Counterexamples: Integral over the interior of a bounded set
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This is basically this question:
Function integrable over the interior but not over the set
I was wondering: is there an easier counterexample that does not involve an obese Cantor set?
integration measure-theory lebesgue-integral
asked Nov 20 at 15:27
B. Pasternak
1,131720
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This is basically this question:
Function integrable over the interior but not over the set
I was wondering: is there an easier counterexample that does not involve an obese Cantor set?
integration measure-theory lebesgue-integral
asked Nov 20 at 15:27
B. Pasternak
1,131720
You need a set with relatively large boundary (i.e. positive measure). So a fat Cantor set is about as simple as it can get, I think.
– Arthur
Nov 20 at 15:30
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This is basically this question:
Function integrable over the interior but not over the set
I was wondering: is there an easier counterexample that does not involve an obese Cantor set?
integration measure-theory lebesgue-integral
asked Nov 20 at 15:27
B. Pasternak
1,131720
This is basically this question:
Function integrable over the interior but not over the set
I was wondering: is there an easier counterexample that does not involve an obese Cantor set?
integration measure-theory lebesgue-integral
integration measure-theory lebesgue-integral
asked Nov 20 at 15:27
B. Pasternak
1,131720
asked Nov 20 at 15:27
B. Pasternak
1,131720
asked Nov 20 at 15:27
B. Pasternak
1,131720
asked Nov 20 at 15:27
B. Pasternak
1,131720
asked Nov 20 at 15:27
B. Pasternak
1,131720
1,131720
You need a set with relatively large boundary (i.e. positive measure). So a fat Cantor set is about as simple as it can get, I think.
– Arthur
Nov 20 at 15:30
add a comment |
You need a set with relatively large boundary (i.e. positive measure). So a fat Cantor set is about as simple as it can get, I think.
– Arthur
Nov 20 at 15:30
You need a set with relatively large boundary (i.e. positive measure). So a fat Cantor set is about as simple as it can get, I think.
– Arthur
Nov 20 at 15:30
You need a set with relatively large boundary (i.e. positive measure). So a fat Cantor set is about as simple as it can get, I think.
– Arthur
Nov 20 at 15:30
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006457%2fcounterexamples-integral-over-the-interior-of-a-bounded-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You need a set with relatively large boundary (i.e. positive measure). So a fat Cantor set is about as simple as it can get, I think.
– Arthur
Nov 20 at 15:30