Finding elements of $mathbb{Z}_3[x] /langle x^2+2rangle$ and writing the multiplication table











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I want to list elements of $mathbb{Z}_3[x] /langle x^2+2rangle$ and write a multiplication table. Here is my attempt to finding the elements:



Let $A =langle x^2+2rangle= {(x^2+2)f(x): f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ and $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A = {f(x) + A: f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ by definition.



Let $f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$. By division algorithm, $f(x) = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx$ for some $q(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$ and $a,b in mathbb{Z}_3$. Hence, $f(x) + A = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx + A = a + bx + (x^2+2)q(x) + A$. Since $(x^2+2)q(x) in A$, $(x^2+2)q(x) + A = A$. Thus, $f(x) + A = a + bx + A$. So we have $mathbb{Z_3}[x] / A = {a + bx + A: a,b in mathbb{Z_3}}$. Hence, the elements are the following:




  1. $A$

  2. $1 + A$

  3. $x + A$

  4. $2 + A$

  5. $2x + A$

  6. $1 + x + A$

  7. $2 + x + A$

  8. $2 + 2x + A$

  9. $1 + 2x + A$


My question is:



1) Is this the right derivation?



2) How does multiplication table work in $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A$? For example, if I have $(x+A)(1+2x+A) = x(1+2x) + A = x+2x^2 + A$ which is not in the same form as $ax+b+A$.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I want to list elements of $mathbb{Z}_3[x] /langle x^2+2rangle$ and write a multiplication table. Here is my attempt to finding the elements:



    Let $A =langle x^2+2rangle= {(x^2+2)f(x): f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ and $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A = {f(x) + A: f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ by definition.



    Let $f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$. By division algorithm, $f(x) = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx$ for some $q(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$ and $a,b in mathbb{Z}_3$. Hence, $f(x) + A = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx + A = a + bx + (x^2+2)q(x) + A$. Since $(x^2+2)q(x) in A$, $(x^2+2)q(x) + A = A$. Thus, $f(x) + A = a + bx + A$. So we have $mathbb{Z_3}[x] / A = {a + bx + A: a,b in mathbb{Z_3}}$. Hence, the elements are the following:




    1. $A$

    2. $1 + A$

    3. $x + A$

    4. $2 + A$

    5. $2x + A$

    6. $1 + x + A$

    7. $2 + x + A$

    8. $2 + 2x + A$

    9. $1 + 2x + A$


    My question is:



    1) Is this the right derivation?



    2) How does multiplication table work in $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A$? For example, if I have $(x+A)(1+2x+A) = x(1+2x) + A = x+2x^2 + A$ which is not in the same form as $ax+b+A$.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I want to list elements of $mathbb{Z}_3[x] /langle x^2+2rangle$ and write a multiplication table. Here is my attempt to finding the elements:



      Let $A =langle x^2+2rangle= {(x^2+2)f(x): f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ and $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A = {f(x) + A: f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ by definition.



      Let $f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$. By division algorithm, $f(x) = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx$ for some $q(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$ and $a,b in mathbb{Z}_3$. Hence, $f(x) + A = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx + A = a + bx + (x^2+2)q(x) + A$. Since $(x^2+2)q(x) in A$, $(x^2+2)q(x) + A = A$. Thus, $f(x) + A = a + bx + A$. So we have $mathbb{Z_3}[x] / A = {a + bx + A: a,b in mathbb{Z_3}}$. Hence, the elements are the following:




      1. $A$

      2. $1 + A$

      3. $x + A$

      4. $2 + A$

      5. $2x + A$

      6. $1 + x + A$

      7. $2 + x + A$

      8. $2 + 2x + A$

      9. $1 + 2x + A$


      My question is:



      1) Is this the right derivation?



      2) How does multiplication table work in $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A$? For example, if I have $(x+A)(1+2x+A) = x(1+2x) + A = x+2x^2 + A$ which is not in the same form as $ax+b+A$.










      share|cite|improve this question















      I want to list elements of $mathbb{Z}_3[x] /langle x^2+2rangle$ and write a multiplication table. Here is my attempt to finding the elements:



      Let $A =langle x^2+2rangle= {(x^2+2)f(x): f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ and $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A = {f(x) + A: f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ by definition.



      Let $f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$. By division algorithm, $f(x) = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx$ for some $q(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$ and $a,b in mathbb{Z}_3$. Hence, $f(x) + A = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx + A = a + bx + (x^2+2)q(x) + A$. Since $(x^2+2)q(x) in A$, $(x^2+2)q(x) + A = A$. Thus, $f(x) + A = a + bx + A$. So we have $mathbb{Z_3}[x] / A = {a + bx + A: a,b in mathbb{Z_3}}$. Hence, the elements are the following:




      1. $A$

      2. $1 + A$

      3. $x + A$

      4. $2 + A$

      5. $2x + A$

      6. $1 + x + A$

      7. $2 + x + A$

      8. $2 + 2x + A$

      9. $1 + 2x + A$


      My question is:



      1) Is this the right derivation?



      2) How does multiplication table work in $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A$? For example, if I have $(x+A)(1+2x+A) = x(1+2x) + A = x+2x^2 + A$ which is not in the same form as $ax+b+A$.







      abstract-algebra polynomials ring-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 20 at 16:23









      José Carlos Santos

      144k20114214




      144k20114214










      asked Nov 20 at 16:11









      Ted

      738




      738






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote














          1. Yes, that is the right derivation.

          2. Now, divide $2x^2+x$ by $x^2+2$. That is easy:$$2x^2+x=2times(x^2+2).$$So, the remainder is $0$, wich means that, in your ring, $(x+A)(1+2x+A)=0+A=0$. In particular, your ring is not a field (not a surprise, since $x^2+2=(x+1)(x+2)$ in $mathbb{Z}_3[x]$).






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Using mod notation, in the quotient ring we have $,color{#c00}{x^2}equiv -2equivcolor{#c00}1,$ which implies every polynomial is congruent to one of degree $le 1,,$ because $,x^{large 2q+r}! = (color{#c00}{x^{large 2}})^{large q},x^{large r} equiv color{#c00}{1}^{large q},x^{large r}equiv x^{large r}, $ for $,rin {0,1}$



            Alternatively breaking into even+odd parts $,f(x) = g(color{#c00}{x^2}) + x, h(color{#c00}{x^2})$ $Rightarrow, f(x)equiv g(color{#c00}{1}) + x, h(color{#c00}{1})$



            Or we can apply Division with Remainder: $,f(x) = q(x) (color{#c00}{x^2}!-!color{#c00}1) + ax+b,Rightarrow, f(x)equiv ax+b$



            So every $f(x)$ is congruent to $,(f,bmod x^2!-!1)bmod 3,$ having degree $le 1$, and these linear reps $,f,g,$ are incongruent else $,x^2-1,$ divides a lower degree polynomial $,f - g notequiv 0pmod{!3}.,$ Therefore they comprise a complete set of representatives of the quotient ring classes (cosets). In particular, there are $,3^2 = 9$ such linear reps $,ax+b$ corresponding to the $3$ choices for the coef's $,a,bbmod 3$. Your table correctly lists these $9$ reps.



            To multiply these linear normal-form reps compute the polynomial product then replace $,color{#c00}{x^2},$ by $,color{#c00}{1},$



            $$ (a_1x + a_0)(b_1 x + b_0), equiv, (a_0 b_1 + a_1 b_0), x + a_0 b_0 color{#c00}{+1},a_1 b_1$$



            while performing coefficient arithmetic $!bmod 3.,$ The coefficient arithmetic will be slightly simpler if we use $,-1,$ vs. $,2,$ as our rep for $,2+3Bbb Z,,$ which also serves to clarify innate algebraic structure, e.g. $,(x+1)(x-1) = color{#c00}{x^2}-color{#c00}1equiv 0,$ vs. $,(x+1)(x+2)equiv color{#c00}{x^2}+3x+color{#c00}2equiv 0$






            share|cite|improve this answer























              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006512%2ffinding-elements-of-mathbbz-3x-langle-x22-rangle-and-writing-the-mult%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              1
              down vote














              1. Yes, that is the right derivation.

              2. Now, divide $2x^2+x$ by $x^2+2$. That is easy:$$2x^2+x=2times(x^2+2).$$So, the remainder is $0$, wich means that, in your ring, $(x+A)(1+2x+A)=0+A=0$. In particular, your ring is not a field (not a surprise, since $x^2+2=(x+1)(x+2)$ in $mathbb{Z}_3[x]$).






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote














                1. Yes, that is the right derivation.

                2. Now, divide $2x^2+x$ by $x^2+2$. That is easy:$$2x^2+x=2times(x^2+2).$$So, the remainder is $0$, wich means that, in your ring, $(x+A)(1+2x+A)=0+A=0$. In particular, your ring is not a field (not a surprise, since $x^2+2=(x+1)(x+2)$ in $mathbb{Z}_3[x]$).






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  1. Yes, that is the right derivation.

                  2. Now, divide $2x^2+x$ by $x^2+2$. That is easy:$$2x^2+x=2times(x^2+2).$$So, the remainder is $0$, wich means that, in your ring, $(x+A)(1+2x+A)=0+A=0$. In particular, your ring is not a field (not a surprise, since $x^2+2=(x+1)(x+2)$ in $mathbb{Z}_3[x]$).






                  share|cite|improve this answer













                  1. Yes, that is the right derivation.

                  2. Now, divide $2x^2+x$ by $x^2+2$. That is easy:$$2x^2+x=2times(x^2+2).$$So, the remainder is $0$, wich means that, in your ring, $(x+A)(1+2x+A)=0+A=0$. In particular, your ring is not a field (not a surprise, since $x^2+2=(x+1)(x+2)$ in $mathbb{Z}_3[x]$).







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 20 at 16:22









                  José Carlos Santos

                  144k20114214




                  144k20114214






















                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      Using mod notation, in the quotient ring we have $,color{#c00}{x^2}equiv -2equivcolor{#c00}1,$ which implies every polynomial is congruent to one of degree $le 1,,$ because $,x^{large 2q+r}! = (color{#c00}{x^{large 2}})^{large q},x^{large r} equiv color{#c00}{1}^{large q},x^{large r}equiv x^{large r}, $ for $,rin {0,1}$



                      Alternatively breaking into even+odd parts $,f(x) = g(color{#c00}{x^2}) + x, h(color{#c00}{x^2})$ $Rightarrow, f(x)equiv g(color{#c00}{1}) + x, h(color{#c00}{1})$



                      Or we can apply Division with Remainder: $,f(x) = q(x) (color{#c00}{x^2}!-!color{#c00}1) + ax+b,Rightarrow, f(x)equiv ax+b$



                      So every $f(x)$ is congruent to $,(f,bmod x^2!-!1)bmod 3,$ having degree $le 1$, and these linear reps $,f,g,$ are incongruent else $,x^2-1,$ divides a lower degree polynomial $,f - g notequiv 0pmod{!3}.,$ Therefore they comprise a complete set of representatives of the quotient ring classes (cosets). In particular, there are $,3^2 = 9$ such linear reps $,ax+b$ corresponding to the $3$ choices for the coef's $,a,bbmod 3$. Your table correctly lists these $9$ reps.



                      To multiply these linear normal-form reps compute the polynomial product then replace $,color{#c00}{x^2},$ by $,color{#c00}{1},$



                      $$ (a_1x + a_0)(b_1 x + b_0), equiv, (a_0 b_1 + a_1 b_0), x + a_0 b_0 color{#c00}{+1},a_1 b_1$$



                      while performing coefficient arithmetic $!bmod 3.,$ The coefficient arithmetic will be slightly simpler if we use $,-1,$ vs. $,2,$ as our rep for $,2+3Bbb Z,,$ which also serves to clarify innate algebraic structure, e.g. $,(x+1)(x-1) = color{#c00}{x^2}-color{#c00}1equiv 0,$ vs. $,(x+1)(x+2)equiv color{#c00}{x^2}+3x+color{#c00}2equiv 0$






                      share|cite|improve this answer



























                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        Using mod notation, in the quotient ring we have $,color{#c00}{x^2}equiv -2equivcolor{#c00}1,$ which implies every polynomial is congruent to one of degree $le 1,,$ because $,x^{large 2q+r}! = (color{#c00}{x^{large 2}})^{large q},x^{large r} equiv color{#c00}{1}^{large q},x^{large r}equiv x^{large r}, $ for $,rin {0,1}$



                        Alternatively breaking into even+odd parts $,f(x) = g(color{#c00}{x^2}) + x, h(color{#c00}{x^2})$ $Rightarrow, f(x)equiv g(color{#c00}{1}) + x, h(color{#c00}{1})$



                        Or we can apply Division with Remainder: $,f(x) = q(x) (color{#c00}{x^2}!-!color{#c00}1) + ax+b,Rightarrow, f(x)equiv ax+b$



                        So every $f(x)$ is congruent to $,(f,bmod x^2!-!1)bmod 3,$ having degree $le 1$, and these linear reps $,f,g,$ are incongruent else $,x^2-1,$ divides a lower degree polynomial $,f - g notequiv 0pmod{!3}.,$ Therefore they comprise a complete set of representatives of the quotient ring classes (cosets). In particular, there are $,3^2 = 9$ such linear reps $,ax+b$ corresponding to the $3$ choices for the coef's $,a,bbmod 3$. Your table correctly lists these $9$ reps.



                        To multiply these linear normal-form reps compute the polynomial product then replace $,color{#c00}{x^2},$ by $,color{#c00}{1},$



                        $$ (a_1x + a_0)(b_1 x + b_0), equiv, (a_0 b_1 + a_1 b_0), x + a_0 b_0 color{#c00}{+1},a_1 b_1$$



                        while performing coefficient arithmetic $!bmod 3.,$ The coefficient arithmetic will be slightly simpler if we use $,-1,$ vs. $,2,$ as our rep for $,2+3Bbb Z,,$ which also serves to clarify innate algebraic structure, e.g. $,(x+1)(x-1) = color{#c00}{x^2}-color{#c00}1equiv 0,$ vs. $,(x+1)(x+2)equiv color{#c00}{x^2}+3x+color{#c00}2equiv 0$






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote









                          Using mod notation, in the quotient ring we have $,color{#c00}{x^2}equiv -2equivcolor{#c00}1,$ which implies every polynomial is congruent to one of degree $le 1,,$ because $,x^{large 2q+r}! = (color{#c00}{x^{large 2}})^{large q},x^{large r} equiv color{#c00}{1}^{large q},x^{large r}equiv x^{large r}, $ for $,rin {0,1}$



                          Alternatively breaking into even+odd parts $,f(x) = g(color{#c00}{x^2}) + x, h(color{#c00}{x^2})$ $Rightarrow, f(x)equiv g(color{#c00}{1}) + x, h(color{#c00}{1})$



                          Or we can apply Division with Remainder: $,f(x) = q(x) (color{#c00}{x^2}!-!color{#c00}1) + ax+b,Rightarrow, f(x)equiv ax+b$



                          So every $f(x)$ is congruent to $,(f,bmod x^2!-!1)bmod 3,$ having degree $le 1$, and these linear reps $,f,g,$ are incongruent else $,x^2-1,$ divides a lower degree polynomial $,f - g notequiv 0pmod{!3}.,$ Therefore they comprise a complete set of representatives of the quotient ring classes (cosets). In particular, there are $,3^2 = 9$ such linear reps $,ax+b$ corresponding to the $3$ choices for the coef's $,a,bbmod 3$. Your table correctly lists these $9$ reps.



                          To multiply these linear normal-form reps compute the polynomial product then replace $,color{#c00}{x^2},$ by $,color{#c00}{1},$



                          $$ (a_1x + a_0)(b_1 x + b_0), equiv, (a_0 b_1 + a_1 b_0), x + a_0 b_0 color{#c00}{+1},a_1 b_1$$



                          while performing coefficient arithmetic $!bmod 3.,$ The coefficient arithmetic will be slightly simpler if we use $,-1,$ vs. $,2,$ as our rep for $,2+3Bbb Z,,$ which also serves to clarify innate algebraic structure, e.g. $,(x+1)(x-1) = color{#c00}{x^2}-color{#c00}1equiv 0,$ vs. $,(x+1)(x+2)equiv color{#c00}{x^2}+3x+color{#c00}2equiv 0$






                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          Using mod notation, in the quotient ring we have $,color{#c00}{x^2}equiv -2equivcolor{#c00}1,$ which implies every polynomial is congruent to one of degree $le 1,,$ because $,x^{large 2q+r}! = (color{#c00}{x^{large 2}})^{large q},x^{large r} equiv color{#c00}{1}^{large q},x^{large r}equiv x^{large r}, $ for $,rin {0,1}$



                          Alternatively breaking into even+odd parts $,f(x) = g(color{#c00}{x^2}) + x, h(color{#c00}{x^2})$ $Rightarrow, f(x)equiv g(color{#c00}{1}) + x, h(color{#c00}{1})$



                          Or we can apply Division with Remainder: $,f(x) = q(x) (color{#c00}{x^2}!-!color{#c00}1) + ax+b,Rightarrow, f(x)equiv ax+b$



                          So every $f(x)$ is congruent to $,(f,bmod x^2!-!1)bmod 3,$ having degree $le 1$, and these linear reps $,f,g,$ are incongruent else $,x^2-1,$ divides a lower degree polynomial $,f - g notequiv 0pmod{!3}.,$ Therefore they comprise a complete set of representatives of the quotient ring classes (cosets). In particular, there are $,3^2 = 9$ such linear reps $,ax+b$ corresponding to the $3$ choices for the coef's $,a,bbmod 3$. Your table correctly lists these $9$ reps.



                          To multiply these linear normal-form reps compute the polynomial product then replace $,color{#c00}{x^2},$ by $,color{#c00}{1},$



                          $$ (a_1x + a_0)(b_1 x + b_0), equiv, (a_0 b_1 + a_1 b_0), x + a_0 b_0 color{#c00}{+1},a_1 b_1$$



                          while performing coefficient arithmetic $!bmod 3.,$ The coefficient arithmetic will be slightly simpler if we use $,-1,$ vs. $,2,$ as our rep for $,2+3Bbb Z,,$ which also serves to clarify innate algebraic structure, e.g. $,(x+1)(x-1) = color{#c00}{x^2}-color{#c00}1equiv 0,$ vs. $,(x+1)(x+2)equiv color{#c00}{x^2}+3x+color{#c00}2equiv 0$







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Nov 20 at 18:10

























                          answered Nov 20 at 17:40









                          Bill Dubuque

                          207k29189624




                          207k29189624






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006512%2ffinding-elements-of-mathbbz-3x-langle-x22-rangle-and-writing-the-mult%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

                              When does type information flow backwards in C++?

                              Grease: Live!