Linear algebra question about combination linear transformations











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Suppose that $T : M_{2×2}(Bbb R) rightarrow U_{2×2}(Bbb R)$ and $S : U_{2×2}(Bbb R) rightarrow P_3$ are linear transformations.
Then the composition map $S circ T : M_{2×2}(Bbb R) rightarrow P_3$ is never one-to-one.



To prove this is wrong, I have created a transformation $T$ and $S$ such that the standard matrix for the transformation $S circ T$ has a pivot in every column, and thus, one-to-one. However, I am not sure if I am on the right track or missing something, as this answer seems too easy.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Please help us to help you by explaining your notation. $M_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ could well be the set of of $2 times 2$ matrices with elements in $Bbb{R}$ and $U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ might be the set of upper-triangular matrices. I can't hazard a guess about $P_3$. You need to tell us what the notations mean in your context.
    – Rob Arthan
    Nov 18 at 23:54












  • @RobArthan Hmm... Polynomials of degree at most 3? Then it would be $Bbb R^4to Bbb R^3toBbb R^4$.
    – A.Γ.
    Nov 19 at 0:07












  • @RobArthan U2×2(ℝ) is the set of upper triangular matrices and P3 is the set of polynomials of degree at most 3.
    – question123
    Nov 19 at 0:26










  • @A.Γ. Actually, I knew that with the obvious guess about the meaning $M$ and $U$ it didn't matter what $P_3$ meant, but the OP should have been more conscientious.
    – Rob Arthan
    Nov 19 at 1:03










  • @RobArthan I totally agree with you.
    – A.Γ.
    Nov 19 at 12:57















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Suppose that $T : M_{2×2}(Bbb R) rightarrow U_{2×2}(Bbb R)$ and $S : U_{2×2}(Bbb R) rightarrow P_3$ are linear transformations.
Then the composition map $S circ T : M_{2×2}(Bbb R) rightarrow P_3$ is never one-to-one.



To prove this is wrong, I have created a transformation $T$ and $S$ such that the standard matrix for the transformation $S circ T$ has a pivot in every column, and thus, one-to-one. However, I am not sure if I am on the right track or missing something, as this answer seems too easy.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Please help us to help you by explaining your notation. $M_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ could well be the set of of $2 times 2$ matrices with elements in $Bbb{R}$ and $U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ might be the set of upper-triangular matrices. I can't hazard a guess about $P_3$. You need to tell us what the notations mean in your context.
    – Rob Arthan
    Nov 18 at 23:54












  • @RobArthan Hmm... Polynomials of degree at most 3? Then it would be $Bbb R^4to Bbb R^3toBbb R^4$.
    – A.Γ.
    Nov 19 at 0:07












  • @RobArthan U2×2(ℝ) is the set of upper triangular matrices and P3 is the set of polynomials of degree at most 3.
    – question123
    Nov 19 at 0:26










  • @A.Γ. Actually, I knew that with the obvious guess about the meaning $M$ and $U$ it didn't matter what $P_3$ meant, but the OP should have been more conscientious.
    – Rob Arthan
    Nov 19 at 1:03










  • @RobArthan I totally agree with you.
    – A.Γ.
    Nov 19 at 12:57













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Suppose that $T : M_{2×2}(Bbb R) rightarrow U_{2×2}(Bbb R)$ and $S : U_{2×2}(Bbb R) rightarrow P_3$ are linear transformations.
Then the composition map $S circ T : M_{2×2}(Bbb R) rightarrow P_3$ is never one-to-one.



To prove this is wrong, I have created a transformation $T$ and $S$ such that the standard matrix for the transformation $S circ T$ has a pivot in every column, and thus, one-to-one. However, I am not sure if I am on the right track or missing something, as this answer seems too easy.










share|cite|improve this question















Suppose that $T : M_{2×2}(Bbb R) rightarrow U_{2×2}(Bbb R)$ and $S : U_{2×2}(Bbb R) rightarrow P_3$ are linear transformations.
Then the composition map $S circ T : M_{2×2}(Bbb R) rightarrow P_3$ is never one-to-one.



To prove this is wrong, I have created a transformation $T$ and $S$ such that the standard matrix for the transformation $S circ T$ has a pivot in every column, and thus, one-to-one. However, I am not sure if I am on the right track or missing something, as this answer seems too easy.







linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces linear-transformations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 18 at 23:47









Joey Kilpatrick

1,183422




1,183422










asked Nov 18 at 23:42









question123

11




11












  • Please help us to help you by explaining your notation. $M_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ could well be the set of of $2 times 2$ matrices with elements in $Bbb{R}$ and $U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ might be the set of upper-triangular matrices. I can't hazard a guess about $P_3$. You need to tell us what the notations mean in your context.
    – Rob Arthan
    Nov 18 at 23:54












  • @RobArthan Hmm... Polynomials of degree at most 3? Then it would be $Bbb R^4to Bbb R^3toBbb R^4$.
    – A.Γ.
    Nov 19 at 0:07












  • @RobArthan U2×2(ℝ) is the set of upper triangular matrices and P3 is the set of polynomials of degree at most 3.
    – question123
    Nov 19 at 0:26










  • @A.Γ. Actually, I knew that with the obvious guess about the meaning $M$ and $U$ it didn't matter what $P_3$ meant, but the OP should have been more conscientious.
    – Rob Arthan
    Nov 19 at 1:03










  • @RobArthan I totally agree with you.
    – A.Γ.
    Nov 19 at 12:57


















  • Please help us to help you by explaining your notation. $M_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ could well be the set of of $2 times 2$ matrices with elements in $Bbb{R}$ and $U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ might be the set of upper-triangular matrices. I can't hazard a guess about $P_3$. You need to tell us what the notations mean in your context.
    – Rob Arthan
    Nov 18 at 23:54












  • @RobArthan Hmm... Polynomials of degree at most 3? Then it would be $Bbb R^4to Bbb R^3toBbb R^4$.
    – A.Γ.
    Nov 19 at 0:07












  • @RobArthan U2×2(ℝ) is the set of upper triangular matrices and P3 is the set of polynomials of degree at most 3.
    – question123
    Nov 19 at 0:26










  • @A.Γ. Actually, I knew that with the obvious guess about the meaning $M$ and $U$ it didn't matter what $P_3$ meant, but the OP should have been more conscientious.
    – Rob Arthan
    Nov 19 at 1:03










  • @RobArthan I totally agree with you.
    – A.Γ.
    Nov 19 at 12:57
















Please help us to help you by explaining your notation. $M_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ could well be the set of of $2 times 2$ matrices with elements in $Bbb{R}$ and $U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ might be the set of upper-triangular matrices. I can't hazard a guess about $P_3$. You need to tell us what the notations mean in your context.
– Rob Arthan
Nov 18 at 23:54






Please help us to help you by explaining your notation. $M_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ could well be the set of of $2 times 2$ matrices with elements in $Bbb{R}$ and $U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ might be the set of upper-triangular matrices. I can't hazard a guess about $P_3$. You need to tell us what the notations mean in your context.
– Rob Arthan
Nov 18 at 23:54














@RobArthan Hmm... Polynomials of degree at most 3? Then it would be $Bbb R^4to Bbb R^3toBbb R^4$.
– A.Γ.
Nov 19 at 0:07






@RobArthan Hmm... Polynomials of degree at most 3? Then it would be $Bbb R^4to Bbb R^3toBbb R^4$.
– A.Γ.
Nov 19 at 0:07














@RobArthan U2×2(ℝ) is the set of upper triangular matrices and P3 is the set of polynomials of degree at most 3.
– question123
Nov 19 at 0:26




@RobArthan U2×2(ℝ) is the set of upper triangular matrices and P3 is the set of polynomials of degree at most 3.
– question123
Nov 19 at 0:26












@A.Γ. Actually, I knew that with the obvious guess about the meaning $M$ and $U$ it didn't matter what $P_3$ meant, but the OP should have been more conscientious.
– Rob Arthan
Nov 19 at 1:03




@A.Γ. Actually, I knew that with the obvious guess about the meaning $M$ and $U$ it didn't matter what $P_3$ meant, but the OP should have been more conscientious.
– Rob Arthan
Nov 19 at 1:03












@RobArthan I totally agree with you.
– A.Γ.
Nov 19 at 12:57




@RobArthan I totally agree with you.
– A.Γ.
Nov 19 at 12:57










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Following your comment clarifying the notation:



$M_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ ($2times2$ matrices with real number entries) is a $4$-dimensional vector space over $Bbb{R}$. $U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ (upper-triangular $2times2$ matrices with real number entries) is a $3$-dimensional vector space over $Bbb{R}$.



Any linear transformation $T : M_{2times2}(Bbb{R}) to U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ must have a kernel of dimension at least $1$. So for any real vector space $V$ and any linear transformatiom $S : U_{2times2}(Bbb{R}) to V$, the composite $S circ T$ will have a non-trivial kernel and hence will not be one-one.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004296%2flinear-algebra-question-about-combination-linear-transformations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Following your comment clarifying the notation:



    $M_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ ($2times2$ matrices with real number entries) is a $4$-dimensional vector space over $Bbb{R}$. $U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ (upper-triangular $2times2$ matrices with real number entries) is a $3$-dimensional vector space over $Bbb{R}$.



    Any linear transformation $T : M_{2times2}(Bbb{R}) to U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ must have a kernel of dimension at least $1$. So for any real vector space $V$ and any linear transformatiom $S : U_{2times2}(Bbb{R}) to V$, the composite $S circ T$ will have a non-trivial kernel and hence will not be one-one.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Following your comment clarifying the notation:



      $M_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ ($2times2$ matrices with real number entries) is a $4$-dimensional vector space over $Bbb{R}$. $U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ (upper-triangular $2times2$ matrices with real number entries) is a $3$-dimensional vector space over $Bbb{R}$.



      Any linear transformation $T : M_{2times2}(Bbb{R}) to U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ must have a kernel of dimension at least $1$. So for any real vector space $V$ and any linear transformatiom $S : U_{2times2}(Bbb{R}) to V$, the composite $S circ T$ will have a non-trivial kernel and hence will not be one-one.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Following your comment clarifying the notation:



        $M_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ ($2times2$ matrices with real number entries) is a $4$-dimensional vector space over $Bbb{R}$. $U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ (upper-triangular $2times2$ matrices with real number entries) is a $3$-dimensional vector space over $Bbb{R}$.



        Any linear transformation $T : M_{2times2}(Bbb{R}) to U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ must have a kernel of dimension at least $1$. So for any real vector space $V$ and any linear transformatiom $S : U_{2times2}(Bbb{R}) to V$, the composite $S circ T$ will have a non-trivial kernel and hence will not be one-one.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Following your comment clarifying the notation:



        $M_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ ($2times2$ matrices with real number entries) is a $4$-dimensional vector space over $Bbb{R}$. $U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ (upper-triangular $2times2$ matrices with real number entries) is a $3$-dimensional vector space over $Bbb{R}$.



        Any linear transformation $T : M_{2times2}(Bbb{R}) to U_{2times2}(Bbb{R})$ must have a kernel of dimension at least $1$. So for any real vector space $V$ and any linear transformatiom $S : U_{2times2}(Bbb{R}) to V$, the composite $S circ T$ will have a non-trivial kernel and hence will not be one-one.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 19 at 0:57

























        answered Nov 19 at 0:52









        Rob Arthan

        28.6k42865




        28.6k42865






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004296%2flinear-algebra-question-about-combination-linear-transformations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Aardman Animations

            Are they similar matrix

            “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis