriptfont1=scriptfont0
$X_{abc}+y_{max}$
end{document}
Note this affects all math uses of the script size font not just subscripts.
Would that work for equation, align and other environments?
– Andy Grey
Dec 18 '18 at 19:22
@AndyGrey yes..
– David Carlisle
Dec 18 '18 at 19:24
2
What kind of sorcery issbox0{$$}
for? Just loading the math fonts?
– Werner
Dec 18 '18 at 21:35
1
@Werner latex delays finalizing the math setup until the first use of math at each font size, so that you can switch math fonts. actually for basic math atnormalsize
it probably makes no difference as things are pre-loaded, but it's a good habit to make sure...
– David Carlisle
Dec 18 '18 at 21:48
1
$x_{max}$ worksfootnote{But $X_{max}$ doesn't} and what about $x_{max}$?
– egreg
Dec 18 '18 at 22:32
|
show 5 more comments
Here's a LuaLaTeX-based solution. Subscripts enclosed by curly braces are typeset with upright ("roman") letters, as long as there's no space between the _
(underscore) character and the material enclosed in curly braces. If a subscript term is not enclosed in curly braces, e.g., $x_i$
, it's not processed by the Lua code.
If, for some reason, you do not want to the Lua function to operate on a subscript term encased in curly braces, just make sure that there are one or more spaces between _
and the subscript term. An obvious reason for wanting to suspend operation of the Lua function would be the fact that the subscript term contains math material which should be processed in math mode.
To activate operations, issue the instruction upsubOn
. To terminate them completely, execute upsubOff
.
% !TEX TS-program = lualatex
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,unicode-math}
usepackage{luacode}
%% Lua-side code:
begin{luacode}
function sub_up ( s )
return ( s:gsub ( "_(%b{})" , "_{\textnormal%1}" ) )
end
end{luacode}
%% LaTeX-side code:
newcommandupsubOn{directlua{luatexbase.add_to_callback(
"process_input_buffer" , sub_up , "subup" )}}
newcommandupsubOff{directlua{luatexbase.remove_from_callback(
"process_input_buffer" , "subup" )}}
AtBeginDocument{upsubOn} % activate the Lua function by default
begin{document}
$X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$
upsubOff
$X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$
end{document}
add a comment |
I suggest to use a different character for those subscripts. One way could be to use ?
that's very rarely used in math mode. Another uses ↓
(maybe you can find a way to type it easily).
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{newunicodechar} % for using ↓
% the main command
newcommand{uprightsubscript}[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
% this sets up the use of ?
begingrouplccode`~=`?lowercase{endgrouplet~}uprightsubscript
AtBeginDocument{mathcode`?="8000 }
% this sets up the use of ↓
newunicodechar{↓}{uprightsubscript}
textheight=2cm % just for making a smaller picture
begin{document}
$x?{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x?{max}$} and again $x?{max}$?
$x↓{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x↓{max}$} and again $x↓{max}$?
end{document}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466411%2fnon-italic-roman-subscripts-in-math-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It is possible to overload _
to set all subscripts in roman type, but that seems like a bad idea since it might break something unexpected.
You may instead want to consider defining a macro that produces an upright subscript. I've defined such a macro (subtxt
) below.
Since it seems unlikely that you'll need underscores in math mode, I've also redefined _
to expand to subtxt
whenever it is used in math mode (and to produce an underscore otherwise, like normal).
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath} %% <- necessary for correct scaling of subscripts
begin{document}
newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
DeclareRobustCommand_{ifmmodeexpandaftersubtxtelsetextunderscorefi}
[
X_i + Xsubtxt{i} + X_i + X_{text goes here}
]
end{document}
Notes:
I'm using
textnormal
instead oftext
because the font of subscripts created with the latter command changes based on the surrounding text. You for instance probably wouldn't want all of your subscripts inside theorem environments to be in italics. See e.g. this answer for more info.I'm using
DeclareRobustCommand
to redefine_
because the original version of this macro is also defined like that. It isn't too important, but more information can be found here.
Unless you're using underscores for some other purpose in your document, you can now do a search-and-replace to change every _
into _
.
add a comment |
It is possible to overload _
to set all subscripts in roman type, but that seems like a bad idea since it might break something unexpected.
You may instead want to consider defining a macro that produces an upright subscript. I've defined such a macro (subtxt
) below.
Since it seems unlikely that you'll need underscores in math mode, I've also redefined _
to expand to subtxt
whenever it is used in math mode (and to produce an underscore otherwise, like normal).
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath} %% <- necessary for correct scaling of subscripts
begin{document}
newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
DeclareRobustCommand_{ifmmodeexpandaftersubtxtelsetextunderscorefi}
[
X_i + Xsubtxt{i} + X_i + X_{text goes here}
]
end{document}
Notes:
I'm using
textnormal
instead oftext
because the font of subscripts created with the latter command changes based on the surrounding text. You for instance probably wouldn't want all of your subscripts inside theorem environments to be in italics. See e.g. this answer for more info.I'm using
DeclareRobustCommand
to redefine_
because the original version of this macro is also defined like that. It isn't too important, but more information can be found here.
Unless you're using underscores for some other purpose in your document, you can now do a search-and-replace to change every _
into _
.
add a comment |
It is possible to overload _
to set all subscripts in roman type, but that seems like a bad idea since it might break something unexpected.
You may instead want to consider defining a macro that produces an upright subscript. I've defined such a macro (subtxt
) below.
Since it seems unlikely that you'll need underscores in math mode, I've also redefined _
to expand to subtxt
whenever it is used in math mode (and to produce an underscore otherwise, like normal).
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath} %% <- necessary for correct scaling of subscripts
begin{document}
newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
DeclareRobustCommand_{ifmmodeexpandaftersubtxtelsetextunderscorefi}
[
X_i + Xsubtxt{i} + X_i + X_{text goes here}
]
end{document}
Notes:
I'm using
textnormal
instead oftext
because the font of subscripts created with the latter command changes based on the surrounding text. You for instance probably wouldn't want all of your subscripts inside theorem environments to be in italics. See e.g. this answer for more info.I'm using
DeclareRobustCommand
to redefine_
because the original version of this macro is also defined like that. It isn't too important, but more information can be found here.
Unless you're using underscores for some other purpose in your document, you can now do a search-and-replace to change every _
into _
.
It is possible to overload _
to set all subscripts in roman type, but that seems like a bad idea since it might break something unexpected.
You may instead want to consider defining a macro that produces an upright subscript. I've defined such a macro (subtxt
) below.
Since it seems unlikely that you'll need underscores in math mode, I've also redefined _
to expand to subtxt
whenever it is used in math mode (and to produce an underscore otherwise, like normal).
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath} %% <- necessary for correct scaling of subscripts
begin{document}
newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
DeclareRobustCommand_{ifmmodeexpandaftersubtxtelsetextunderscorefi}
[
X_i + Xsubtxt{i} + X_i + X_{text goes here}
]
end{document}
Notes:
I'm using
textnormal
instead oftext
because the font of subscripts created with the latter command changes based on the surrounding text. You for instance probably wouldn't want all of your subscripts inside theorem environments to be in italics. See e.g. this answer for more info.I'm using
DeclareRobustCommand
to redefine_
because the original version of this macro is also defined like that. It isn't too important, but more information can be found here.
Unless you're using underscores for some other purpose in your document, you can now do a search-and-replace to change every _
into _
.
edited Dec 18 '18 at 22:41
answered Dec 18 '18 at 20:43
Circumscribe
4,6811432
4,6811432
add a comment |
add a comment |
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
sbox0{$$}
scriptfont1=scriptfont0
$X_{abc}+y_{max}$
end{document}
Note this affects all math uses of the script size font not just subscripts.
Would that work for equation, align and other environments?
– Andy Grey
Dec 18 '18 at 19:22
@AndyGrey yes..
– David Carlisle
Dec 18 '18 at 19:24
2
What kind of sorcery issbox0{$$}
for? Just loading the math fonts?
– Werner
Dec 18 '18 at 21:35
1
@Werner latex delays finalizing the math setup until the first use of math at each font size, so that you can switch math fonts. actually for basic math atnormalsize
it probably makes no difference as things are pre-loaded, but it's a good habit to make sure...
– David Carlisle
Dec 18 '18 at 21:48
1
$x_{max}$ worksfootnote{But $X_{max}$ doesn't} and what about $x_{max}$?
– egreg
Dec 18 '18 at 22:32
|
show 5 more comments
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
sbox0{$$}
scriptfont1=scriptfont0
$X_{abc}+y_{max}$
end{document}
Note this affects all math uses of the script size font not just subscripts.
Would that work for equation, align and other environments?
– Andy Grey
Dec 18 '18 at 19:22
@AndyGrey yes..
– David Carlisle
Dec 18 '18 at 19:24
2
What kind of sorcery issbox0{$$}
for? Just loading the math fonts?
– Werner
Dec 18 '18 at 21:35
1
@Werner latex delays finalizing the math setup until the first use of math at each font size, so that you can switch math fonts. actually for basic math atnormalsize
it probably makes no difference as things are pre-loaded, but it's a good habit to make sure...
– David Carlisle
Dec 18 '18 at 21:48
1
$x_{max}$ worksfootnote{But $X_{max}$ doesn't} and what about $x_{max}$?
– egreg
Dec 18 '18 at 22:32
|
show 5 more comments
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
sbox0{$$}
scriptfont1=scriptfont0
$X_{abc}+y_{max}$
end{document}
Note this affects all math uses of the script size font not just subscripts.
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
sbox0{$$}
scriptfont1=scriptfont0
$X_{abc}+y_{max}$
end{document}
Note this affects all math uses of the script size font not just subscripts.
answered Dec 18 '18 at 19:20
David Carlisle
482k3811141852
482k3811141852
Would that work for equation, align and other environments?
– Andy Grey
Dec 18 '18 at 19:22
@AndyGrey yes..
– David Carlisle
Dec 18 '18 at 19:24
2
What kind of sorcery issbox0{$$}
for? Just loading the math fonts?
– Werner
Dec 18 '18 at 21:35
1
@Werner latex delays finalizing the math setup until the first use of math at each font size, so that you can switch math fonts. actually for basic math atnormalsize
it probably makes no difference as things are pre-loaded, but it's a good habit to make sure...
– David Carlisle
Dec 18 '18 at 21:48
1
$x_{max}$ worksfootnote{But $X_{max}$ doesn't} and what about $x_{max}$?
– egreg
Dec 18 '18 at 22:32
|
show 5 more comments
Would that work for equation, align and other environments?
– Andy Grey
Dec 18 '18 at 19:22
@AndyGrey yes..
– David Carlisle
Dec 18 '18 at 19:24
2
What kind of sorcery issbox0{$$}
for? Just loading the math fonts?
– Werner
Dec 18 '18 at 21:35
1
@Werner latex delays finalizing the math setup until the first use of math at each font size, so that you can switch math fonts. actually for basic math atnormalsize
it probably makes no difference as things are pre-loaded, but it's a good habit to make sure...
– David Carlisle
Dec 18 '18 at 21:48
1
$x_{max}$ worksfootnote{But $X_{max}$ doesn't} and what about $x_{max}$?
– egreg
Dec 18 '18 at 22:32
Would that work for equation, align and other environments?
– Andy Grey
Dec 18 '18 at 19:22
Would that work for equation, align and other environments?
– Andy Grey
Dec 18 '18 at 19:22
@AndyGrey yes..
– David Carlisle
Dec 18 '18 at 19:24
@AndyGrey yes..
– David Carlisle
Dec 18 '18 at 19:24
2
2
What kind of sorcery is
sbox0{$$}
for? Just loading the math fonts?– Werner
Dec 18 '18 at 21:35
What kind of sorcery is
sbox0{$$}
for? Just loading the math fonts?– Werner
Dec 18 '18 at 21:35
1
1
@Werner latex delays finalizing the math setup until the first use of math at each font size, so that you can switch math fonts. actually for basic math at
normalsize
it probably makes no difference as things are pre-loaded, but it's a good habit to make sure...– David Carlisle
Dec 18 '18 at 21:48
@Werner latex delays finalizing the math setup until the first use of math at each font size, so that you can switch math fonts. actually for basic math at
normalsize
it probably makes no difference as things are pre-loaded, but it's a good habit to make sure...– David Carlisle
Dec 18 '18 at 21:48
1
1
$x_{max}$ worksfootnote{But $X_{max}$ doesn't} and what about $x_{max}$?
– egreg
Dec 18 '18 at 22:32
$x_{max}$ worksfootnote{But $X_{max}$ doesn't} and what about $x_{max}$?
– egreg
Dec 18 '18 at 22:32
|
show 5 more comments
Here's a LuaLaTeX-based solution. Subscripts enclosed by curly braces are typeset with upright ("roman") letters, as long as there's no space between the _
(underscore) character and the material enclosed in curly braces. If a subscript term is not enclosed in curly braces, e.g., $x_i$
, it's not processed by the Lua code.
If, for some reason, you do not want to the Lua function to operate on a subscript term encased in curly braces, just make sure that there are one or more spaces between _
and the subscript term. An obvious reason for wanting to suspend operation of the Lua function would be the fact that the subscript term contains math material which should be processed in math mode.
To activate operations, issue the instruction upsubOn
. To terminate them completely, execute upsubOff
.
% !TEX TS-program = lualatex
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,unicode-math}
usepackage{luacode}
%% Lua-side code:
begin{luacode}
function sub_up ( s )
return ( s:gsub ( "_(%b{})" , "_{\textnormal%1}" ) )
end
end{luacode}
%% LaTeX-side code:
newcommandupsubOn{directlua{luatexbase.add_to_callback(
"process_input_buffer" , sub_up , "subup" )}}
newcommandupsubOff{directlua{luatexbase.remove_from_callback(
"process_input_buffer" , "subup" )}}
AtBeginDocument{upsubOn} % activate the Lua function by default
begin{document}
$X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$
upsubOff
$X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$
end{document}
add a comment |
Here's a LuaLaTeX-based solution. Subscripts enclosed by curly braces are typeset with upright ("roman") letters, as long as there's no space between the _
(underscore) character and the material enclosed in curly braces. If a subscript term is not enclosed in curly braces, e.g., $x_i$
, it's not processed by the Lua code.
If, for some reason, you do not want to the Lua function to operate on a subscript term encased in curly braces, just make sure that there are one or more spaces between _
and the subscript term. An obvious reason for wanting to suspend operation of the Lua function would be the fact that the subscript term contains math material which should be processed in math mode.
To activate operations, issue the instruction upsubOn
. To terminate them completely, execute upsubOff
.
% !TEX TS-program = lualatex
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,unicode-math}
usepackage{luacode}
%% Lua-side code:
begin{luacode}
function sub_up ( s )
return ( s:gsub ( "_(%b{})" , "_{\textnormal%1}" ) )
end
end{luacode}
%% LaTeX-side code:
newcommandupsubOn{directlua{luatexbase.add_to_callback(
"process_input_buffer" , sub_up , "subup" )}}
newcommandupsubOff{directlua{luatexbase.remove_from_callback(
"process_input_buffer" , "subup" )}}
AtBeginDocument{upsubOn} % activate the Lua function by default
begin{document}
$X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$
upsubOff
$X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$
end{document}
add a comment |
Here's a LuaLaTeX-based solution. Subscripts enclosed by curly braces are typeset with upright ("roman") letters, as long as there's no space between the _
(underscore) character and the material enclosed in curly braces. If a subscript term is not enclosed in curly braces, e.g., $x_i$
, it's not processed by the Lua code.
If, for some reason, you do not want to the Lua function to operate on a subscript term encased in curly braces, just make sure that there are one or more spaces between _
and the subscript term. An obvious reason for wanting to suspend operation of the Lua function would be the fact that the subscript term contains math material which should be processed in math mode.
To activate operations, issue the instruction upsubOn
. To terminate them completely, execute upsubOff
.
% !TEX TS-program = lualatex
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,unicode-math}
usepackage{luacode}
%% Lua-side code:
begin{luacode}
function sub_up ( s )
return ( s:gsub ( "_(%b{})" , "_{\textnormal%1}" ) )
end
end{luacode}
%% LaTeX-side code:
newcommandupsubOn{directlua{luatexbase.add_to_callback(
"process_input_buffer" , sub_up , "subup" )}}
newcommandupsubOff{directlua{luatexbase.remove_from_callback(
"process_input_buffer" , "subup" )}}
AtBeginDocument{upsubOn} % activate the Lua function by default
begin{document}
$X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$
upsubOff
$X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$
end{document}
Here's a LuaLaTeX-based solution. Subscripts enclosed by curly braces are typeset with upright ("roman") letters, as long as there's no space between the _
(underscore) character and the material enclosed in curly braces. If a subscript term is not enclosed in curly braces, e.g., $x_i$
, it's not processed by the Lua code.
If, for some reason, you do not want to the Lua function to operate on a subscript term encased in curly braces, just make sure that there are one or more spaces between _
and the subscript term. An obvious reason for wanting to suspend operation of the Lua function would be the fact that the subscript term contains math material which should be processed in math mode.
To activate operations, issue the instruction upsubOn
. To terminate them completely, execute upsubOff
.
% !TEX TS-program = lualatex
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,unicode-math}
usepackage{luacode}
%% Lua-side code:
begin{luacode}
function sub_up ( s )
return ( s:gsub ( "_(%b{})" , "_{\textnormal%1}" ) )
end
end{luacode}
%% LaTeX-side code:
newcommandupsubOn{directlua{luatexbase.add_to_callback(
"process_input_buffer" , sub_up , "subup" )}}
newcommandupsubOff{directlua{luatexbase.remove_from_callback(
"process_input_buffer" , "subup" )}}
AtBeginDocument{upsubOn} % activate the Lua function by default
begin{document}
$X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$
upsubOff
$X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$
end{document}
answered Dec 18 '18 at 21:44
Mico
274k30370756
274k30370756
add a comment |
add a comment |
I suggest to use a different character for those subscripts. One way could be to use ?
that's very rarely used in math mode. Another uses ↓
(maybe you can find a way to type it easily).
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{newunicodechar} % for using ↓
% the main command
newcommand{uprightsubscript}[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
% this sets up the use of ?
begingrouplccode`~=`?lowercase{endgrouplet~}uprightsubscript
AtBeginDocument{mathcode`?="8000 }
% this sets up the use of ↓
newunicodechar{↓}{uprightsubscript}
textheight=2cm % just for making a smaller picture
begin{document}
$x?{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x?{max}$} and again $x?{max}$?
$x↓{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x↓{max}$} and again $x↓{max}$?
end{document}
add a comment |
I suggest to use a different character for those subscripts. One way could be to use ?
that's very rarely used in math mode. Another uses ↓
(maybe you can find a way to type it easily).
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{newunicodechar} % for using ↓
% the main command
newcommand{uprightsubscript}[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
% this sets up the use of ?
begingrouplccode`~=`?lowercase{endgrouplet~}uprightsubscript
AtBeginDocument{mathcode`?="8000 }
% this sets up the use of ↓
newunicodechar{↓}{uprightsubscript}
textheight=2cm % just for making a smaller picture
begin{document}
$x?{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x?{max}$} and again $x?{max}$?
$x↓{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x↓{max}$} and again $x↓{max}$?
end{document}
add a comment |
I suggest to use a different character for those subscripts. One way could be to use ?
that's very rarely used in math mode. Another uses ↓
(maybe you can find a way to type it easily).
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{newunicodechar} % for using ↓
% the main command
newcommand{uprightsubscript}[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
% this sets up the use of ?
begingrouplccode`~=`?lowercase{endgrouplet~}uprightsubscript
AtBeginDocument{mathcode`?="8000 }
% this sets up the use of ↓
newunicodechar{↓}{uprightsubscript}
textheight=2cm % just for making a smaller picture
begin{document}
$x?{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x?{max}$} and again $x?{max}$?
$x↓{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x↓{max}$} and again $x↓{max}$?
end{document}
I suggest to use a different character for those subscripts. One way could be to use ?
that's very rarely used in math mode. Another uses ↓
(maybe you can find a way to type it easily).
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{newunicodechar} % for using ↓
% the main command
newcommand{uprightsubscript}[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
% this sets up the use of ?
begingrouplccode`~=`?lowercase{endgrouplet~}uprightsubscript
AtBeginDocument{mathcode`?="8000 }
% this sets up the use of ↓
newunicodechar{↓}{uprightsubscript}
textheight=2cm % just for making a smaller picture
begin{document}
$x?{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x?{max}$} and again $x?{max}$?
$x↓{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x↓{max}$} and again $x↓{max}$?
end{document}
answered Dec 18 '18 at 22:53
egreg
709k8618823165
709k8618823165
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466411%2fnon-italic-roman-subscripts-in-math-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The following is not an answer but a remark. With
text
the font will change with the surrounding text, so it'll e.g. be italic inside a theorem environment. This is probably undesirable, so I would recommend usingtextnormal
instead.– Circumscribe
Dec 18 '18 at 18:31
It is possible to overload
_
to do this, but it might break things. Might definingnewcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
and doing a search-and-replace for_
→subtxt
be a good alternative?– Circumscribe
Dec 18 '18 at 18:38
see e.g. tex.stackexchange.com/a/228606/2388
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 18 '18 at 18:38
@Circumscribe thanks! I'll give that a try!
– Andy Grey
Dec 18 '18 at 18:40
1
Please also confirm that really all letters in subscript positions should be rendered in upright ("roman") letters. E.g., should the letters
i
andj
inx_i
andy_j
be typeset using upright letters? Or should only groups of 2 or more, or 3 or more, letters in subscript positions be typeset using roman characters?– Mico
Dec 18 '18 at 19:43