Proof without words of the Quadratic Formula?
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
As suggested by @Moti and @YvesDaoust in this post, a simple way to identify the roots (red dots) of a parabola (given focus and directrix, blue) by means of straightedge and compass is to draw the circle with center in the focus and radius the distance $overline{HI}$ between the $x$-axis and the directrix.
Now, consider the Quadratic Formula
$$
color{red}{x_{pm}}=frac{-bpmsqrt{b^2-4a cdot mathbf{c} }}{2a}.
$$
In the above image (a part the roots), it is easy to spot the term $mathbf{c}$, i.e. the intercept of the parabola with the $y$-axis.
My question is:
How to geometrically illustrate the other various algebraic terms of the quadratic formula by means of this construction, is such a way that the algebraic relation results immediately evident?
With geometrically, I mean some visual intuition, based on such plot (or something similar), in the spirit of a "proof without words".
Thanks for your help!
geometry quadratics conic-sections education visualization
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
As suggested by @Moti and @YvesDaoust in this post, a simple way to identify the roots (red dots) of a parabola (given focus and directrix, blue) by means of straightedge and compass is to draw the circle with center in the focus and radius the distance $overline{HI}$ between the $x$-axis and the directrix.
Now, consider the Quadratic Formula
$$
color{red}{x_{pm}}=frac{-bpmsqrt{b^2-4a cdot mathbf{c} }}{2a}.
$$
In the above image (a part the roots), it is easy to spot the term $mathbf{c}$, i.e. the intercept of the parabola with the $y$-axis.
My question is:
How to geometrically illustrate the other various algebraic terms of the quadratic formula by means of this construction, is such a way that the algebraic relation results immediately evident?
With geometrically, I mean some visual intuition, based on such plot (or something similar), in the spirit of a "proof without words".
Thanks for your help!
geometry quadratics conic-sections education visualization
1
An obvious interpretation of one of the terms is that $-b/2a$ is the x coordinate of the vertex and thus the location of point H.
– Daniel Gendin
Nov 14 at 20:27
@DanielGendin The more obvious, the better! Thanks!
– user559615
Nov 14 at 20:35
2
I prefer to write the quadratic formula as $x=frac{-b}{2a}pmsqrt{left(frac{-b}{2a}right)^2-frac{c}{a}}$. Thanks to Daniel's comment we already know what $-b/2a$ is. Now there is only $c/a$ left to explain.
– Rahul
Nov 14 at 20:37
@Rahul True. Good observation. But "where" is $a$? Of course, I know that it is the amplitude of the parabola, but I cannot easily show its exact value on this plot. However, $c/a$ suggests me the ratio between two sides of a triangle...
– user559615
Nov 14 at 20:45
1
I don't see how. But here's an observation: The tangent from the $y$-intercept meets the $x$-axis at a point $J$ with abscissa $-c/b$. Then $2|OH|,|OJ|=2(-b/2a)(-c/b)=c/a$. Not sure if this helps.
– Rahul
Nov 16 at 5:16
|
show 5 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
As suggested by @Moti and @YvesDaoust in this post, a simple way to identify the roots (red dots) of a parabola (given focus and directrix, blue) by means of straightedge and compass is to draw the circle with center in the focus and radius the distance $overline{HI}$ between the $x$-axis and the directrix.
Now, consider the Quadratic Formula
$$
color{red}{x_{pm}}=frac{-bpmsqrt{b^2-4a cdot mathbf{c} }}{2a}.
$$
In the above image (a part the roots), it is easy to spot the term $mathbf{c}$, i.e. the intercept of the parabola with the $y$-axis.
My question is:
How to geometrically illustrate the other various algebraic terms of the quadratic formula by means of this construction, is such a way that the algebraic relation results immediately evident?
With geometrically, I mean some visual intuition, based on such plot (or something similar), in the spirit of a "proof without words".
Thanks for your help!
geometry quadratics conic-sections education visualization
As suggested by @Moti and @YvesDaoust in this post, a simple way to identify the roots (red dots) of a parabola (given focus and directrix, blue) by means of straightedge and compass is to draw the circle with center in the focus and radius the distance $overline{HI}$ between the $x$-axis and the directrix.
Now, consider the Quadratic Formula
$$
color{red}{x_{pm}}=frac{-bpmsqrt{b^2-4a cdot mathbf{c} }}{2a}.
$$
In the above image (a part the roots), it is easy to spot the term $mathbf{c}$, i.e. the intercept of the parabola with the $y$-axis.
My question is:
How to geometrically illustrate the other various algebraic terms of the quadratic formula by means of this construction, is such a way that the algebraic relation results immediately evident?
With geometrically, I mean some visual intuition, based on such plot (or something similar), in the spirit of a "proof without words".
Thanks for your help!
geometry quadratics conic-sections education visualization
geometry quadratics conic-sections education visualization
edited Nov 16 at 14:06
asked Nov 14 at 18:49
user559615
1
An obvious interpretation of one of the terms is that $-b/2a$ is the x coordinate of the vertex and thus the location of point H.
– Daniel Gendin
Nov 14 at 20:27
@DanielGendin The more obvious, the better! Thanks!
– user559615
Nov 14 at 20:35
2
I prefer to write the quadratic formula as $x=frac{-b}{2a}pmsqrt{left(frac{-b}{2a}right)^2-frac{c}{a}}$. Thanks to Daniel's comment we already know what $-b/2a$ is. Now there is only $c/a$ left to explain.
– Rahul
Nov 14 at 20:37
@Rahul True. Good observation. But "where" is $a$? Of course, I know that it is the amplitude of the parabola, but I cannot easily show its exact value on this plot. However, $c/a$ suggests me the ratio between two sides of a triangle...
– user559615
Nov 14 at 20:45
1
I don't see how. But here's an observation: The tangent from the $y$-intercept meets the $x$-axis at a point $J$ with abscissa $-c/b$. Then $2|OH|,|OJ|=2(-b/2a)(-c/b)=c/a$. Not sure if this helps.
– Rahul
Nov 16 at 5:16
|
show 5 more comments
1
An obvious interpretation of one of the terms is that $-b/2a$ is the x coordinate of the vertex and thus the location of point H.
– Daniel Gendin
Nov 14 at 20:27
@DanielGendin The more obvious, the better! Thanks!
– user559615
Nov 14 at 20:35
2
I prefer to write the quadratic formula as $x=frac{-b}{2a}pmsqrt{left(frac{-b}{2a}right)^2-frac{c}{a}}$. Thanks to Daniel's comment we already know what $-b/2a$ is. Now there is only $c/a$ left to explain.
– Rahul
Nov 14 at 20:37
@Rahul True. Good observation. But "where" is $a$? Of course, I know that it is the amplitude of the parabola, but I cannot easily show its exact value on this plot. However, $c/a$ suggests me the ratio between two sides of a triangle...
– user559615
Nov 14 at 20:45
1
I don't see how. But here's an observation: The tangent from the $y$-intercept meets the $x$-axis at a point $J$ with abscissa $-c/b$. Then $2|OH|,|OJ|=2(-b/2a)(-c/b)=c/a$. Not sure if this helps.
– Rahul
Nov 16 at 5:16
1
1
An obvious interpretation of one of the terms is that $-b/2a$ is the x coordinate of the vertex and thus the location of point H.
– Daniel Gendin
Nov 14 at 20:27
An obvious interpretation of one of the terms is that $-b/2a$ is the x coordinate of the vertex and thus the location of point H.
– Daniel Gendin
Nov 14 at 20:27
@DanielGendin The more obvious, the better! Thanks!
– user559615
Nov 14 at 20:35
@DanielGendin The more obvious, the better! Thanks!
– user559615
Nov 14 at 20:35
2
2
I prefer to write the quadratic formula as $x=frac{-b}{2a}pmsqrt{left(frac{-b}{2a}right)^2-frac{c}{a}}$. Thanks to Daniel's comment we already know what $-b/2a$ is. Now there is only $c/a$ left to explain.
– Rahul
Nov 14 at 20:37
I prefer to write the quadratic formula as $x=frac{-b}{2a}pmsqrt{left(frac{-b}{2a}right)^2-frac{c}{a}}$. Thanks to Daniel's comment we already know what $-b/2a$ is. Now there is only $c/a$ left to explain.
– Rahul
Nov 14 at 20:37
@Rahul True. Good observation. But "where" is $a$? Of course, I know that it is the amplitude of the parabola, but I cannot easily show its exact value on this plot. However, $c/a$ suggests me the ratio between two sides of a triangle...
– user559615
Nov 14 at 20:45
@Rahul True. Good observation. But "where" is $a$? Of course, I know that it is the amplitude of the parabola, but I cannot easily show its exact value on this plot. However, $c/a$ suggests me the ratio between two sides of a triangle...
– user559615
Nov 14 at 20:45
1
1
I don't see how. But here's an observation: The tangent from the $y$-intercept meets the $x$-axis at a point $J$ with abscissa $-c/b$. Then $2|OH|,|OJ|=2(-b/2a)(-c/b)=c/a$. Not sure if this helps.
– Rahul
Nov 16 at 5:16
I don't see how. But here's an observation: The tangent from the $y$-intercept meets the $x$-axis at a point $J$ with abscissa $-c/b$. Then $2|OH|,|OJ|=2(-b/2a)(-c/b)=c/a$. Not sure if this helps.
– Rahul
Nov 16 at 5:16
|
show 5 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Here's a slight re-packaging of notions from my previous answer.
$$|OQ_{pm}| ;=; |BB_{-}| pm |MQ_{+}| ;=;-frac{b}{2a} pm sqrt{frac{b^2}{4a^2}-frac{c}{a}} ;=; frac{1}{2a} left(;-b pm sqrt{b^2-4ac};right)$$
The figure represents the scenario in which $a>0$, $bleq 0$, $cgeq 0$ (and thus that $|OM|geq |MQ_{pm}|$). Adjustments to accommodate various sign changes should be clear.
Figure labels and calculations incorporate the fact that the latus rectum has length $1/a$.
That $overline{OM} cong overline{BB_{-}}$ is my previous answer's Property 2. That these segments' common signed length is $-b/(2a)$ follows, as before, from the equation of the represented parabola, by calculating the difference in $y$-coordinates for points with $x$-coordinates $pm 1/(4a)$.
The relation between the highlighted areas follows immediately from my previous answer's Property 1. Stripping away the trappings of the specific problem, we can state the area property as a general principle that @Andrea should appreciate:
Property 1a. If squares are erected upon axis-perpendicular semi-chords of a parabola, then the difference in their areas is the area of the rectangle bounded by those chords and the extremities of the parabola's latus rectum.
By the way, here's a proof-without-words for my previous question's Property 2, using Property 1a above.
Wonderful. I'm trying to reproduce this with geogebra. Looks great!
– user559615
Nov 17 at 18:34
This is the closest to a proof without words. Should be put in the textbooks!
– user559615
Nov 17 at 18:36
1
@AndreaPrunotto: Thanks! I'm pretty happy with it. I even learned a couple of new things about parabolas along the way. :)
– Blue
Nov 17 at 18:47
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
This solution isn't nearly as self-evident as I like my illustrations to be, but there are some interesting ideas here.
I'll preface this by noting, in something of an echo of @Rahul's comment, that geometricizing $y=ax^2+bx+c$ is a little tricky, in that $a$, $b$, $c$ are dimensionally distinct. In the approach described below, we take $x$ and $y$ (and thus also the roots of the quadratic equation) to be represented by ($1$-dimensional) lengths; necessarily, we see that $c$ must also be $1$-dimensional, $b$ must be $0$-dimensional (a ratio), and $a$ must be ... $(-1)$-dimensional!
Suppose that the graph of $y=ax^2+bx+c$ represents an upward-facing parabola with vertex $V= (h,-k)$; that is, we take $a$ positive and $b$ non-positive. Let $f$ be the vertex-to-focus distance, $f := |VF|$. Let the parabola cross the $y$-axis at $C$, of distance $cgeq0$ from the origin (although it's less problematic here to allow $c<0$), and let the parabola cross the $x$-axis at $R_{pm}$, at distances $hpm s$ from the origin.
Some auxiliary points: Let the $x$-axis and parabola axis meet at $M$ (the midpoint of $R_{+}$ and $R_{-}$). Let the horizontal line through $V$ meet the $x$-axis at $k$, and let $S$ be the projection of $R_{+}$ onto that line (so $|VK|=h$, $|VS|=s$, and $|OK|=|SR_{+}|=k$). Also, let the lines $x=pm f$ meet the parabola at $B_{pm}$, and let $B$ complete the right triangle with hypotenuse joining those points. Points $A$ and $G$ are on the $y$-axis and parabola axis such that $|KA|=|VG|=4f$.
Given the above, the below happens to be an illustration of the Quadratic Formula:
As I mentioned: not nearly as self-evident as I like. The illustration relies on two interesting properties of parabolas that derive from the reflection property; I'll prove them later.
Property 1. If $P$ is a point on the ("vertical") parabola, then its horizontal displacement from the vertex is the geometric mean of $4f$ and its vertical displacement from the vertex.
The illustration includes two instances of this property in the form of a classical right-triangle construction of the geometric mean.
$$begin{align}
triangle AVC: &quad frac{|KV|}{|KA|} = frac{|KC|}{|KV|} quadtoquad |KV|^2=|KA||KC|quadtoquad h^2=4f(c+k) tag{1} \[6pt]
triangle GSM: &quad frac{|VS|}{|VG|} = frac{|VM|}{|VS|} quadtoquad
|VS|^2=|VG||VM| quadtoquad s^2=4fk tag{2}
end{align}$$
From these, we may conclude $s^2 = h^2 - 4fc$, so that the $x$-coordinates of $R_{pm}$ ---that is, the roots of the quadratic polynomial--- have the form
$$h;pm;sqrt{h^2-4fc} tag{3}$$
(As an aside: Let the circumcircle $bigcirc R_{+} R_{-} C$ meet the $y$-axis again at, say, $D$. Then the power of a point theorems, applied to the origin with respect to this circle, imply $$|OR_{+}||OR_{-}| = (h+s)(h-s) = ccdot 4f = |OC||OD|$$
If we could show independently that $|OD| = 4f$, then we could reason conversely to get $(3)$ without the separate geometric means. I don't see an obvious way to make that association, however ... although little about this approach is obvious.)
Now, $(3)$ bears a bit of a resemblance to the Quadratic Formula. To get it closer, we invoke another property:
Property 2. If $P$, and distinct points $Q_{+}$ and $Q_{-}$, are on a ("vertical") parabola, such that the horizontal displacement from $P$ to each $Q$ is $f$, then the vertical displacement between the $Q$s is the distance from $P$ to the axis of the parabola.
In the figure above, $C$ plays the role of $P$, and $B_pm$ the roles of $Q_{pm}$. Since our parabola represents $y=ax^2+bx+c$, we have that $B_{pm}$ is at (signed) distance $af^2pm bf+c$ from the $x$-axis; thus, the vertical displacement between them is simply the difference of these expressions. By Property 2, we can write
$$h = left(;af^2-bf+c;right) - left(;af^2+bf+c;right) = -2bf tag{4}$$
(Recall that $b$ is non-negative here.) Therefore, $(3)$ becomes
$$-2bf;pm;sqrt{4b^2f^2-4cf} tag{5}$$
which we can write as
$$2fleft(;-b pm sqrt{b^2-frac{c}{f}};right) tag{6}$$
In light of the "known" observation that $a = dfrac{1}{4f}$ (there's that $(-1)$-dimensionality we needed!), we see
$$frac{1}{2a}left(;-bpmsqrt{b^2-4ac};right) tag{7}$$
so that we do, in fact, have the Quadratic Formula. $square$
I'm a little disappointed in the algebraic manipulations required in this demonstration. Perhaps a second pass at the argument, drawing from some more sophisticated geometric properties of parabolas, will streamline things.
Here are proofs of the Properties ...
Property 1.
Here, $overline{DW}$ is the directrix of the parabola, so that $triangle PFD$ is isosceles. The reflection property of parabolas implies that the tangent at $P$ bisects the angle at $P$; it therefore also bisects base $overline{FD}$ at a point $M$ that, by a simple similarity argument, also serves as the midpoint of $overline{BV}$. From similar subtriangles within $triangle PMD$, we have
$$frac{|BM|}{|BD|}=frac{|BP|}{|BM|} quadtoquad left(frac12 qright)^2=fp quadtoquad q^2 = 4fcdot p$$
giving the result. $square$
Property 2.
Again, $overline{DW}$ is the directrix. This time, we use the reflection property relative to $P$ to conclude that the tangent at $P$ is perpendicular to $overline{FD}$. It is "known" that chord $overline{Q_{+}Q_{-}}$ is parallel to that tangent. With a little angle chasing, we find that we may conclude $triangle Q_{+}QQ_{-}cong triangle FWD$, and the property follows. $square$
What an amazing work, @Blue. I am reading it. Thanks for this effort, I am also trying something, but now I am afraid that I would not be able produce anything simpler!
– user559615
Nov 15 at 16:34
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
As the Wikipedia article Power of a point indicates, the tangent to the circle from the origin distance squared is the product of the two roots, but this is just $,c/a.$
Thanks for your answer. I did not know this, and I am reading about!
– user559615
Nov 14 at 22:10
... But I can I visualize this onto the above construction, in the context of the Quadratic Formula, I mean?
– user559615
Nov 14 at 22:12
I'm working on it.
– Somos
Nov 14 at 22:20
Thanks! I also tried to go further.
– user559615
Nov 15 at 6:07
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The coefficients $a,b,c$ of the quadratic equation $ax^2+bx^2+c=0$ are not very geometric, so let's work with some slightly different variables that do have a geometric meaning:
begin{align}
alpha &= -frac b{2a}, & beta &= -frac cb, & gamma &= c.
end{align}
In reverse order, $C=(0,gamma)$ is the $y$-intercept of the parabola, $B=(beta,0)$ is the point where the tangent through $C$ meets the $x$-axis, and $A=(alpha,0)$ is the point on the $x$-axis with the same $x$-coordinate as the parabola's focus. The parabola is specified via $alpha,beta,gamma$, and we need to find the points $P$ and $Q$ where it crosses the $x$-axis.
Blue: given data, gray: constructed, green: equal quantities, red: desired roots
Denote the focus by $F$ and the intersection of the directrix and the $y$-axis by $D$.
Construct the line $CF$ using the property of the parabola that the tangent $CB$ bisects $angle OCF$. Obtain $F$ as the intersection of $CF$ and the vertical through $A$.
Obtain $D$ using the fact that $C$ is equidistant from $F$ and $D$. The directrix is the horizontal through $D$, and is at distance $|OD|$ from the $x$-axis.
Obtain $P$ and $Q$ as the points on the $x$-axis at distance $|OD|$ from $F$.
$P$ and $Q$ are equidistant from $F$ and the directrix, and so lie on the parabola.
To derive the quadratic formula from this, we take an additional step, which may or may not be acceptable from a pure Euclidean-geometry perspective: We note that moving $C$ along the $y$-axis doesn't change the location of the roots, since it just scales the parabola vertically about the $x$-axis. Therefore, we may choose $C$ freely to simplify the construction.
In particular, let us take $C=(0,beta)$. Then $angle OCB=45^circ$, so the line $CF$ is horizontal, and $F=(alpha,beta)$. Now $|CD|=|CF|=alpha$, so $|OD|=alpha-beta$. The right triangle $triangle AFP$ has hypotenuse $|FP|=|OD|=alpha-beta$ and vertical side $|AF|=beta$, so the horizontal side is $|AP|=sqrt{(alpha-beta)^2-beta^2}=sqrt{alpha^2-2alphabeta}$; the same is true for $|AQ|$. Therefore,
begin{align}
{|OP|,|OQ|} &= |OA| pm |AP| \
&= alpha pm sqrt{alpha^2-2alphabeta}.
end{align}
Plug in the values of $alpha$ and $beta$ from above, and you obtain the quadratic formula.
Great!!!! Thanks a lot. I am studying it.
– user559615
Nov 17 at 12:55
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Here's a slight re-packaging of notions from my previous answer.
$$|OQ_{pm}| ;=; |BB_{-}| pm |MQ_{+}| ;=;-frac{b}{2a} pm sqrt{frac{b^2}{4a^2}-frac{c}{a}} ;=; frac{1}{2a} left(;-b pm sqrt{b^2-4ac};right)$$
The figure represents the scenario in which $a>0$, $bleq 0$, $cgeq 0$ (and thus that $|OM|geq |MQ_{pm}|$). Adjustments to accommodate various sign changes should be clear.
Figure labels and calculations incorporate the fact that the latus rectum has length $1/a$.
That $overline{OM} cong overline{BB_{-}}$ is my previous answer's Property 2. That these segments' common signed length is $-b/(2a)$ follows, as before, from the equation of the represented parabola, by calculating the difference in $y$-coordinates for points with $x$-coordinates $pm 1/(4a)$.
The relation between the highlighted areas follows immediately from my previous answer's Property 1. Stripping away the trappings of the specific problem, we can state the area property as a general principle that @Andrea should appreciate:
Property 1a. If squares are erected upon axis-perpendicular semi-chords of a parabola, then the difference in their areas is the area of the rectangle bounded by those chords and the extremities of the parabola's latus rectum.
By the way, here's a proof-without-words for my previous question's Property 2, using Property 1a above.
Wonderful. I'm trying to reproduce this with geogebra. Looks great!
– user559615
Nov 17 at 18:34
This is the closest to a proof without words. Should be put in the textbooks!
– user559615
Nov 17 at 18:36
1
@AndreaPrunotto: Thanks! I'm pretty happy with it. I even learned a couple of new things about parabolas along the way. :)
– Blue
Nov 17 at 18:47
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Here's a slight re-packaging of notions from my previous answer.
$$|OQ_{pm}| ;=; |BB_{-}| pm |MQ_{+}| ;=;-frac{b}{2a} pm sqrt{frac{b^2}{4a^2}-frac{c}{a}} ;=; frac{1}{2a} left(;-b pm sqrt{b^2-4ac};right)$$
The figure represents the scenario in which $a>0$, $bleq 0$, $cgeq 0$ (and thus that $|OM|geq |MQ_{pm}|$). Adjustments to accommodate various sign changes should be clear.
Figure labels and calculations incorporate the fact that the latus rectum has length $1/a$.
That $overline{OM} cong overline{BB_{-}}$ is my previous answer's Property 2. That these segments' common signed length is $-b/(2a)$ follows, as before, from the equation of the represented parabola, by calculating the difference in $y$-coordinates for points with $x$-coordinates $pm 1/(4a)$.
The relation between the highlighted areas follows immediately from my previous answer's Property 1. Stripping away the trappings of the specific problem, we can state the area property as a general principle that @Andrea should appreciate:
Property 1a. If squares are erected upon axis-perpendicular semi-chords of a parabola, then the difference in their areas is the area of the rectangle bounded by those chords and the extremities of the parabola's latus rectum.
By the way, here's a proof-without-words for my previous question's Property 2, using Property 1a above.
Wonderful. I'm trying to reproduce this with geogebra. Looks great!
– user559615
Nov 17 at 18:34
This is the closest to a proof without words. Should be put in the textbooks!
– user559615
Nov 17 at 18:36
1
@AndreaPrunotto: Thanks! I'm pretty happy with it. I even learned a couple of new things about parabolas along the way. :)
– Blue
Nov 17 at 18:47
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Here's a slight re-packaging of notions from my previous answer.
$$|OQ_{pm}| ;=; |BB_{-}| pm |MQ_{+}| ;=;-frac{b}{2a} pm sqrt{frac{b^2}{4a^2}-frac{c}{a}} ;=; frac{1}{2a} left(;-b pm sqrt{b^2-4ac};right)$$
The figure represents the scenario in which $a>0$, $bleq 0$, $cgeq 0$ (and thus that $|OM|geq |MQ_{pm}|$). Adjustments to accommodate various sign changes should be clear.
Figure labels and calculations incorporate the fact that the latus rectum has length $1/a$.
That $overline{OM} cong overline{BB_{-}}$ is my previous answer's Property 2. That these segments' common signed length is $-b/(2a)$ follows, as before, from the equation of the represented parabola, by calculating the difference in $y$-coordinates for points with $x$-coordinates $pm 1/(4a)$.
The relation between the highlighted areas follows immediately from my previous answer's Property 1. Stripping away the trappings of the specific problem, we can state the area property as a general principle that @Andrea should appreciate:
Property 1a. If squares are erected upon axis-perpendicular semi-chords of a parabola, then the difference in their areas is the area of the rectangle bounded by those chords and the extremities of the parabola's latus rectum.
By the way, here's a proof-without-words for my previous question's Property 2, using Property 1a above.
Here's a slight re-packaging of notions from my previous answer.
$$|OQ_{pm}| ;=; |BB_{-}| pm |MQ_{+}| ;=;-frac{b}{2a} pm sqrt{frac{b^2}{4a^2}-frac{c}{a}} ;=; frac{1}{2a} left(;-b pm sqrt{b^2-4ac};right)$$
The figure represents the scenario in which $a>0$, $bleq 0$, $cgeq 0$ (and thus that $|OM|geq |MQ_{pm}|$). Adjustments to accommodate various sign changes should be clear.
Figure labels and calculations incorporate the fact that the latus rectum has length $1/a$.
That $overline{OM} cong overline{BB_{-}}$ is my previous answer's Property 2. That these segments' common signed length is $-b/(2a)$ follows, as before, from the equation of the represented parabola, by calculating the difference in $y$-coordinates for points with $x$-coordinates $pm 1/(4a)$.
The relation between the highlighted areas follows immediately from my previous answer's Property 1. Stripping away the trappings of the specific problem, we can state the area property as a general principle that @Andrea should appreciate:
Property 1a. If squares are erected upon axis-perpendicular semi-chords of a parabola, then the difference in their areas is the area of the rectangle bounded by those chords and the extremities of the parabola's latus rectum.
By the way, here's a proof-without-words for my previous question's Property 2, using Property 1a above.
edited Nov 20 at 13:41
answered Nov 17 at 16:36
Blue
47.2k870148
47.2k870148
Wonderful. I'm trying to reproduce this with geogebra. Looks great!
– user559615
Nov 17 at 18:34
This is the closest to a proof without words. Should be put in the textbooks!
– user559615
Nov 17 at 18:36
1
@AndreaPrunotto: Thanks! I'm pretty happy with it. I even learned a couple of new things about parabolas along the way. :)
– Blue
Nov 17 at 18:47
add a comment |
Wonderful. I'm trying to reproduce this with geogebra. Looks great!
– user559615
Nov 17 at 18:34
This is the closest to a proof without words. Should be put in the textbooks!
– user559615
Nov 17 at 18:36
1
@AndreaPrunotto: Thanks! I'm pretty happy with it. I even learned a couple of new things about parabolas along the way. :)
– Blue
Nov 17 at 18:47
Wonderful. I'm trying to reproduce this with geogebra. Looks great!
– user559615
Nov 17 at 18:34
Wonderful. I'm trying to reproduce this with geogebra. Looks great!
– user559615
Nov 17 at 18:34
This is the closest to a proof without words. Should be put in the textbooks!
– user559615
Nov 17 at 18:36
This is the closest to a proof without words. Should be put in the textbooks!
– user559615
Nov 17 at 18:36
1
1
@AndreaPrunotto: Thanks! I'm pretty happy with it. I even learned a couple of new things about parabolas along the way. :)
– Blue
Nov 17 at 18:47
@AndreaPrunotto: Thanks! I'm pretty happy with it. I even learned a couple of new things about parabolas along the way. :)
– Blue
Nov 17 at 18:47
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
This solution isn't nearly as self-evident as I like my illustrations to be, but there are some interesting ideas here.
I'll preface this by noting, in something of an echo of @Rahul's comment, that geometricizing $y=ax^2+bx+c$ is a little tricky, in that $a$, $b$, $c$ are dimensionally distinct. In the approach described below, we take $x$ and $y$ (and thus also the roots of the quadratic equation) to be represented by ($1$-dimensional) lengths; necessarily, we see that $c$ must also be $1$-dimensional, $b$ must be $0$-dimensional (a ratio), and $a$ must be ... $(-1)$-dimensional!
Suppose that the graph of $y=ax^2+bx+c$ represents an upward-facing parabola with vertex $V= (h,-k)$; that is, we take $a$ positive and $b$ non-positive. Let $f$ be the vertex-to-focus distance, $f := |VF|$. Let the parabola cross the $y$-axis at $C$, of distance $cgeq0$ from the origin (although it's less problematic here to allow $c<0$), and let the parabola cross the $x$-axis at $R_{pm}$, at distances $hpm s$ from the origin.
Some auxiliary points: Let the $x$-axis and parabola axis meet at $M$ (the midpoint of $R_{+}$ and $R_{-}$). Let the horizontal line through $V$ meet the $x$-axis at $k$, and let $S$ be the projection of $R_{+}$ onto that line (so $|VK|=h$, $|VS|=s$, and $|OK|=|SR_{+}|=k$). Also, let the lines $x=pm f$ meet the parabola at $B_{pm}$, and let $B$ complete the right triangle with hypotenuse joining those points. Points $A$ and $G$ are on the $y$-axis and parabola axis such that $|KA|=|VG|=4f$.
Given the above, the below happens to be an illustration of the Quadratic Formula:
As I mentioned: not nearly as self-evident as I like. The illustration relies on two interesting properties of parabolas that derive from the reflection property; I'll prove them later.
Property 1. If $P$ is a point on the ("vertical") parabola, then its horizontal displacement from the vertex is the geometric mean of $4f$ and its vertical displacement from the vertex.
The illustration includes two instances of this property in the form of a classical right-triangle construction of the geometric mean.
$$begin{align}
triangle AVC: &quad frac{|KV|}{|KA|} = frac{|KC|}{|KV|} quadtoquad |KV|^2=|KA||KC|quadtoquad h^2=4f(c+k) tag{1} \[6pt]
triangle GSM: &quad frac{|VS|}{|VG|} = frac{|VM|}{|VS|} quadtoquad
|VS|^2=|VG||VM| quadtoquad s^2=4fk tag{2}
end{align}$$
From these, we may conclude $s^2 = h^2 - 4fc$, so that the $x$-coordinates of $R_{pm}$ ---that is, the roots of the quadratic polynomial--- have the form
$$h;pm;sqrt{h^2-4fc} tag{3}$$
(As an aside: Let the circumcircle $bigcirc R_{+} R_{-} C$ meet the $y$-axis again at, say, $D$. Then the power of a point theorems, applied to the origin with respect to this circle, imply $$|OR_{+}||OR_{-}| = (h+s)(h-s) = ccdot 4f = |OC||OD|$$
If we could show independently that $|OD| = 4f$, then we could reason conversely to get $(3)$ without the separate geometric means. I don't see an obvious way to make that association, however ... although little about this approach is obvious.)
Now, $(3)$ bears a bit of a resemblance to the Quadratic Formula. To get it closer, we invoke another property:
Property 2. If $P$, and distinct points $Q_{+}$ and $Q_{-}$, are on a ("vertical") parabola, such that the horizontal displacement from $P$ to each $Q$ is $f$, then the vertical displacement between the $Q$s is the distance from $P$ to the axis of the parabola.
In the figure above, $C$ plays the role of $P$, and $B_pm$ the roles of $Q_{pm}$. Since our parabola represents $y=ax^2+bx+c$, we have that $B_{pm}$ is at (signed) distance $af^2pm bf+c$ from the $x$-axis; thus, the vertical displacement between them is simply the difference of these expressions. By Property 2, we can write
$$h = left(;af^2-bf+c;right) - left(;af^2+bf+c;right) = -2bf tag{4}$$
(Recall that $b$ is non-negative here.) Therefore, $(3)$ becomes
$$-2bf;pm;sqrt{4b^2f^2-4cf} tag{5}$$
which we can write as
$$2fleft(;-b pm sqrt{b^2-frac{c}{f}};right) tag{6}$$
In light of the "known" observation that $a = dfrac{1}{4f}$ (there's that $(-1)$-dimensionality we needed!), we see
$$frac{1}{2a}left(;-bpmsqrt{b^2-4ac};right) tag{7}$$
so that we do, in fact, have the Quadratic Formula. $square$
I'm a little disappointed in the algebraic manipulations required in this demonstration. Perhaps a second pass at the argument, drawing from some more sophisticated geometric properties of parabolas, will streamline things.
Here are proofs of the Properties ...
Property 1.
Here, $overline{DW}$ is the directrix of the parabola, so that $triangle PFD$ is isosceles. The reflection property of parabolas implies that the tangent at $P$ bisects the angle at $P$; it therefore also bisects base $overline{FD}$ at a point $M$ that, by a simple similarity argument, also serves as the midpoint of $overline{BV}$. From similar subtriangles within $triangle PMD$, we have
$$frac{|BM|}{|BD|}=frac{|BP|}{|BM|} quadtoquad left(frac12 qright)^2=fp quadtoquad q^2 = 4fcdot p$$
giving the result. $square$
Property 2.
Again, $overline{DW}$ is the directrix. This time, we use the reflection property relative to $P$ to conclude that the tangent at $P$ is perpendicular to $overline{FD}$. It is "known" that chord $overline{Q_{+}Q_{-}}$ is parallel to that tangent. With a little angle chasing, we find that we may conclude $triangle Q_{+}QQ_{-}cong triangle FWD$, and the property follows. $square$
What an amazing work, @Blue. I am reading it. Thanks for this effort, I am also trying something, but now I am afraid that I would not be able produce anything simpler!
– user559615
Nov 15 at 16:34
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
This solution isn't nearly as self-evident as I like my illustrations to be, but there are some interesting ideas here.
I'll preface this by noting, in something of an echo of @Rahul's comment, that geometricizing $y=ax^2+bx+c$ is a little tricky, in that $a$, $b$, $c$ are dimensionally distinct. In the approach described below, we take $x$ and $y$ (and thus also the roots of the quadratic equation) to be represented by ($1$-dimensional) lengths; necessarily, we see that $c$ must also be $1$-dimensional, $b$ must be $0$-dimensional (a ratio), and $a$ must be ... $(-1)$-dimensional!
Suppose that the graph of $y=ax^2+bx+c$ represents an upward-facing parabola with vertex $V= (h,-k)$; that is, we take $a$ positive and $b$ non-positive. Let $f$ be the vertex-to-focus distance, $f := |VF|$. Let the parabola cross the $y$-axis at $C$, of distance $cgeq0$ from the origin (although it's less problematic here to allow $c<0$), and let the parabola cross the $x$-axis at $R_{pm}$, at distances $hpm s$ from the origin.
Some auxiliary points: Let the $x$-axis and parabola axis meet at $M$ (the midpoint of $R_{+}$ and $R_{-}$). Let the horizontal line through $V$ meet the $x$-axis at $k$, and let $S$ be the projection of $R_{+}$ onto that line (so $|VK|=h$, $|VS|=s$, and $|OK|=|SR_{+}|=k$). Also, let the lines $x=pm f$ meet the parabola at $B_{pm}$, and let $B$ complete the right triangle with hypotenuse joining those points. Points $A$ and $G$ are on the $y$-axis and parabola axis such that $|KA|=|VG|=4f$.
Given the above, the below happens to be an illustration of the Quadratic Formula:
As I mentioned: not nearly as self-evident as I like. The illustration relies on two interesting properties of parabolas that derive from the reflection property; I'll prove them later.
Property 1. If $P$ is a point on the ("vertical") parabola, then its horizontal displacement from the vertex is the geometric mean of $4f$ and its vertical displacement from the vertex.
The illustration includes two instances of this property in the form of a classical right-triangle construction of the geometric mean.
$$begin{align}
triangle AVC: &quad frac{|KV|}{|KA|} = frac{|KC|}{|KV|} quadtoquad |KV|^2=|KA||KC|quadtoquad h^2=4f(c+k) tag{1} \[6pt]
triangle GSM: &quad frac{|VS|}{|VG|} = frac{|VM|}{|VS|} quadtoquad
|VS|^2=|VG||VM| quadtoquad s^2=4fk tag{2}
end{align}$$
From these, we may conclude $s^2 = h^2 - 4fc$, so that the $x$-coordinates of $R_{pm}$ ---that is, the roots of the quadratic polynomial--- have the form
$$h;pm;sqrt{h^2-4fc} tag{3}$$
(As an aside: Let the circumcircle $bigcirc R_{+} R_{-} C$ meet the $y$-axis again at, say, $D$. Then the power of a point theorems, applied to the origin with respect to this circle, imply $$|OR_{+}||OR_{-}| = (h+s)(h-s) = ccdot 4f = |OC||OD|$$
If we could show independently that $|OD| = 4f$, then we could reason conversely to get $(3)$ without the separate geometric means. I don't see an obvious way to make that association, however ... although little about this approach is obvious.)
Now, $(3)$ bears a bit of a resemblance to the Quadratic Formula. To get it closer, we invoke another property:
Property 2. If $P$, and distinct points $Q_{+}$ and $Q_{-}$, are on a ("vertical") parabola, such that the horizontal displacement from $P$ to each $Q$ is $f$, then the vertical displacement between the $Q$s is the distance from $P$ to the axis of the parabola.
In the figure above, $C$ plays the role of $P$, and $B_pm$ the roles of $Q_{pm}$. Since our parabola represents $y=ax^2+bx+c$, we have that $B_{pm}$ is at (signed) distance $af^2pm bf+c$ from the $x$-axis; thus, the vertical displacement between them is simply the difference of these expressions. By Property 2, we can write
$$h = left(;af^2-bf+c;right) - left(;af^2+bf+c;right) = -2bf tag{4}$$
(Recall that $b$ is non-negative here.) Therefore, $(3)$ becomes
$$-2bf;pm;sqrt{4b^2f^2-4cf} tag{5}$$
which we can write as
$$2fleft(;-b pm sqrt{b^2-frac{c}{f}};right) tag{6}$$
In light of the "known" observation that $a = dfrac{1}{4f}$ (there's that $(-1)$-dimensionality we needed!), we see
$$frac{1}{2a}left(;-bpmsqrt{b^2-4ac};right) tag{7}$$
so that we do, in fact, have the Quadratic Formula. $square$
I'm a little disappointed in the algebraic manipulations required in this demonstration. Perhaps a second pass at the argument, drawing from some more sophisticated geometric properties of parabolas, will streamline things.
Here are proofs of the Properties ...
Property 1.
Here, $overline{DW}$ is the directrix of the parabola, so that $triangle PFD$ is isosceles. The reflection property of parabolas implies that the tangent at $P$ bisects the angle at $P$; it therefore also bisects base $overline{FD}$ at a point $M$ that, by a simple similarity argument, also serves as the midpoint of $overline{BV}$. From similar subtriangles within $triangle PMD$, we have
$$frac{|BM|}{|BD|}=frac{|BP|}{|BM|} quadtoquad left(frac12 qright)^2=fp quadtoquad q^2 = 4fcdot p$$
giving the result. $square$
Property 2.
Again, $overline{DW}$ is the directrix. This time, we use the reflection property relative to $P$ to conclude that the tangent at $P$ is perpendicular to $overline{FD}$. It is "known" that chord $overline{Q_{+}Q_{-}}$ is parallel to that tangent. With a little angle chasing, we find that we may conclude $triangle Q_{+}QQ_{-}cong triangle FWD$, and the property follows. $square$
What an amazing work, @Blue. I am reading it. Thanks for this effort, I am also trying something, but now I am afraid that I would not be able produce anything simpler!
– user559615
Nov 15 at 16:34
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
This solution isn't nearly as self-evident as I like my illustrations to be, but there are some interesting ideas here.
I'll preface this by noting, in something of an echo of @Rahul's comment, that geometricizing $y=ax^2+bx+c$ is a little tricky, in that $a$, $b$, $c$ are dimensionally distinct. In the approach described below, we take $x$ and $y$ (and thus also the roots of the quadratic equation) to be represented by ($1$-dimensional) lengths; necessarily, we see that $c$ must also be $1$-dimensional, $b$ must be $0$-dimensional (a ratio), and $a$ must be ... $(-1)$-dimensional!
Suppose that the graph of $y=ax^2+bx+c$ represents an upward-facing parabola with vertex $V= (h,-k)$; that is, we take $a$ positive and $b$ non-positive. Let $f$ be the vertex-to-focus distance, $f := |VF|$. Let the parabola cross the $y$-axis at $C$, of distance $cgeq0$ from the origin (although it's less problematic here to allow $c<0$), and let the parabola cross the $x$-axis at $R_{pm}$, at distances $hpm s$ from the origin.
Some auxiliary points: Let the $x$-axis and parabola axis meet at $M$ (the midpoint of $R_{+}$ and $R_{-}$). Let the horizontal line through $V$ meet the $x$-axis at $k$, and let $S$ be the projection of $R_{+}$ onto that line (so $|VK|=h$, $|VS|=s$, and $|OK|=|SR_{+}|=k$). Also, let the lines $x=pm f$ meet the parabola at $B_{pm}$, and let $B$ complete the right triangle with hypotenuse joining those points. Points $A$ and $G$ are on the $y$-axis and parabola axis such that $|KA|=|VG|=4f$.
Given the above, the below happens to be an illustration of the Quadratic Formula:
As I mentioned: not nearly as self-evident as I like. The illustration relies on two interesting properties of parabolas that derive from the reflection property; I'll prove them later.
Property 1. If $P$ is a point on the ("vertical") parabola, then its horizontal displacement from the vertex is the geometric mean of $4f$ and its vertical displacement from the vertex.
The illustration includes two instances of this property in the form of a classical right-triangle construction of the geometric mean.
$$begin{align}
triangle AVC: &quad frac{|KV|}{|KA|} = frac{|KC|}{|KV|} quadtoquad |KV|^2=|KA||KC|quadtoquad h^2=4f(c+k) tag{1} \[6pt]
triangle GSM: &quad frac{|VS|}{|VG|} = frac{|VM|}{|VS|} quadtoquad
|VS|^2=|VG||VM| quadtoquad s^2=4fk tag{2}
end{align}$$
From these, we may conclude $s^2 = h^2 - 4fc$, so that the $x$-coordinates of $R_{pm}$ ---that is, the roots of the quadratic polynomial--- have the form
$$h;pm;sqrt{h^2-4fc} tag{3}$$
(As an aside: Let the circumcircle $bigcirc R_{+} R_{-} C$ meet the $y$-axis again at, say, $D$. Then the power of a point theorems, applied to the origin with respect to this circle, imply $$|OR_{+}||OR_{-}| = (h+s)(h-s) = ccdot 4f = |OC||OD|$$
If we could show independently that $|OD| = 4f$, then we could reason conversely to get $(3)$ without the separate geometric means. I don't see an obvious way to make that association, however ... although little about this approach is obvious.)
Now, $(3)$ bears a bit of a resemblance to the Quadratic Formula. To get it closer, we invoke another property:
Property 2. If $P$, and distinct points $Q_{+}$ and $Q_{-}$, are on a ("vertical") parabola, such that the horizontal displacement from $P$ to each $Q$ is $f$, then the vertical displacement between the $Q$s is the distance from $P$ to the axis of the parabola.
In the figure above, $C$ plays the role of $P$, and $B_pm$ the roles of $Q_{pm}$. Since our parabola represents $y=ax^2+bx+c$, we have that $B_{pm}$ is at (signed) distance $af^2pm bf+c$ from the $x$-axis; thus, the vertical displacement between them is simply the difference of these expressions. By Property 2, we can write
$$h = left(;af^2-bf+c;right) - left(;af^2+bf+c;right) = -2bf tag{4}$$
(Recall that $b$ is non-negative here.) Therefore, $(3)$ becomes
$$-2bf;pm;sqrt{4b^2f^2-4cf} tag{5}$$
which we can write as
$$2fleft(;-b pm sqrt{b^2-frac{c}{f}};right) tag{6}$$
In light of the "known" observation that $a = dfrac{1}{4f}$ (there's that $(-1)$-dimensionality we needed!), we see
$$frac{1}{2a}left(;-bpmsqrt{b^2-4ac};right) tag{7}$$
so that we do, in fact, have the Quadratic Formula. $square$
I'm a little disappointed in the algebraic manipulations required in this demonstration. Perhaps a second pass at the argument, drawing from some more sophisticated geometric properties of parabolas, will streamline things.
Here are proofs of the Properties ...
Property 1.
Here, $overline{DW}$ is the directrix of the parabola, so that $triangle PFD$ is isosceles. The reflection property of parabolas implies that the tangent at $P$ bisects the angle at $P$; it therefore also bisects base $overline{FD}$ at a point $M$ that, by a simple similarity argument, also serves as the midpoint of $overline{BV}$. From similar subtriangles within $triangle PMD$, we have
$$frac{|BM|}{|BD|}=frac{|BP|}{|BM|} quadtoquad left(frac12 qright)^2=fp quadtoquad q^2 = 4fcdot p$$
giving the result. $square$
Property 2.
Again, $overline{DW}$ is the directrix. This time, we use the reflection property relative to $P$ to conclude that the tangent at $P$ is perpendicular to $overline{FD}$. It is "known" that chord $overline{Q_{+}Q_{-}}$ is parallel to that tangent. With a little angle chasing, we find that we may conclude $triangle Q_{+}QQ_{-}cong triangle FWD$, and the property follows. $square$
This solution isn't nearly as self-evident as I like my illustrations to be, but there are some interesting ideas here.
I'll preface this by noting, in something of an echo of @Rahul's comment, that geometricizing $y=ax^2+bx+c$ is a little tricky, in that $a$, $b$, $c$ are dimensionally distinct. In the approach described below, we take $x$ and $y$ (and thus also the roots of the quadratic equation) to be represented by ($1$-dimensional) lengths; necessarily, we see that $c$ must also be $1$-dimensional, $b$ must be $0$-dimensional (a ratio), and $a$ must be ... $(-1)$-dimensional!
Suppose that the graph of $y=ax^2+bx+c$ represents an upward-facing parabola with vertex $V= (h,-k)$; that is, we take $a$ positive and $b$ non-positive. Let $f$ be the vertex-to-focus distance, $f := |VF|$. Let the parabola cross the $y$-axis at $C$, of distance $cgeq0$ from the origin (although it's less problematic here to allow $c<0$), and let the parabola cross the $x$-axis at $R_{pm}$, at distances $hpm s$ from the origin.
Some auxiliary points: Let the $x$-axis and parabola axis meet at $M$ (the midpoint of $R_{+}$ and $R_{-}$). Let the horizontal line through $V$ meet the $x$-axis at $k$, and let $S$ be the projection of $R_{+}$ onto that line (so $|VK|=h$, $|VS|=s$, and $|OK|=|SR_{+}|=k$). Also, let the lines $x=pm f$ meet the parabola at $B_{pm}$, and let $B$ complete the right triangle with hypotenuse joining those points. Points $A$ and $G$ are on the $y$-axis and parabola axis such that $|KA|=|VG|=4f$.
Given the above, the below happens to be an illustration of the Quadratic Formula:
As I mentioned: not nearly as self-evident as I like. The illustration relies on two interesting properties of parabolas that derive from the reflection property; I'll prove them later.
Property 1. If $P$ is a point on the ("vertical") parabola, then its horizontal displacement from the vertex is the geometric mean of $4f$ and its vertical displacement from the vertex.
The illustration includes two instances of this property in the form of a classical right-triangle construction of the geometric mean.
$$begin{align}
triangle AVC: &quad frac{|KV|}{|KA|} = frac{|KC|}{|KV|} quadtoquad |KV|^2=|KA||KC|quadtoquad h^2=4f(c+k) tag{1} \[6pt]
triangle GSM: &quad frac{|VS|}{|VG|} = frac{|VM|}{|VS|} quadtoquad
|VS|^2=|VG||VM| quadtoquad s^2=4fk tag{2}
end{align}$$
From these, we may conclude $s^2 = h^2 - 4fc$, so that the $x$-coordinates of $R_{pm}$ ---that is, the roots of the quadratic polynomial--- have the form
$$h;pm;sqrt{h^2-4fc} tag{3}$$
(As an aside: Let the circumcircle $bigcirc R_{+} R_{-} C$ meet the $y$-axis again at, say, $D$. Then the power of a point theorems, applied to the origin with respect to this circle, imply $$|OR_{+}||OR_{-}| = (h+s)(h-s) = ccdot 4f = |OC||OD|$$
If we could show independently that $|OD| = 4f$, then we could reason conversely to get $(3)$ without the separate geometric means. I don't see an obvious way to make that association, however ... although little about this approach is obvious.)
Now, $(3)$ bears a bit of a resemblance to the Quadratic Formula. To get it closer, we invoke another property:
Property 2. If $P$, and distinct points $Q_{+}$ and $Q_{-}$, are on a ("vertical") parabola, such that the horizontal displacement from $P$ to each $Q$ is $f$, then the vertical displacement between the $Q$s is the distance from $P$ to the axis of the parabola.
In the figure above, $C$ plays the role of $P$, and $B_pm$ the roles of $Q_{pm}$. Since our parabola represents $y=ax^2+bx+c$, we have that $B_{pm}$ is at (signed) distance $af^2pm bf+c$ from the $x$-axis; thus, the vertical displacement between them is simply the difference of these expressions. By Property 2, we can write
$$h = left(;af^2-bf+c;right) - left(;af^2+bf+c;right) = -2bf tag{4}$$
(Recall that $b$ is non-negative here.) Therefore, $(3)$ becomes
$$-2bf;pm;sqrt{4b^2f^2-4cf} tag{5}$$
which we can write as
$$2fleft(;-b pm sqrt{b^2-frac{c}{f}};right) tag{6}$$
In light of the "known" observation that $a = dfrac{1}{4f}$ (there's that $(-1)$-dimensionality we needed!), we see
$$frac{1}{2a}left(;-bpmsqrt{b^2-4ac};right) tag{7}$$
so that we do, in fact, have the Quadratic Formula. $square$
I'm a little disappointed in the algebraic manipulations required in this demonstration. Perhaps a second pass at the argument, drawing from some more sophisticated geometric properties of parabolas, will streamline things.
Here are proofs of the Properties ...
Property 1.
Here, $overline{DW}$ is the directrix of the parabola, so that $triangle PFD$ is isosceles. The reflection property of parabolas implies that the tangent at $P$ bisects the angle at $P$; it therefore also bisects base $overline{FD}$ at a point $M$ that, by a simple similarity argument, also serves as the midpoint of $overline{BV}$. From similar subtriangles within $triangle PMD$, we have
$$frac{|BM|}{|BD|}=frac{|BP|}{|BM|} quadtoquad left(frac12 qright)^2=fp quadtoquad q^2 = 4fcdot p$$
giving the result. $square$
Property 2.
Again, $overline{DW}$ is the directrix. This time, we use the reflection property relative to $P$ to conclude that the tangent at $P$ is perpendicular to $overline{FD}$. It is "known" that chord $overline{Q_{+}Q_{-}}$ is parallel to that tangent. With a little angle chasing, we find that we may conclude $triangle Q_{+}QQ_{-}cong triangle FWD$, and the property follows. $square$
answered Nov 15 at 16:27
Blue
47.2k870148
47.2k870148
What an amazing work, @Blue. I am reading it. Thanks for this effort, I am also trying something, but now I am afraid that I would not be able produce anything simpler!
– user559615
Nov 15 at 16:34
add a comment |
What an amazing work, @Blue. I am reading it. Thanks for this effort, I am also trying something, but now I am afraid that I would not be able produce anything simpler!
– user559615
Nov 15 at 16:34
What an amazing work, @Blue. I am reading it. Thanks for this effort, I am also trying something, but now I am afraid that I would not be able produce anything simpler!
– user559615
Nov 15 at 16:34
What an amazing work, @Blue. I am reading it. Thanks for this effort, I am also trying something, but now I am afraid that I would not be able produce anything simpler!
– user559615
Nov 15 at 16:34
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
As the Wikipedia article Power of a point indicates, the tangent to the circle from the origin distance squared is the product of the two roots, but this is just $,c/a.$
Thanks for your answer. I did not know this, and I am reading about!
– user559615
Nov 14 at 22:10
... But I can I visualize this onto the above construction, in the context of the Quadratic Formula, I mean?
– user559615
Nov 14 at 22:12
I'm working on it.
– Somos
Nov 14 at 22:20
Thanks! I also tried to go further.
– user559615
Nov 15 at 6:07
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
As the Wikipedia article Power of a point indicates, the tangent to the circle from the origin distance squared is the product of the two roots, but this is just $,c/a.$
Thanks for your answer. I did not know this, and I am reading about!
– user559615
Nov 14 at 22:10
... But I can I visualize this onto the above construction, in the context of the Quadratic Formula, I mean?
– user559615
Nov 14 at 22:12
I'm working on it.
– Somos
Nov 14 at 22:20
Thanks! I also tried to go further.
– user559615
Nov 15 at 6:07
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
As the Wikipedia article Power of a point indicates, the tangent to the circle from the origin distance squared is the product of the two roots, but this is just $,c/a.$
As the Wikipedia article Power of a point indicates, the tangent to the circle from the origin distance squared is the product of the two roots, but this is just $,c/a.$
answered Nov 14 at 22:04
Somos
12.8k11034
12.8k11034
Thanks for your answer. I did not know this, and I am reading about!
– user559615
Nov 14 at 22:10
... But I can I visualize this onto the above construction, in the context of the Quadratic Formula, I mean?
– user559615
Nov 14 at 22:12
I'm working on it.
– Somos
Nov 14 at 22:20
Thanks! I also tried to go further.
– user559615
Nov 15 at 6:07
add a comment |
Thanks for your answer. I did not know this, and I am reading about!
– user559615
Nov 14 at 22:10
... But I can I visualize this onto the above construction, in the context of the Quadratic Formula, I mean?
– user559615
Nov 14 at 22:12
I'm working on it.
– Somos
Nov 14 at 22:20
Thanks! I also tried to go further.
– user559615
Nov 15 at 6:07
Thanks for your answer. I did not know this, and I am reading about!
– user559615
Nov 14 at 22:10
Thanks for your answer. I did not know this, and I am reading about!
– user559615
Nov 14 at 22:10
... But I can I visualize this onto the above construction, in the context of the Quadratic Formula, I mean?
– user559615
Nov 14 at 22:12
... But I can I visualize this onto the above construction, in the context of the Quadratic Formula, I mean?
– user559615
Nov 14 at 22:12
I'm working on it.
– Somos
Nov 14 at 22:20
I'm working on it.
– Somos
Nov 14 at 22:20
Thanks! I also tried to go further.
– user559615
Nov 15 at 6:07
Thanks! I also tried to go further.
– user559615
Nov 15 at 6:07
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The coefficients $a,b,c$ of the quadratic equation $ax^2+bx^2+c=0$ are not very geometric, so let's work with some slightly different variables that do have a geometric meaning:
begin{align}
alpha &= -frac b{2a}, & beta &= -frac cb, & gamma &= c.
end{align}
In reverse order, $C=(0,gamma)$ is the $y$-intercept of the parabola, $B=(beta,0)$ is the point where the tangent through $C$ meets the $x$-axis, and $A=(alpha,0)$ is the point on the $x$-axis with the same $x$-coordinate as the parabola's focus. The parabola is specified via $alpha,beta,gamma$, and we need to find the points $P$ and $Q$ where it crosses the $x$-axis.
Blue: given data, gray: constructed, green: equal quantities, red: desired roots
Denote the focus by $F$ and the intersection of the directrix and the $y$-axis by $D$.
Construct the line $CF$ using the property of the parabola that the tangent $CB$ bisects $angle OCF$. Obtain $F$ as the intersection of $CF$ and the vertical through $A$.
Obtain $D$ using the fact that $C$ is equidistant from $F$ and $D$. The directrix is the horizontal through $D$, and is at distance $|OD|$ from the $x$-axis.
Obtain $P$ and $Q$ as the points on the $x$-axis at distance $|OD|$ from $F$.
$P$ and $Q$ are equidistant from $F$ and the directrix, and so lie on the parabola.
To derive the quadratic formula from this, we take an additional step, which may or may not be acceptable from a pure Euclidean-geometry perspective: We note that moving $C$ along the $y$-axis doesn't change the location of the roots, since it just scales the parabola vertically about the $x$-axis. Therefore, we may choose $C$ freely to simplify the construction.
In particular, let us take $C=(0,beta)$. Then $angle OCB=45^circ$, so the line $CF$ is horizontal, and $F=(alpha,beta)$. Now $|CD|=|CF|=alpha$, so $|OD|=alpha-beta$. The right triangle $triangle AFP$ has hypotenuse $|FP|=|OD|=alpha-beta$ and vertical side $|AF|=beta$, so the horizontal side is $|AP|=sqrt{(alpha-beta)^2-beta^2}=sqrt{alpha^2-2alphabeta}$; the same is true for $|AQ|$. Therefore,
begin{align}
{|OP|,|OQ|} &= |OA| pm |AP| \
&= alpha pm sqrt{alpha^2-2alphabeta}.
end{align}
Plug in the values of $alpha$ and $beta$ from above, and you obtain the quadratic formula.
Great!!!! Thanks a lot. I am studying it.
– user559615
Nov 17 at 12:55
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The coefficients $a,b,c$ of the quadratic equation $ax^2+bx^2+c=0$ are not very geometric, so let's work with some slightly different variables that do have a geometric meaning:
begin{align}
alpha &= -frac b{2a}, & beta &= -frac cb, & gamma &= c.
end{align}
In reverse order, $C=(0,gamma)$ is the $y$-intercept of the parabola, $B=(beta,0)$ is the point where the tangent through $C$ meets the $x$-axis, and $A=(alpha,0)$ is the point on the $x$-axis with the same $x$-coordinate as the parabola's focus. The parabola is specified via $alpha,beta,gamma$, and we need to find the points $P$ and $Q$ where it crosses the $x$-axis.
Blue: given data, gray: constructed, green: equal quantities, red: desired roots
Denote the focus by $F$ and the intersection of the directrix and the $y$-axis by $D$.
Construct the line $CF$ using the property of the parabola that the tangent $CB$ bisects $angle OCF$. Obtain $F$ as the intersection of $CF$ and the vertical through $A$.
Obtain $D$ using the fact that $C$ is equidistant from $F$ and $D$. The directrix is the horizontal through $D$, and is at distance $|OD|$ from the $x$-axis.
Obtain $P$ and $Q$ as the points on the $x$-axis at distance $|OD|$ from $F$.
$P$ and $Q$ are equidistant from $F$ and the directrix, and so lie on the parabola.
To derive the quadratic formula from this, we take an additional step, which may or may not be acceptable from a pure Euclidean-geometry perspective: We note that moving $C$ along the $y$-axis doesn't change the location of the roots, since it just scales the parabola vertically about the $x$-axis. Therefore, we may choose $C$ freely to simplify the construction.
In particular, let us take $C=(0,beta)$. Then $angle OCB=45^circ$, so the line $CF$ is horizontal, and $F=(alpha,beta)$. Now $|CD|=|CF|=alpha$, so $|OD|=alpha-beta$. The right triangle $triangle AFP$ has hypotenuse $|FP|=|OD|=alpha-beta$ and vertical side $|AF|=beta$, so the horizontal side is $|AP|=sqrt{(alpha-beta)^2-beta^2}=sqrt{alpha^2-2alphabeta}$; the same is true for $|AQ|$. Therefore,
begin{align}
{|OP|,|OQ|} &= |OA| pm |AP| \
&= alpha pm sqrt{alpha^2-2alphabeta}.
end{align}
Plug in the values of $alpha$ and $beta$ from above, and you obtain the quadratic formula.
Great!!!! Thanks a lot. I am studying it.
– user559615
Nov 17 at 12:55
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The coefficients $a,b,c$ of the quadratic equation $ax^2+bx^2+c=0$ are not very geometric, so let's work with some slightly different variables that do have a geometric meaning:
begin{align}
alpha &= -frac b{2a}, & beta &= -frac cb, & gamma &= c.
end{align}
In reverse order, $C=(0,gamma)$ is the $y$-intercept of the parabola, $B=(beta,0)$ is the point where the tangent through $C$ meets the $x$-axis, and $A=(alpha,0)$ is the point on the $x$-axis with the same $x$-coordinate as the parabola's focus. The parabola is specified via $alpha,beta,gamma$, and we need to find the points $P$ and $Q$ where it crosses the $x$-axis.
Blue: given data, gray: constructed, green: equal quantities, red: desired roots
Denote the focus by $F$ and the intersection of the directrix and the $y$-axis by $D$.
Construct the line $CF$ using the property of the parabola that the tangent $CB$ bisects $angle OCF$. Obtain $F$ as the intersection of $CF$ and the vertical through $A$.
Obtain $D$ using the fact that $C$ is equidistant from $F$ and $D$. The directrix is the horizontal through $D$, and is at distance $|OD|$ from the $x$-axis.
Obtain $P$ and $Q$ as the points on the $x$-axis at distance $|OD|$ from $F$.
$P$ and $Q$ are equidistant from $F$ and the directrix, and so lie on the parabola.
To derive the quadratic formula from this, we take an additional step, which may or may not be acceptable from a pure Euclidean-geometry perspective: We note that moving $C$ along the $y$-axis doesn't change the location of the roots, since it just scales the parabola vertically about the $x$-axis. Therefore, we may choose $C$ freely to simplify the construction.
In particular, let us take $C=(0,beta)$. Then $angle OCB=45^circ$, so the line $CF$ is horizontal, and $F=(alpha,beta)$. Now $|CD|=|CF|=alpha$, so $|OD|=alpha-beta$. The right triangle $triangle AFP$ has hypotenuse $|FP|=|OD|=alpha-beta$ and vertical side $|AF|=beta$, so the horizontal side is $|AP|=sqrt{(alpha-beta)^2-beta^2}=sqrt{alpha^2-2alphabeta}$; the same is true for $|AQ|$. Therefore,
begin{align}
{|OP|,|OQ|} &= |OA| pm |AP| \
&= alpha pm sqrt{alpha^2-2alphabeta}.
end{align}
Plug in the values of $alpha$ and $beta$ from above, and you obtain the quadratic formula.
The coefficients $a,b,c$ of the quadratic equation $ax^2+bx^2+c=0$ are not very geometric, so let's work with some slightly different variables that do have a geometric meaning:
begin{align}
alpha &= -frac b{2a}, & beta &= -frac cb, & gamma &= c.
end{align}
In reverse order, $C=(0,gamma)$ is the $y$-intercept of the parabola, $B=(beta,0)$ is the point where the tangent through $C$ meets the $x$-axis, and $A=(alpha,0)$ is the point on the $x$-axis with the same $x$-coordinate as the parabola's focus. The parabola is specified via $alpha,beta,gamma$, and we need to find the points $P$ and $Q$ where it crosses the $x$-axis.
Blue: given data, gray: constructed, green: equal quantities, red: desired roots
Denote the focus by $F$ and the intersection of the directrix and the $y$-axis by $D$.
Construct the line $CF$ using the property of the parabola that the tangent $CB$ bisects $angle OCF$. Obtain $F$ as the intersection of $CF$ and the vertical through $A$.
Obtain $D$ using the fact that $C$ is equidistant from $F$ and $D$. The directrix is the horizontal through $D$, and is at distance $|OD|$ from the $x$-axis.
Obtain $P$ and $Q$ as the points on the $x$-axis at distance $|OD|$ from $F$.
$P$ and $Q$ are equidistant from $F$ and the directrix, and so lie on the parabola.
To derive the quadratic formula from this, we take an additional step, which may or may not be acceptable from a pure Euclidean-geometry perspective: We note that moving $C$ along the $y$-axis doesn't change the location of the roots, since it just scales the parabola vertically about the $x$-axis. Therefore, we may choose $C$ freely to simplify the construction.
In particular, let us take $C=(0,beta)$. Then $angle OCB=45^circ$, so the line $CF$ is horizontal, and $F=(alpha,beta)$. Now $|CD|=|CF|=alpha$, so $|OD|=alpha-beta$. The right triangle $triangle AFP$ has hypotenuse $|FP|=|OD|=alpha-beta$ and vertical side $|AF|=beta$, so the horizontal side is $|AP|=sqrt{(alpha-beta)^2-beta^2}=sqrt{alpha^2-2alphabeta}$; the same is true for $|AQ|$. Therefore,
begin{align}
{|OP|,|OQ|} &= |OA| pm |AP| \
&= alpha pm sqrt{alpha^2-2alphabeta}.
end{align}
Plug in the values of $alpha$ and $beta$ from above, and you obtain the quadratic formula.
edited Nov 17 at 14:56
answered Nov 17 at 11:40
Rahul
32.9k466165
32.9k466165
Great!!!! Thanks a lot. I am studying it.
– user559615
Nov 17 at 12:55
add a comment |
Great!!!! Thanks a lot. I am studying it.
– user559615
Nov 17 at 12:55
Great!!!! Thanks a lot. I am studying it.
– user559615
Nov 17 at 12:55
Great!!!! Thanks a lot. I am studying it.
– user559615
Nov 17 at 12:55
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998671%2fproof-without-words-of-the-quadratic-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
An obvious interpretation of one of the terms is that $-b/2a$ is the x coordinate of the vertex and thus the location of point H.
– Daniel Gendin
Nov 14 at 20:27
@DanielGendin The more obvious, the better! Thanks!
– user559615
Nov 14 at 20:35
2
I prefer to write the quadratic formula as $x=frac{-b}{2a}pmsqrt{left(frac{-b}{2a}right)^2-frac{c}{a}}$. Thanks to Daniel's comment we already know what $-b/2a$ is. Now there is only $c/a$ left to explain.
– Rahul
Nov 14 at 20:37
@Rahul True. Good observation. But "where" is $a$? Of course, I know that it is the amplitude of the parabola, but I cannot easily show its exact value on this plot. However, $c/a$ suggests me the ratio between two sides of a triangle...
– user559615
Nov 14 at 20:45
1
I don't see how. But here's an observation: The tangent from the $y$-intercept meets the $x$-axis at a point $J$ with abscissa $-c/b$. Then $2|OH|,|OJ|=2(-b/2a)(-c/b)=c/a$. Not sure if this helps.
– Rahul
Nov 16 at 5:16