Computing projective resolutions over quotients of polynomial rings











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2












I'd like to find projective resolutions for $k$ considered as an $R$-module,
where $k$ is a field and $R$ as follows:



(i) $R=frac{k[x]}{(x^n)}$;



(ii) $R=k[x,y]$



(iii) $R=frac{k[x,y]}{(x^n,y^m)}$;



(iv) $ R=frac{k[x,y]}{(x^2,y^2,xy)}$.



I try to find free resolutions, because I don't know any obvious projective non-free modules over these rings:



For (i), I've found:
$$ ldots rightarrow R xrightarrow{cdot x} R xrightarrow{cdot x^{n-1}} R xrightarrow{cdot x} R rightarrow k rightarrow 0$$



For (ii), I've found:
$$ 0 xrightarrow{cdot x} R xrightarrow{1mapsto(y,-x)} Roplus R xrightarrow{(1,0)mapsto x, (0,1) mapsto y} R rightarrow k rightarrow 0$$



For (iii), I think it should end similarly to (ii), but I'm not sure what comes before:
$$ ? xrightarrow{} R xrightarrow{1mapsto(y,-x)} Roplus R xrightarrow{(1,0)mapsto x, (0,1) mapsto y} R rightarrow k rightarrow 0$$



Are these correct?



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite
    2












    I'd like to find projective resolutions for $k$ considered as an $R$-module,
    where $k$ is a field and $R$ as follows:



    (i) $R=frac{k[x]}{(x^n)}$;



    (ii) $R=k[x,y]$



    (iii) $R=frac{k[x,y]}{(x^n,y^m)}$;



    (iv) $ R=frac{k[x,y]}{(x^2,y^2,xy)}$.



    I try to find free resolutions, because I don't know any obvious projective non-free modules over these rings:



    For (i), I've found:
    $$ ldots rightarrow R xrightarrow{cdot x} R xrightarrow{cdot x^{n-1}} R xrightarrow{cdot x} R rightarrow k rightarrow 0$$



    For (ii), I've found:
    $$ 0 xrightarrow{cdot x} R xrightarrow{1mapsto(y,-x)} Roplus R xrightarrow{(1,0)mapsto x, (0,1) mapsto y} R rightarrow k rightarrow 0$$



    For (iii), I think it should end similarly to (ii), but I'm not sure what comes before:
    $$ ? xrightarrow{} R xrightarrow{1mapsto(y,-x)} Roplus R xrightarrow{(1,0)mapsto x, (0,1) mapsto y} R rightarrow k rightarrow 0$$



    Are these correct?



    Thanks in advance.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      2









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      2






      2





      I'd like to find projective resolutions for $k$ considered as an $R$-module,
      where $k$ is a field and $R$ as follows:



      (i) $R=frac{k[x]}{(x^n)}$;



      (ii) $R=k[x,y]$



      (iii) $R=frac{k[x,y]}{(x^n,y^m)}$;



      (iv) $ R=frac{k[x,y]}{(x^2,y^2,xy)}$.



      I try to find free resolutions, because I don't know any obvious projective non-free modules over these rings:



      For (i), I've found:
      $$ ldots rightarrow R xrightarrow{cdot x} R xrightarrow{cdot x^{n-1}} R xrightarrow{cdot x} R rightarrow k rightarrow 0$$



      For (ii), I've found:
      $$ 0 xrightarrow{cdot x} R xrightarrow{1mapsto(y,-x)} Roplus R xrightarrow{(1,0)mapsto x, (0,1) mapsto y} R rightarrow k rightarrow 0$$



      For (iii), I think it should end similarly to (ii), but I'm not sure what comes before:
      $$ ? xrightarrow{} R xrightarrow{1mapsto(y,-x)} Roplus R xrightarrow{(1,0)mapsto x, (0,1) mapsto y} R rightarrow k rightarrow 0$$



      Are these correct?



      Thanks in advance.










      share|cite|improve this question















      I'd like to find projective resolutions for $k$ considered as an $R$-module,
      where $k$ is a field and $R$ as follows:



      (i) $R=frac{k[x]}{(x^n)}$;



      (ii) $R=k[x,y]$



      (iii) $R=frac{k[x,y]}{(x^n,y^m)}$;



      (iv) $ R=frac{k[x,y]}{(x^2,y^2,xy)}$.



      I try to find free resolutions, because I don't know any obvious projective non-free modules over these rings:



      For (i), I've found:
      $$ ldots rightarrow R xrightarrow{cdot x} R xrightarrow{cdot x^{n-1}} R xrightarrow{cdot x} R rightarrow k rightarrow 0$$



      For (ii), I've found:
      $$ 0 xrightarrow{cdot x} R xrightarrow{1mapsto(y,-x)} Roplus R xrightarrow{(1,0)mapsto x, (0,1) mapsto y} R rightarrow k rightarrow 0$$



      For (iii), I think it should end similarly to (ii), but I'm not sure what comes before:
      $$ ? xrightarrow{} R xrightarrow{1mapsto(y,-x)} Roplus R xrightarrow{(1,0)mapsto x, (0,1) mapsto y} R rightarrow k rightarrow 0$$



      Are these correct?



      Thanks in advance.







      ring-theory commutative-algebra modules homology-cohomology homological-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 20 at 0:17









      Sky

      1,213212




      1,213212










      asked Nov 18 at 22:22









      SSF

      317110




      317110






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          For (i), your resolution works. Let me call it $P(n) to mathbb k$. Your resolution for (ii) works too, it is called the Koszul resolution. Now note that if the corresponding algebra is $A(n)$, then $A(n)otimes A(m)$ is the algebra in (iii). Since tensoring over $mathbb k$ is exact, it follows that $P(n)otimes P(m)$ is a resolution of the trival module in this case. This is a complex that has in degree $d$ the sum $P(n)_iotimes P(n)_j$ where $i+j=d$.



          Finally, let me do (iv) explicitly. This algebra $A$ has dimension 3, spanned by 1,$x$ and $y$, and we can begin the resolution by $A^2to Ato mathbb k$ where $f:A^2to A$ covers $K=ker(Ato mathbb k) = (x,y)$ by sending $(p,q)$ to $xp+yq$. The kernel of this is easy to work out: since in this algebra $xp = xp(0,0)$ and $y q= y q(0,0)$, this map has kernel the pairs $(p,q)$ that both vanish at zero. Thus the kernel of $f$ is $Koplus K$, which we can cover by $foplus f$. Repeating, we arrive at a minimal free resolution



          $$ cdots to A^8to A^4to A^2to A.$$



          This is consistent with the fact that we can present $A$ by two free generators $x,y$ and monomial relations $x^2,xy,yx,y^2$, which generate $2^{n+1}$ Anick $n$-chains for each $ninmathbb N_0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            I will give part solution to your question, this is what I can do.
            For (i), and (ii) the resolution you gave is right. More general, you can get the free resolution of $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ by tensoring $n$-copies $k[x_1,...,x_n]xrightarrow {x_i}k[x_1,...,x_n]$ then we can get an acyclic complex which is called Koszul complex, and it is a resolution of $k$.



            For (iv) $k[x,y]/{(x,y)^2}$ is a finite dimensional local algebra and radical square zero, so any kernel of a projective cover is semisimple. There is only one simple module $k$. If we get the short exact sequence $0rightarrow kcoprod kcong (x,y)/{(x,y)^2}xrightarrow {inc}k[x,y]/{(x,y)^2}rightarrow krightarrow 0$. So the projective dimension of $k$ is infinite.



            For (iii), giving a concrete projective resolution is difficult I think. I am expecting someone can give one. Denote $A=k[x,y]/{(x^n,y^m)}$ is finite dimensional local algebra. Next I will give a proof that $A$ is self-injective and projective dimension of $k$ is $infty$. Remark that $k[x,y]/{(x,y)^2}$ is not self-injective, this can be check directly by Baer's criterion.




            In general, suppose $B$ is finite dimensional local commutative k-algebra, where k is a field. If $mathrm{soc}(B)$ is simple, then $B$ is self-injective.




            Proof: $mathrm{soc}(B)rightarrow B$ is essential extension. Select a injective envelope of $mathrm{soc}(B)$, and denote it by $I(mathrm{soc}(B))$, so there is a natural induced map $alpha :Brightarrow I(mathrm{soc}(B))$. This is a monomorphism since essential extension. Remark $D=mathrm{Hom}_k(-,k):B-mathrm{mod}rightarrow B-mathrm{mod}$ is equivalence between finite generated modules. So $D(I(mathrm{soc}(B))$ and $B$ are both projective covers of the unique simple module of $B$. Hence they have the same length. So $alpha $ is isomorphism.




            The global dimension of a self-injective algebra is $0$ or $infty$.




            So we know projective dimension of $k$ as $A$ is infinite since there is only one simple module $A-mathrm{mod}$ and $A$ is finite dimensional algebra.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Hi, thanks very much for the reply. I'm not familiar with lots of these terms (local algebra, projective cover, soc, self-injective algebra). May I ask what good textbook/source is there to learn these terms?
              – SSF
              Nov 19 at 1:52








            • 1




              @SSF local means it has only one maximal ideal.Radical,socle ,projective cover you can find in Wikipedia ,homological algebra ,Rings modules and categories.Of course,Wikipedia is very convenient.
              – Sky
              Nov 19 at 2:12








            • 1




              Rings and Categories of Modules.GTM13
              – Sky
              Nov 19 at 2:21











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004213%2fcomputing-projective-resolutions-over-quotients-of-polynomial-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote



            accepted










            For (i), your resolution works. Let me call it $P(n) to mathbb k$. Your resolution for (ii) works too, it is called the Koszul resolution. Now note that if the corresponding algebra is $A(n)$, then $A(n)otimes A(m)$ is the algebra in (iii). Since tensoring over $mathbb k$ is exact, it follows that $P(n)otimes P(m)$ is a resolution of the trival module in this case. This is a complex that has in degree $d$ the sum $P(n)_iotimes P(n)_j$ where $i+j=d$.



            Finally, let me do (iv) explicitly. This algebra $A$ has dimension 3, spanned by 1,$x$ and $y$, and we can begin the resolution by $A^2to Ato mathbb k$ where $f:A^2to A$ covers $K=ker(Ato mathbb k) = (x,y)$ by sending $(p,q)$ to $xp+yq$. The kernel of this is easy to work out: since in this algebra $xp = xp(0,0)$ and $y q= y q(0,0)$, this map has kernel the pairs $(p,q)$ that both vanish at zero. Thus the kernel of $f$ is $Koplus K$, which we can cover by $foplus f$. Repeating, we arrive at a minimal free resolution



            $$ cdots to A^8to A^4to A^2to A.$$



            This is consistent with the fact that we can present $A$ by two free generators $x,y$ and monomial relations $x^2,xy,yx,y^2$, which generate $2^{n+1}$ Anick $n$-chains for each $ninmathbb N_0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              0
              down vote



              accepted










              For (i), your resolution works. Let me call it $P(n) to mathbb k$. Your resolution for (ii) works too, it is called the Koszul resolution. Now note that if the corresponding algebra is $A(n)$, then $A(n)otimes A(m)$ is the algebra in (iii). Since tensoring over $mathbb k$ is exact, it follows that $P(n)otimes P(m)$ is a resolution of the trival module in this case. This is a complex that has in degree $d$ the sum $P(n)_iotimes P(n)_j$ where $i+j=d$.



              Finally, let me do (iv) explicitly. This algebra $A$ has dimension 3, spanned by 1,$x$ and $y$, and we can begin the resolution by $A^2to Ato mathbb k$ where $f:A^2to A$ covers $K=ker(Ato mathbb k) = (x,y)$ by sending $(p,q)$ to $xp+yq$. The kernel of this is easy to work out: since in this algebra $xp = xp(0,0)$ and $y q= y q(0,0)$, this map has kernel the pairs $(p,q)$ that both vanish at zero. Thus the kernel of $f$ is $Koplus K$, which we can cover by $foplus f$. Repeating, we arrive at a minimal free resolution



              $$ cdots to A^8to A^4to A^2to A.$$



              This is consistent with the fact that we can present $A$ by two free generators $x,y$ and monomial relations $x^2,xy,yx,y^2$, which generate $2^{n+1}$ Anick $n$-chains for each $ninmathbb N_0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                0
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                0
                down vote



                accepted






                For (i), your resolution works. Let me call it $P(n) to mathbb k$. Your resolution for (ii) works too, it is called the Koszul resolution. Now note that if the corresponding algebra is $A(n)$, then $A(n)otimes A(m)$ is the algebra in (iii). Since tensoring over $mathbb k$ is exact, it follows that $P(n)otimes P(m)$ is a resolution of the trival module in this case. This is a complex that has in degree $d$ the sum $P(n)_iotimes P(n)_j$ where $i+j=d$.



                Finally, let me do (iv) explicitly. This algebra $A$ has dimension 3, spanned by 1,$x$ and $y$, and we can begin the resolution by $A^2to Ato mathbb k$ where $f:A^2to A$ covers $K=ker(Ato mathbb k) = (x,y)$ by sending $(p,q)$ to $xp+yq$. The kernel of this is easy to work out: since in this algebra $xp = xp(0,0)$ and $y q= y q(0,0)$, this map has kernel the pairs $(p,q)$ that both vanish at zero. Thus the kernel of $f$ is $Koplus K$, which we can cover by $foplus f$. Repeating, we arrive at a minimal free resolution



                $$ cdots to A^8to A^4to A^2to A.$$



                This is consistent with the fact that we can present $A$ by two free generators $x,y$ and monomial relations $x^2,xy,yx,y^2$, which generate $2^{n+1}$ Anick $n$-chains for each $ninmathbb N_0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                For (i), your resolution works. Let me call it $P(n) to mathbb k$. Your resolution for (ii) works too, it is called the Koszul resolution. Now note that if the corresponding algebra is $A(n)$, then $A(n)otimes A(m)$ is the algebra in (iii). Since tensoring over $mathbb k$ is exact, it follows that $P(n)otimes P(m)$ is a resolution of the trival module in this case. This is a complex that has in degree $d$ the sum $P(n)_iotimes P(n)_j$ where $i+j=d$.



                Finally, let me do (iv) explicitly. This algebra $A$ has dimension 3, spanned by 1,$x$ and $y$, and we can begin the resolution by $A^2to Ato mathbb k$ where $f:A^2to A$ covers $K=ker(Ato mathbb k) = (x,y)$ by sending $(p,q)$ to $xp+yq$. The kernel of this is easy to work out: since in this algebra $xp = xp(0,0)$ and $y q= y q(0,0)$, this map has kernel the pairs $(p,q)$ that both vanish at zero. Thus the kernel of $f$ is $Koplus K$, which we can cover by $foplus f$. Repeating, we arrive at a minimal free resolution



                $$ cdots to A^8to A^4to A^2to A.$$



                This is consistent with the fact that we can present $A$ by two free generators $x,y$ and monomial relations $x^2,xy,yx,y^2$, which generate $2^{n+1}$ Anick $n$-chains for each $ninmathbb N_0$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 19 at 14:39









                Pedro Tamaroff

                95.7k10150295




                95.7k10150295






















                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    I will give part solution to your question, this is what I can do.
                    For (i), and (ii) the resolution you gave is right. More general, you can get the free resolution of $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ by tensoring $n$-copies $k[x_1,...,x_n]xrightarrow {x_i}k[x_1,...,x_n]$ then we can get an acyclic complex which is called Koszul complex, and it is a resolution of $k$.



                    For (iv) $k[x,y]/{(x,y)^2}$ is a finite dimensional local algebra and radical square zero, so any kernel of a projective cover is semisimple. There is only one simple module $k$. If we get the short exact sequence $0rightarrow kcoprod kcong (x,y)/{(x,y)^2}xrightarrow {inc}k[x,y]/{(x,y)^2}rightarrow krightarrow 0$. So the projective dimension of $k$ is infinite.



                    For (iii), giving a concrete projective resolution is difficult I think. I am expecting someone can give one. Denote $A=k[x,y]/{(x^n,y^m)}$ is finite dimensional local algebra. Next I will give a proof that $A$ is self-injective and projective dimension of $k$ is $infty$. Remark that $k[x,y]/{(x,y)^2}$ is not self-injective, this can be check directly by Baer's criterion.




                    In general, suppose $B$ is finite dimensional local commutative k-algebra, where k is a field. If $mathrm{soc}(B)$ is simple, then $B$ is self-injective.




                    Proof: $mathrm{soc}(B)rightarrow B$ is essential extension. Select a injective envelope of $mathrm{soc}(B)$, and denote it by $I(mathrm{soc}(B))$, so there is a natural induced map $alpha :Brightarrow I(mathrm{soc}(B))$. This is a monomorphism since essential extension. Remark $D=mathrm{Hom}_k(-,k):B-mathrm{mod}rightarrow B-mathrm{mod}$ is equivalence between finite generated modules. So $D(I(mathrm{soc}(B))$ and $B$ are both projective covers of the unique simple module of $B$. Hence they have the same length. So $alpha $ is isomorphism.




                    The global dimension of a self-injective algebra is $0$ or $infty$.




                    So we know projective dimension of $k$ as $A$ is infinite since there is only one simple module $A-mathrm{mod}$ and $A$ is finite dimensional algebra.






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                    • Hi, thanks very much for the reply. I'm not familiar with lots of these terms (local algebra, projective cover, soc, self-injective algebra). May I ask what good textbook/source is there to learn these terms?
                      – SSF
                      Nov 19 at 1:52








                    • 1




                      @SSF local means it has only one maximal ideal.Radical,socle ,projective cover you can find in Wikipedia ,homological algebra ,Rings modules and categories.Of course,Wikipedia is very convenient.
                      – Sky
                      Nov 19 at 2:12








                    • 1




                      Rings and Categories of Modules.GTM13
                      – Sky
                      Nov 19 at 2:21















                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    I will give part solution to your question, this is what I can do.
                    For (i), and (ii) the resolution you gave is right. More general, you can get the free resolution of $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ by tensoring $n$-copies $k[x_1,...,x_n]xrightarrow {x_i}k[x_1,...,x_n]$ then we can get an acyclic complex which is called Koszul complex, and it is a resolution of $k$.



                    For (iv) $k[x,y]/{(x,y)^2}$ is a finite dimensional local algebra and radical square zero, so any kernel of a projective cover is semisimple. There is only one simple module $k$. If we get the short exact sequence $0rightarrow kcoprod kcong (x,y)/{(x,y)^2}xrightarrow {inc}k[x,y]/{(x,y)^2}rightarrow krightarrow 0$. So the projective dimension of $k$ is infinite.



                    For (iii), giving a concrete projective resolution is difficult I think. I am expecting someone can give one. Denote $A=k[x,y]/{(x^n,y^m)}$ is finite dimensional local algebra. Next I will give a proof that $A$ is self-injective and projective dimension of $k$ is $infty$. Remark that $k[x,y]/{(x,y)^2}$ is not self-injective, this can be check directly by Baer's criterion.




                    In general, suppose $B$ is finite dimensional local commutative k-algebra, where k is a field. If $mathrm{soc}(B)$ is simple, then $B$ is self-injective.




                    Proof: $mathrm{soc}(B)rightarrow B$ is essential extension. Select a injective envelope of $mathrm{soc}(B)$, and denote it by $I(mathrm{soc}(B))$, so there is a natural induced map $alpha :Brightarrow I(mathrm{soc}(B))$. This is a monomorphism since essential extension. Remark $D=mathrm{Hom}_k(-,k):B-mathrm{mod}rightarrow B-mathrm{mod}$ is equivalence between finite generated modules. So $D(I(mathrm{soc}(B))$ and $B$ are both projective covers of the unique simple module of $B$. Hence they have the same length. So $alpha $ is isomorphism.




                    The global dimension of a self-injective algebra is $0$ or $infty$.




                    So we know projective dimension of $k$ as $A$ is infinite since there is only one simple module $A-mathrm{mod}$ and $A$ is finite dimensional algebra.






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                    • Hi, thanks very much for the reply. I'm not familiar with lots of these terms (local algebra, projective cover, soc, self-injective algebra). May I ask what good textbook/source is there to learn these terms?
                      – SSF
                      Nov 19 at 1:52








                    • 1




                      @SSF local means it has only one maximal ideal.Radical,socle ,projective cover you can find in Wikipedia ,homological algebra ,Rings modules and categories.Of course,Wikipedia is very convenient.
                      – Sky
                      Nov 19 at 2:12








                    • 1




                      Rings and Categories of Modules.GTM13
                      – Sky
                      Nov 19 at 2:21













                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    I will give part solution to your question, this is what I can do.
                    For (i), and (ii) the resolution you gave is right. More general, you can get the free resolution of $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ by tensoring $n$-copies $k[x_1,...,x_n]xrightarrow {x_i}k[x_1,...,x_n]$ then we can get an acyclic complex which is called Koszul complex, and it is a resolution of $k$.



                    For (iv) $k[x,y]/{(x,y)^2}$ is a finite dimensional local algebra and radical square zero, so any kernel of a projective cover is semisimple. There is only one simple module $k$. If we get the short exact sequence $0rightarrow kcoprod kcong (x,y)/{(x,y)^2}xrightarrow {inc}k[x,y]/{(x,y)^2}rightarrow krightarrow 0$. So the projective dimension of $k$ is infinite.



                    For (iii), giving a concrete projective resolution is difficult I think. I am expecting someone can give one. Denote $A=k[x,y]/{(x^n,y^m)}$ is finite dimensional local algebra. Next I will give a proof that $A$ is self-injective and projective dimension of $k$ is $infty$. Remark that $k[x,y]/{(x,y)^2}$ is not self-injective, this can be check directly by Baer's criterion.




                    In general, suppose $B$ is finite dimensional local commutative k-algebra, where k is a field. If $mathrm{soc}(B)$ is simple, then $B$ is self-injective.




                    Proof: $mathrm{soc}(B)rightarrow B$ is essential extension. Select a injective envelope of $mathrm{soc}(B)$, and denote it by $I(mathrm{soc}(B))$, so there is a natural induced map $alpha :Brightarrow I(mathrm{soc}(B))$. This is a monomorphism since essential extension. Remark $D=mathrm{Hom}_k(-,k):B-mathrm{mod}rightarrow B-mathrm{mod}$ is equivalence between finite generated modules. So $D(I(mathrm{soc}(B))$ and $B$ are both projective covers of the unique simple module of $B$. Hence they have the same length. So $alpha $ is isomorphism.




                    The global dimension of a self-injective algebra is $0$ or $infty$.




                    So we know projective dimension of $k$ as $A$ is infinite since there is only one simple module $A-mathrm{mod}$ and $A$ is finite dimensional algebra.






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    I will give part solution to your question, this is what I can do.
                    For (i), and (ii) the resolution you gave is right. More general, you can get the free resolution of $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ by tensoring $n$-copies $k[x_1,...,x_n]xrightarrow {x_i}k[x_1,...,x_n]$ then we can get an acyclic complex which is called Koszul complex, and it is a resolution of $k$.



                    For (iv) $k[x,y]/{(x,y)^2}$ is a finite dimensional local algebra and radical square zero, so any kernel of a projective cover is semisimple. There is only one simple module $k$. If we get the short exact sequence $0rightarrow kcoprod kcong (x,y)/{(x,y)^2}xrightarrow {inc}k[x,y]/{(x,y)^2}rightarrow krightarrow 0$. So the projective dimension of $k$ is infinite.



                    For (iii), giving a concrete projective resolution is difficult I think. I am expecting someone can give one. Denote $A=k[x,y]/{(x^n,y^m)}$ is finite dimensional local algebra. Next I will give a proof that $A$ is self-injective and projective dimension of $k$ is $infty$. Remark that $k[x,y]/{(x,y)^2}$ is not self-injective, this can be check directly by Baer's criterion.




                    In general, suppose $B$ is finite dimensional local commutative k-algebra, where k is a field. If $mathrm{soc}(B)$ is simple, then $B$ is self-injective.




                    Proof: $mathrm{soc}(B)rightarrow B$ is essential extension. Select a injective envelope of $mathrm{soc}(B)$, and denote it by $I(mathrm{soc}(B))$, so there is a natural induced map $alpha :Brightarrow I(mathrm{soc}(B))$. This is a monomorphism since essential extension. Remark $D=mathrm{Hom}_k(-,k):B-mathrm{mod}rightarrow B-mathrm{mod}$ is equivalence between finite generated modules. So $D(I(mathrm{soc}(B))$ and $B$ are both projective covers of the unique simple module of $B$. Hence they have the same length. So $alpha $ is isomorphism.




                    The global dimension of a self-injective algebra is $0$ or $infty$.




                    So we know projective dimension of $k$ as $A$ is infinite since there is only one simple module $A-mathrm{mod}$ and $A$ is finite dimensional algebra.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Nov 20 at 15:34









                    user26857

                    39.2k123882




                    39.2k123882










                    answered Nov 19 at 1:18









                    Sky

                    1,213212




                    1,213212












                    • Hi, thanks very much for the reply. I'm not familiar with lots of these terms (local algebra, projective cover, soc, self-injective algebra). May I ask what good textbook/source is there to learn these terms?
                      – SSF
                      Nov 19 at 1:52








                    • 1




                      @SSF local means it has only one maximal ideal.Radical,socle ,projective cover you can find in Wikipedia ,homological algebra ,Rings modules and categories.Of course,Wikipedia is very convenient.
                      – Sky
                      Nov 19 at 2:12








                    • 1




                      Rings and Categories of Modules.GTM13
                      – Sky
                      Nov 19 at 2:21


















                    • Hi, thanks very much for the reply. I'm not familiar with lots of these terms (local algebra, projective cover, soc, self-injective algebra). May I ask what good textbook/source is there to learn these terms?
                      – SSF
                      Nov 19 at 1:52








                    • 1




                      @SSF local means it has only one maximal ideal.Radical,socle ,projective cover you can find in Wikipedia ,homological algebra ,Rings modules and categories.Of course,Wikipedia is very convenient.
                      – Sky
                      Nov 19 at 2:12








                    • 1




                      Rings and Categories of Modules.GTM13
                      – Sky
                      Nov 19 at 2:21
















                    Hi, thanks very much for the reply. I'm not familiar with lots of these terms (local algebra, projective cover, soc, self-injective algebra). May I ask what good textbook/source is there to learn these terms?
                    – SSF
                    Nov 19 at 1:52






                    Hi, thanks very much for the reply. I'm not familiar with lots of these terms (local algebra, projective cover, soc, self-injective algebra). May I ask what good textbook/source is there to learn these terms?
                    – SSF
                    Nov 19 at 1:52






                    1




                    1




                    @SSF local means it has only one maximal ideal.Radical,socle ,projective cover you can find in Wikipedia ,homological algebra ,Rings modules and categories.Of course,Wikipedia is very convenient.
                    – Sky
                    Nov 19 at 2:12






                    @SSF local means it has only one maximal ideal.Radical,socle ,projective cover you can find in Wikipedia ,homological algebra ,Rings modules and categories.Of course,Wikipedia is very convenient.
                    – Sky
                    Nov 19 at 2:12






                    1




                    1




                    Rings and Categories of Modules.GTM13
                    – Sky
                    Nov 19 at 2:21




                    Rings and Categories of Modules.GTM13
                    – Sky
                    Nov 19 at 2:21


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004213%2fcomputing-projective-resolutions-over-quotients-of-polynomial-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Aardman Animations

                    Are they similar matrix

                    “minimization” problem in Euclidean space related to orthonormal basis