Prove J is an ideal.











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












enter image description here



I understand that first i must check J is a subring then prove right & left ideals. My question is the notation on the elements in I. How would i subtract/multiply 2 functions of I.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    ... or note that $J$ is the kernel of the canonical ring homomorphism $Bbb Z[x]to Bbb F_2[x]$. -- But what is the $I$ that later occurs?
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Nov 18 at 23:34










  • sorry my question only concerns part (a).
    – H.B
    Nov 18 at 23:36










  • to check J is an ideal, i must check it is non empty, closed under subtraction and multiplication. Finally i must check that J absorbs products. My confusion is how to deal with the functions in J. For example how would i show f(x)-g(x) is closed for f(x),g(x) in J.
    – H.B
    Nov 18 at 23:39










  • $I$ is not defined in this post.
    – Matt Samuel
    Nov 18 at 23:39










  • I meant to write J not I, sorry.
    – H.B
    Nov 18 at 23:41















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












enter image description here



I understand that first i must check J is a subring then prove right & left ideals. My question is the notation on the elements in I. How would i subtract/multiply 2 functions of I.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    ... or note that $J$ is the kernel of the canonical ring homomorphism $Bbb Z[x]to Bbb F_2[x]$. -- But what is the $I$ that later occurs?
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Nov 18 at 23:34










  • sorry my question only concerns part (a).
    – H.B
    Nov 18 at 23:36










  • to check J is an ideal, i must check it is non empty, closed under subtraction and multiplication. Finally i must check that J absorbs products. My confusion is how to deal with the functions in J. For example how would i show f(x)-g(x) is closed for f(x),g(x) in J.
    – H.B
    Nov 18 at 23:39










  • $I$ is not defined in this post.
    – Matt Samuel
    Nov 18 at 23:39










  • I meant to write J not I, sorry.
    – H.B
    Nov 18 at 23:41













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











enter image description here



I understand that first i must check J is a subring then prove right & left ideals. My question is the notation on the elements in I. How would i subtract/multiply 2 functions of I.










share|cite|improve this question















enter image description here



I understand that first i must check J is a subring then prove right & left ideals. My question is the notation on the elements in I. How would i subtract/multiply 2 functions of I.







abstract-algebra ideals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 19 at 0:02









The R

516




516










asked Nov 18 at 23:30









H.B

203




203








  • 1




    ... or note that $J$ is the kernel of the canonical ring homomorphism $Bbb Z[x]to Bbb F_2[x]$. -- But what is the $I$ that later occurs?
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Nov 18 at 23:34










  • sorry my question only concerns part (a).
    – H.B
    Nov 18 at 23:36










  • to check J is an ideal, i must check it is non empty, closed under subtraction and multiplication. Finally i must check that J absorbs products. My confusion is how to deal with the functions in J. For example how would i show f(x)-g(x) is closed for f(x),g(x) in J.
    – H.B
    Nov 18 at 23:39










  • $I$ is not defined in this post.
    – Matt Samuel
    Nov 18 at 23:39










  • I meant to write J not I, sorry.
    – H.B
    Nov 18 at 23:41














  • 1




    ... or note that $J$ is the kernel of the canonical ring homomorphism $Bbb Z[x]to Bbb F_2[x]$. -- But what is the $I$ that later occurs?
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Nov 18 at 23:34










  • sorry my question only concerns part (a).
    – H.B
    Nov 18 at 23:36










  • to check J is an ideal, i must check it is non empty, closed under subtraction and multiplication. Finally i must check that J absorbs products. My confusion is how to deal with the functions in J. For example how would i show f(x)-g(x) is closed for f(x),g(x) in J.
    – H.B
    Nov 18 at 23:39










  • $I$ is not defined in this post.
    – Matt Samuel
    Nov 18 at 23:39










  • I meant to write J not I, sorry.
    – H.B
    Nov 18 at 23:41








1




1




... or note that $J$ is the kernel of the canonical ring homomorphism $Bbb Z[x]to Bbb F_2[x]$. -- But what is the $I$ that later occurs?
– Hagen von Eitzen
Nov 18 at 23:34




... or note that $J$ is the kernel of the canonical ring homomorphism $Bbb Z[x]to Bbb F_2[x]$. -- But what is the $I$ that later occurs?
– Hagen von Eitzen
Nov 18 at 23:34












sorry my question only concerns part (a).
– H.B
Nov 18 at 23:36




sorry my question only concerns part (a).
– H.B
Nov 18 at 23:36












to check J is an ideal, i must check it is non empty, closed under subtraction and multiplication. Finally i must check that J absorbs products. My confusion is how to deal with the functions in J. For example how would i show f(x)-g(x) is closed for f(x),g(x) in J.
– H.B
Nov 18 at 23:39




to check J is an ideal, i must check it is non empty, closed under subtraction and multiplication. Finally i must check that J absorbs products. My confusion is how to deal with the functions in J. For example how would i show f(x)-g(x) is closed for f(x),g(x) in J.
– H.B
Nov 18 at 23:39












$I$ is not defined in this post.
– Matt Samuel
Nov 18 at 23:39




$I$ is not defined in this post.
– Matt Samuel
Nov 18 at 23:39












I meant to write J not I, sorry.
– H.B
Nov 18 at 23:41




I meant to write J not I, sorry.
– H.B
Nov 18 at 23:41










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Consider general arbitrary elements $P,Q in J$, and an element $R in mathbb{Z}[x]$.



Then clearly $P(x)R(x)$ has even coefficients because the product of any integer with an even integer is even, thus $R(x) in J$.



Furthermore, $P(x) + Q(x)$ must also have even coefficients because the sum of any two even numbers is again even.



This is sufficient, and proves that $J$ is an ideal.



(If you're unsure why this is sufficient, consider why these conditions imply that $(J,+)$ is a subgroup of $(mathbb{Z}[x]$,+) and $jr in J$ for all $j in J, r in R$ - these are precisely the requirements of a (two-sided) ideal).



Edit: In terms of notation, because we're talking about polynomials here you consider multiplication of functions to be exactly the multiplication you'd expect, e.g. $(x^2 + 2)(x + 1) = x^3 + x^2 + 2x + 2 in mathbb{Z}[x]$. The same for addition.






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Perhaps it would help to see this problem solved more explicitly. We first note that $0 = 2cdot 0 in J$, so $J neq emptyset$. I will consider the case of $f(X) - g(X)$. Consider $f(X),g(X) in J$. Then we have $f(X) = a_nX^n + a_{n-1}X^{n-1} + dotsb + a_0$ and $g(X) = b_mX^m + b_{m-1}X^{m-1} + dotsb + b_0$ with $a_n,a_{n-1},dotsc,a_0 in 2Bbb Z$ and $ b_m,b_{m-1},dotsc,b_0 in 2Bbb{Z}$. That is, $a_i = 2a'_i$ and $b_j = 2b'_j$ for $i = 1,dotsc,n$ and for $j = 1,dotsc,m$. For convenience, suppose $m leq n$ and let $b_j = 0$ for $m < j leq n$ if $m < n$. Thus we may assume $m = n$. We have
    $$begin{align}f(X) - g(X) &= left(a_nX^n + a_{n-1}X^{n-1} + dotsb + a_0right) - left(b_nX^n + b_{n-1}X^{n-1} + dotsb + b_0right)\
    &= (a_n - b_n)X^n + (a_{n-1} - b_{n-1})X^{n-1} + dotsb + (a_0 - b_0)\
    &= 2(a'_n - b'_n)X^n + 2(a'_{n-1} - b'_{n-1})X^{n-1} + dotsb + 2(a'_0 + b'_0) in J.end{align}$$

    Thus $f(X) - g(X) in J$ for $f(X),g(X) in J$ and so $J$ has the structure of an abelian group. That $J$ is closed under multiplication follows similarly, and could prove fruitful to write down explicitly such a problem at least once.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Yes this helps a lot !! I just needed to see how I would write this in a formal proof.
      – H.B
      Nov 19 at 0:55










    • I highly recommend the multiplicative case as an exercise then. I recall elementary symmetric polynomials here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_symmetric_polynomial
      – Thomas Chansler
      Nov 19 at 10:38











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004284%2fprove-j-is-an-ideal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Consider general arbitrary elements $P,Q in J$, and an element $R in mathbb{Z}[x]$.



    Then clearly $P(x)R(x)$ has even coefficients because the product of any integer with an even integer is even, thus $R(x) in J$.



    Furthermore, $P(x) + Q(x)$ must also have even coefficients because the sum of any two even numbers is again even.



    This is sufficient, and proves that $J$ is an ideal.



    (If you're unsure why this is sufficient, consider why these conditions imply that $(J,+)$ is a subgroup of $(mathbb{Z}[x]$,+) and $jr in J$ for all $j in J, r in R$ - these are precisely the requirements of a (two-sided) ideal).



    Edit: In terms of notation, because we're talking about polynomials here you consider multiplication of functions to be exactly the multiplication you'd expect, e.g. $(x^2 + 2)(x + 1) = x^3 + x^2 + 2x + 2 in mathbb{Z}[x]$. The same for addition.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Consider general arbitrary elements $P,Q in J$, and an element $R in mathbb{Z}[x]$.



      Then clearly $P(x)R(x)$ has even coefficients because the product of any integer with an even integer is even, thus $R(x) in J$.



      Furthermore, $P(x) + Q(x)$ must also have even coefficients because the sum of any two even numbers is again even.



      This is sufficient, and proves that $J$ is an ideal.



      (If you're unsure why this is sufficient, consider why these conditions imply that $(J,+)$ is a subgroup of $(mathbb{Z}[x]$,+) and $jr in J$ for all $j in J, r in R$ - these are precisely the requirements of a (two-sided) ideal).



      Edit: In terms of notation, because we're talking about polynomials here you consider multiplication of functions to be exactly the multiplication you'd expect, e.g. $(x^2 + 2)(x + 1) = x^3 + x^2 + 2x + 2 in mathbb{Z}[x]$. The same for addition.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Consider general arbitrary elements $P,Q in J$, and an element $R in mathbb{Z}[x]$.



        Then clearly $P(x)R(x)$ has even coefficients because the product of any integer with an even integer is even, thus $R(x) in J$.



        Furthermore, $P(x) + Q(x)$ must also have even coefficients because the sum of any two even numbers is again even.



        This is sufficient, and proves that $J$ is an ideal.



        (If you're unsure why this is sufficient, consider why these conditions imply that $(J,+)$ is a subgroup of $(mathbb{Z}[x]$,+) and $jr in J$ for all $j in J, r in R$ - these are precisely the requirements of a (two-sided) ideal).



        Edit: In terms of notation, because we're talking about polynomials here you consider multiplication of functions to be exactly the multiplication you'd expect, e.g. $(x^2 + 2)(x + 1) = x^3 + x^2 + 2x + 2 in mathbb{Z}[x]$. The same for addition.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Consider general arbitrary elements $P,Q in J$, and an element $R in mathbb{Z}[x]$.



        Then clearly $P(x)R(x)$ has even coefficients because the product of any integer with an even integer is even, thus $R(x) in J$.



        Furthermore, $P(x) + Q(x)$ must also have even coefficients because the sum of any two even numbers is again even.



        This is sufficient, and proves that $J$ is an ideal.



        (If you're unsure why this is sufficient, consider why these conditions imply that $(J,+)$ is a subgroup of $(mathbb{Z}[x]$,+) and $jr in J$ for all $j in J, r in R$ - these are precisely the requirements of a (two-sided) ideal).



        Edit: In terms of notation, because we're talking about polynomials here you consider multiplication of functions to be exactly the multiplication you'd expect, e.g. $(x^2 + 2)(x + 1) = x^3 + x^2 + 2x + 2 in mathbb{Z}[x]$. The same for addition.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 19 at 0:01

























        answered Nov 18 at 23:52









        Stuartg98

        385




        385






















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Perhaps it would help to see this problem solved more explicitly. We first note that $0 = 2cdot 0 in J$, so $J neq emptyset$. I will consider the case of $f(X) - g(X)$. Consider $f(X),g(X) in J$. Then we have $f(X) = a_nX^n + a_{n-1}X^{n-1} + dotsb + a_0$ and $g(X) = b_mX^m + b_{m-1}X^{m-1} + dotsb + b_0$ with $a_n,a_{n-1},dotsc,a_0 in 2Bbb Z$ and $ b_m,b_{m-1},dotsc,b_0 in 2Bbb{Z}$. That is, $a_i = 2a'_i$ and $b_j = 2b'_j$ for $i = 1,dotsc,n$ and for $j = 1,dotsc,m$. For convenience, suppose $m leq n$ and let $b_j = 0$ for $m < j leq n$ if $m < n$. Thus we may assume $m = n$. We have
            $$begin{align}f(X) - g(X) &= left(a_nX^n + a_{n-1}X^{n-1} + dotsb + a_0right) - left(b_nX^n + b_{n-1}X^{n-1} + dotsb + b_0right)\
            &= (a_n - b_n)X^n + (a_{n-1} - b_{n-1})X^{n-1} + dotsb + (a_0 - b_0)\
            &= 2(a'_n - b'_n)X^n + 2(a'_{n-1} - b'_{n-1})X^{n-1} + dotsb + 2(a'_0 + b'_0) in J.end{align}$$

            Thus $f(X) - g(X) in J$ for $f(X),g(X) in J$ and so $J$ has the structure of an abelian group. That $J$ is closed under multiplication follows similarly, and could prove fruitful to write down explicitly such a problem at least once.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Yes this helps a lot !! I just needed to see how I would write this in a formal proof.
              – H.B
              Nov 19 at 0:55










            • I highly recommend the multiplicative case as an exercise then. I recall elementary symmetric polynomials here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_symmetric_polynomial
              – Thomas Chansler
              Nov 19 at 10:38















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Perhaps it would help to see this problem solved more explicitly. We first note that $0 = 2cdot 0 in J$, so $J neq emptyset$. I will consider the case of $f(X) - g(X)$. Consider $f(X),g(X) in J$. Then we have $f(X) = a_nX^n + a_{n-1}X^{n-1} + dotsb + a_0$ and $g(X) = b_mX^m + b_{m-1}X^{m-1} + dotsb + b_0$ with $a_n,a_{n-1},dotsc,a_0 in 2Bbb Z$ and $ b_m,b_{m-1},dotsc,b_0 in 2Bbb{Z}$. That is, $a_i = 2a'_i$ and $b_j = 2b'_j$ for $i = 1,dotsc,n$ and for $j = 1,dotsc,m$. For convenience, suppose $m leq n$ and let $b_j = 0$ for $m < j leq n$ if $m < n$. Thus we may assume $m = n$. We have
            $$begin{align}f(X) - g(X) &= left(a_nX^n + a_{n-1}X^{n-1} + dotsb + a_0right) - left(b_nX^n + b_{n-1}X^{n-1} + dotsb + b_0right)\
            &= (a_n - b_n)X^n + (a_{n-1} - b_{n-1})X^{n-1} + dotsb + (a_0 - b_0)\
            &= 2(a'_n - b'_n)X^n + 2(a'_{n-1} - b'_{n-1})X^{n-1} + dotsb + 2(a'_0 + b'_0) in J.end{align}$$

            Thus $f(X) - g(X) in J$ for $f(X),g(X) in J$ and so $J$ has the structure of an abelian group. That $J$ is closed under multiplication follows similarly, and could prove fruitful to write down explicitly such a problem at least once.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Yes this helps a lot !! I just needed to see how I would write this in a formal proof.
              – H.B
              Nov 19 at 0:55










            • I highly recommend the multiplicative case as an exercise then. I recall elementary symmetric polynomials here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_symmetric_polynomial
              – Thomas Chansler
              Nov 19 at 10:38













            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            Perhaps it would help to see this problem solved more explicitly. We first note that $0 = 2cdot 0 in J$, so $J neq emptyset$. I will consider the case of $f(X) - g(X)$. Consider $f(X),g(X) in J$. Then we have $f(X) = a_nX^n + a_{n-1}X^{n-1} + dotsb + a_0$ and $g(X) = b_mX^m + b_{m-1}X^{m-1} + dotsb + b_0$ with $a_n,a_{n-1},dotsc,a_0 in 2Bbb Z$ and $ b_m,b_{m-1},dotsc,b_0 in 2Bbb{Z}$. That is, $a_i = 2a'_i$ and $b_j = 2b'_j$ for $i = 1,dotsc,n$ and for $j = 1,dotsc,m$. For convenience, suppose $m leq n$ and let $b_j = 0$ for $m < j leq n$ if $m < n$. Thus we may assume $m = n$. We have
            $$begin{align}f(X) - g(X) &= left(a_nX^n + a_{n-1}X^{n-1} + dotsb + a_0right) - left(b_nX^n + b_{n-1}X^{n-1} + dotsb + b_0right)\
            &= (a_n - b_n)X^n + (a_{n-1} - b_{n-1})X^{n-1} + dotsb + (a_0 - b_0)\
            &= 2(a'_n - b'_n)X^n + 2(a'_{n-1} - b'_{n-1})X^{n-1} + dotsb + 2(a'_0 + b'_0) in J.end{align}$$

            Thus $f(X) - g(X) in J$ for $f(X),g(X) in J$ and so $J$ has the structure of an abelian group. That $J$ is closed under multiplication follows similarly, and could prove fruitful to write down explicitly such a problem at least once.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            Perhaps it would help to see this problem solved more explicitly. We first note that $0 = 2cdot 0 in J$, so $J neq emptyset$. I will consider the case of $f(X) - g(X)$. Consider $f(X),g(X) in J$. Then we have $f(X) = a_nX^n + a_{n-1}X^{n-1} + dotsb + a_0$ and $g(X) = b_mX^m + b_{m-1}X^{m-1} + dotsb + b_0$ with $a_n,a_{n-1},dotsc,a_0 in 2Bbb Z$ and $ b_m,b_{m-1},dotsc,b_0 in 2Bbb{Z}$. That is, $a_i = 2a'_i$ and $b_j = 2b'_j$ for $i = 1,dotsc,n$ and for $j = 1,dotsc,m$. For convenience, suppose $m leq n$ and let $b_j = 0$ for $m < j leq n$ if $m < n$. Thus we may assume $m = n$. We have
            $$begin{align}f(X) - g(X) &= left(a_nX^n + a_{n-1}X^{n-1} + dotsb + a_0right) - left(b_nX^n + b_{n-1}X^{n-1} + dotsb + b_0right)\
            &= (a_n - b_n)X^n + (a_{n-1} - b_{n-1})X^{n-1} + dotsb + (a_0 - b_0)\
            &= 2(a'_n - b'_n)X^n + 2(a'_{n-1} - b'_{n-1})X^{n-1} + dotsb + 2(a'_0 + b'_0) in J.end{align}$$

            Thus $f(X) - g(X) in J$ for $f(X),g(X) in J$ and so $J$ has the structure of an abelian group. That $J$ is closed under multiplication follows similarly, and could prove fruitful to write down explicitly such a problem at least once.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Nov 19 at 0:21









            Thomas Chansler

            204




            204












            • Yes this helps a lot !! I just needed to see how I would write this in a formal proof.
              – H.B
              Nov 19 at 0:55










            • I highly recommend the multiplicative case as an exercise then. I recall elementary symmetric polynomials here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_symmetric_polynomial
              – Thomas Chansler
              Nov 19 at 10:38


















            • Yes this helps a lot !! I just needed to see how I would write this in a formal proof.
              – H.B
              Nov 19 at 0:55










            • I highly recommend the multiplicative case as an exercise then. I recall elementary symmetric polynomials here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_symmetric_polynomial
              – Thomas Chansler
              Nov 19 at 10:38
















            Yes this helps a lot !! I just needed to see how I would write this in a formal proof.
            – H.B
            Nov 19 at 0:55




            Yes this helps a lot !! I just needed to see how I would write this in a formal proof.
            – H.B
            Nov 19 at 0:55












            I highly recommend the multiplicative case as an exercise then. I recall elementary symmetric polynomials here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_symmetric_polynomial
            – Thomas Chansler
            Nov 19 at 10:38




            I highly recommend the multiplicative case as an exercise then. I recall elementary symmetric polynomials here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_symmetric_polynomial
            – Thomas Chansler
            Nov 19 at 10:38


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004284%2fprove-j-is-an-ideal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix

            “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis