Finding elements of $mathbb{Z}_3[x] /langle x^2+2rangle$ and writing the multiplication table
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to list elements of $mathbb{Z}_3[x] /langle x^2+2rangle$ and write a multiplication table. Here is my attempt to finding the elements:
Let $A =langle x^2+2rangle= {(x^2+2)f(x): f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ and $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A = {f(x) + A: f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ by definition.
Let $f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$. By division algorithm, $f(x) = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx$ for some $q(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$ and $a,b in mathbb{Z}_3$. Hence, $f(x) + A = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx + A = a + bx + (x^2+2)q(x) + A$. Since $(x^2+2)q(x) in A$, $(x^2+2)q(x) + A = A$. Thus, $f(x) + A = a + bx + A$. So we have $mathbb{Z_3}[x] / A = {a + bx + A: a,b in mathbb{Z_3}}$. Hence, the elements are the following:
- $A$
- $1 + A$
- $x + A$
- $2 + A$
- $2x + A$
- $1 + x + A$
- $2 + x + A$
- $2 + 2x + A$
- $1 + 2x + A$
My question is:
1) Is this the right derivation?
2) How does multiplication table work in $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A$? For example, if I have $(x+A)(1+2x+A) = x(1+2x) + A = x+2x^2 + A$ which is not in the same form as $ax+b+A$.
abstract-algebra polynomials ring-theory
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to list elements of $mathbb{Z}_3[x] /langle x^2+2rangle$ and write a multiplication table. Here is my attempt to finding the elements:
Let $A =langle x^2+2rangle= {(x^2+2)f(x): f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ and $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A = {f(x) + A: f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ by definition.
Let $f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$. By division algorithm, $f(x) = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx$ for some $q(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$ and $a,b in mathbb{Z}_3$. Hence, $f(x) + A = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx + A = a + bx + (x^2+2)q(x) + A$. Since $(x^2+2)q(x) in A$, $(x^2+2)q(x) + A = A$. Thus, $f(x) + A = a + bx + A$. So we have $mathbb{Z_3}[x] / A = {a + bx + A: a,b in mathbb{Z_3}}$. Hence, the elements are the following:
- $A$
- $1 + A$
- $x + A$
- $2 + A$
- $2x + A$
- $1 + x + A$
- $2 + x + A$
- $2 + 2x + A$
- $1 + 2x + A$
My question is:
1) Is this the right derivation?
2) How does multiplication table work in $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A$? For example, if I have $(x+A)(1+2x+A) = x(1+2x) + A = x+2x^2 + A$ which is not in the same form as $ax+b+A$.
abstract-algebra polynomials ring-theory
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to list elements of $mathbb{Z}_3[x] /langle x^2+2rangle$ and write a multiplication table. Here is my attempt to finding the elements:
Let $A =langle x^2+2rangle= {(x^2+2)f(x): f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ and $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A = {f(x) + A: f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ by definition.
Let $f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$. By division algorithm, $f(x) = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx$ for some $q(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$ and $a,b in mathbb{Z}_3$. Hence, $f(x) + A = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx + A = a + bx + (x^2+2)q(x) + A$. Since $(x^2+2)q(x) in A$, $(x^2+2)q(x) + A = A$. Thus, $f(x) + A = a + bx + A$. So we have $mathbb{Z_3}[x] / A = {a + bx + A: a,b in mathbb{Z_3}}$. Hence, the elements are the following:
- $A$
- $1 + A$
- $x + A$
- $2 + A$
- $2x + A$
- $1 + x + A$
- $2 + x + A$
- $2 + 2x + A$
- $1 + 2x + A$
My question is:
1) Is this the right derivation?
2) How does multiplication table work in $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A$? For example, if I have $(x+A)(1+2x+A) = x(1+2x) + A = x+2x^2 + A$ which is not in the same form as $ax+b+A$.
abstract-algebra polynomials ring-theory
I want to list elements of $mathbb{Z}_3[x] /langle x^2+2rangle$ and write a multiplication table. Here is my attempt to finding the elements:
Let $A =langle x^2+2rangle= {(x^2+2)f(x): f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ and $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A = {f(x) + A: f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]}$ by definition.
Let $f(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$. By division algorithm, $f(x) = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx$ for some $q(x) in mathbb{Z}_3[x]$ and $a,b in mathbb{Z}_3$. Hence, $f(x) + A = (x^2+2)q(x) + a + bx + A = a + bx + (x^2+2)q(x) + A$. Since $(x^2+2)q(x) in A$, $(x^2+2)q(x) + A = A$. Thus, $f(x) + A = a + bx + A$. So we have $mathbb{Z_3}[x] / A = {a + bx + A: a,b in mathbb{Z_3}}$. Hence, the elements are the following:
- $A$
- $1 + A$
- $x + A$
- $2 + A$
- $2x + A$
- $1 + x + A$
- $2 + x + A$
- $2 + 2x + A$
- $1 + 2x + A$
My question is:
1) Is this the right derivation?
2) How does multiplication table work in $mathbb{Z}_3[x] / A$? For example, if I have $(x+A)(1+2x+A) = x(1+2x) + A = x+2x^2 + A$ which is not in the same form as $ax+b+A$.
abstract-algebra polynomials ring-theory
abstract-algebra polynomials ring-theory
edited Nov 20 at 16:23
José Carlos Santos
144k20114214
144k20114214
asked Nov 20 at 16:11
Ted
738
738
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
- Yes, that is the right derivation.
- Now, divide $2x^2+x$ by $x^2+2$. That is easy:$$2x^2+x=2times(x^2+2).$$So, the remainder is $0$, wich means that, in your ring, $(x+A)(1+2x+A)=0+A=0$. In particular, your ring is not a field (not a surprise, since $x^2+2=(x+1)(x+2)$ in $mathbb{Z}_3[x]$).
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Using mod notation, in the quotient ring we have $,color{#c00}{x^2}equiv -2equivcolor{#c00}1,$ which implies every polynomial is congruent to one of degree $le 1,,$ because $,x^{large 2q+r}! = (color{#c00}{x^{large 2}})^{large q},x^{large r} equiv color{#c00}{1}^{large q},x^{large r}equiv x^{large r}, $ for $,rin {0,1}$
Alternatively breaking into even+odd parts $,f(x) = g(color{#c00}{x^2}) + x, h(color{#c00}{x^2})$ $Rightarrow, f(x)equiv g(color{#c00}{1}) + x, h(color{#c00}{1})$
Or we can apply Division with Remainder: $,f(x) = q(x) (color{#c00}{x^2}!-!color{#c00}1) + ax+b,Rightarrow, f(x)equiv ax+b$
So every $f(x)$ is congruent to $,(f,bmod x^2!-!1)bmod 3,$ having degree $le 1$, and these linear reps $,f,g,$ are incongruent else $,x^2-1,$ divides a lower degree polynomial $,f - g notequiv 0pmod{!3}.,$ Therefore they comprise a complete set of representatives of the quotient ring classes (cosets). In particular, there are $,3^2 = 9$ such linear reps $,ax+b$ corresponding to the $3$ choices for the coef's $,a,bbmod 3$. Your table correctly lists these $9$ reps.
To multiply these linear normal-form reps compute the polynomial product then replace $,color{#c00}{x^2},$ by $,color{#c00}{1},$
$$ (a_1x + a_0)(b_1 x + b_0), equiv, (a_0 b_1 + a_1 b_0), x + a_0 b_0 color{#c00}{+1},a_1 b_1$$
while performing coefficient arithmetic $!bmod 3.,$ The coefficient arithmetic will be slightly simpler if we use $,-1,$ vs. $,2,$ as our rep for $,2+3Bbb Z,,$ which also serves to clarify innate algebraic structure, e.g. $,(x+1)(x-1) = color{#c00}{x^2}-color{#c00}1equiv 0,$ vs. $,(x+1)(x+2)equiv color{#c00}{x^2}+3x+color{#c00}2equiv 0$
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
- Yes, that is the right derivation.
- Now, divide $2x^2+x$ by $x^2+2$. That is easy:$$2x^2+x=2times(x^2+2).$$So, the remainder is $0$, wich means that, in your ring, $(x+A)(1+2x+A)=0+A=0$. In particular, your ring is not a field (not a surprise, since $x^2+2=(x+1)(x+2)$ in $mathbb{Z}_3[x]$).
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
- Yes, that is the right derivation.
- Now, divide $2x^2+x$ by $x^2+2$. That is easy:$$2x^2+x=2times(x^2+2).$$So, the remainder is $0$, wich means that, in your ring, $(x+A)(1+2x+A)=0+A=0$. In particular, your ring is not a field (not a surprise, since $x^2+2=(x+1)(x+2)$ in $mathbb{Z}_3[x]$).
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
- Yes, that is the right derivation.
- Now, divide $2x^2+x$ by $x^2+2$. That is easy:$$2x^2+x=2times(x^2+2).$$So, the remainder is $0$, wich means that, in your ring, $(x+A)(1+2x+A)=0+A=0$. In particular, your ring is not a field (not a surprise, since $x^2+2=(x+1)(x+2)$ in $mathbb{Z}_3[x]$).
- Yes, that is the right derivation.
- Now, divide $2x^2+x$ by $x^2+2$. That is easy:$$2x^2+x=2times(x^2+2).$$So, the remainder is $0$, wich means that, in your ring, $(x+A)(1+2x+A)=0+A=0$. In particular, your ring is not a field (not a surprise, since $x^2+2=(x+1)(x+2)$ in $mathbb{Z}_3[x]$).
answered Nov 20 at 16:22
José Carlos Santos
144k20114214
144k20114214
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Using mod notation, in the quotient ring we have $,color{#c00}{x^2}equiv -2equivcolor{#c00}1,$ which implies every polynomial is congruent to one of degree $le 1,,$ because $,x^{large 2q+r}! = (color{#c00}{x^{large 2}})^{large q},x^{large r} equiv color{#c00}{1}^{large q},x^{large r}equiv x^{large r}, $ for $,rin {0,1}$
Alternatively breaking into even+odd parts $,f(x) = g(color{#c00}{x^2}) + x, h(color{#c00}{x^2})$ $Rightarrow, f(x)equiv g(color{#c00}{1}) + x, h(color{#c00}{1})$
Or we can apply Division with Remainder: $,f(x) = q(x) (color{#c00}{x^2}!-!color{#c00}1) + ax+b,Rightarrow, f(x)equiv ax+b$
So every $f(x)$ is congruent to $,(f,bmod x^2!-!1)bmod 3,$ having degree $le 1$, and these linear reps $,f,g,$ are incongruent else $,x^2-1,$ divides a lower degree polynomial $,f - g notequiv 0pmod{!3}.,$ Therefore they comprise a complete set of representatives of the quotient ring classes (cosets). In particular, there are $,3^2 = 9$ such linear reps $,ax+b$ corresponding to the $3$ choices for the coef's $,a,bbmod 3$. Your table correctly lists these $9$ reps.
To multiply these linear normal-form reps compute the polynomial product then replace $,color{#c00}{x^2},$ by $,color{#c00}{1},$
$$ (a_1x + a_0)(b_1 x + b_0), equiv, (a_0 b_1 + a_1 b_0), x + a_0 b_0 color{#c00}{+1},a_1 b_1$$
while performing coefficient arithmetic $!bmod 3.,$ The coefficient arithmetic will be slightly simpler if we use $,-1,$ vs. $,2,$ as our rep for $,2+3Bbb Z,,$ which also serves to clarify innate algebraic structure, e.g. $,(x+1)(x-1) = color{#c00}{x^2}-color{#c00}1equiv 0,$ vs. $,(x+1)(x+2)equiv color{#c00}{x^2}+3x+color{#c00}2equiv 0$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Using mod notation, in the quotient ring we have $,color{#c00}{x^2}equiv -2equivcolor{#c00}1,$ which implies every polynomial is congruent to one of degree $le 1,,$ because $,x^{large 2q+r}! = (color{#c00}{x^{large 2}})^{large q},x^{large r} equiv color{#c00}{1}^{large q},x^{large r}equiv x^{large r}, $ for $,rin {0,1}$
Alternatively breaking into even+odd parts $,f(x) = g(color{#c00}{x^2}) + x, h(color{#c00}{x^2})$ $Rightarrow, f(x)equiv g(color{#c00}{1}) + x, h(color{#c00}{1})$
Or we can apply Division with Remainder: $,f(x) = q(x) (color{#c00}{x^2}!-!color{#c00}1) + ax+b,Rightarrow, f(x)equiv ax+b$
So every $f(x)$ is congruent to $,(f,bmod x^2!-!1)bmod 3,$ having degree $le 1$, and these linear reps $,f,g,$ are incongruent else $,x^2-1,$ divides a lower degree polynomial $,f - g notequiv 0pmod{!3}.,$ Therefore they comprise a complete set of representatives of the quotient ring classes (cosets). In particular, there are $,3^2 = 9$ such linear reps $,ax+b$ corresponding to the $3$ choices for the coef's $,a,bbmod 3$. Your table correctly lists these $9$ reps.
To multiply these linear normal-form reps compute the polynomial product then replace $,color{#c00}{x^2},$ by $,color{#c00}{1},$
$$ (a_1x + a_0)(b_1 x + b_0), equiv, (a_0 b_1 + a_1 b_0), x + a_0 b_0 color{#c00}{+1},a_1 b_1$$
while performing coefficient arithmetic $!bmod 3.,$ The coefficient arithmetic will be slightly simpler if we use $,-1,$ vs. $,2,$ as our rep for $,2+3Bbb Z,,$ which also serves to clarify innate algebraic structure, e.g. $,(x+1)(x-1) = color{#c00}{x^2}-color{#c00}1equiv 0,$ vs. $,(x+1)(x+2)equiv color{#c00}{x^2}+3x+color{#c00}2equiv 0$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Using mod notation, in the quotient ring we have $,color{#c00}{x^2}equiv -2equivcolor{#c00}1,$ which implies every polynomial is congruent to one of degree $le 1,,$ because $,x^{large 2q+r}! = (color{#c00}{x^{large 2}})^{large q},x^{large r} equiv color{#c00}{1}^{large q},x^{large r}equiv x^{large r}, $ for $,rin {0,1}$
Alternatively breaking into even+odd parts $,f(x) = g(color{#c00}{x^2}) + x, h(color{#c00}{x^2})$ $Rightarrow, f(x)equiv g(color{#c00}{1}) + x, h(color{#c00}{1})$
Or we can apply Division with Remainder: $,f(x) = q(x) (color{#c00}{x^2}!-!color{#c00}1) + ax+b,Rightarrow, f(x)equiv ax+b$
So every $f(x)$ is congruent to $,(f,bmod x^2!-!1)bmod 3,$ having degree $le 1$, and these linear reps $,f,g,$ are incongruent else $,x^2-1,$ divides a lower degree polynomial $,f - g notequiv 0pmod{!3}.,$ Therefore they comprise a complete set of representatives of the quotient ring classes (cosets). In particular, there are $,3^2 = 9$ such linear reps $,ax+b$ corresponding to the $3$ choices for the coef's $,a,bbmod 3$. Your table correctly lists these $9$ reps.
To multiply these linear normal-form reps compute the polynomial product then replace $,color{#c00}{x^2},$ by $,color{#c00}{1},$
$$ (a_1x + a_0)(b_1 x + b_0), equiv, (a_0 b_1 + a_1 b_0), x + a_0 b_0 color{#c00}{+1},a_1 b_1$$
while performing coefficient arithmetic $!bmod 3.,$ The coefficient arithmetic will be slightly simpler if we use $,-1,$ vs. $,2,$ as our rep for $,2+3Bbb Z,,$ which also serves to clarify innate algebraic structure, e.g. $,(x+1)(x-1) = color{#c00}{x^2}-color{#c00}1equiv 0,$ vs. $,(x+1)(x+2)equiv color{#c00}{x^2}+3x+color{#c00}2equiv 0$
Using mod notation, in the quotient ring we have $,color{#c00}{x^2}equiv -2equivcolor{#c00}1,$ which implies every polynomial is congruent to one of degree $le 1,,$ because $,x^{large 2q+r}! = (color{#c00}{x^{large 2}})^{large q},x^{large r} equiv color{#c00}{1}^{large q},x^{large r}equiv x^{large r}, $ for $,rin {0,1}$
Alternatively breaking into even+odd parts $,f(x) = g(color{#c00}{x^2}) + x, h(color{#c00}{x^2})$ $Rightarrow, f(x)equiv g(color{#c00}{1}) + x, h(color{#c00}{1})$
Or we can apply Division with Remainder: $,f(x) = q(x) (color{#c00}{x^2}!-!color{#c00}1) + ax+b,Rightarrow, f(x)equiv ax+b$
So every $f(x)$ is congruent to $,(f,bmod x^2!-!1)bmod 3,$ having degree $le 1$, and these linear reps $,f,g,$ are incongruent else $,x^2-1,$ divides a lower degree polynomial $,f - g notequiv 0pmod{!3}.,$ Therefore they comprise a complete set of representatives of the quotient ring classes (cosets). In particular, there are $,3^2 = 9$ such linear reps $,ax+b$ corresponding to the $3$ choices for the coef's $,a,bbmod 3$. Your table correctly lists these $9$ reps.
To multiply these linear normal-form reps compute the polynomial product then replace $,color{#c00}{x^2},$ by $,color{#c00}{1},$
$$ (a_1x + a_0)(b_1 x + b_0), equiv, (a_0 b_1 + a_1 b_0), x + a_0 b_0 color{#c00}{+1},a_1 b_1$$
while performing coefficient arithmetic $!bmod 3.,$ The coefficient arithmetic will be slightly simpler if we use $,-1,$ vs. $,2,$ as our rep for $,2+3Bbb Z,,$ which also serves to clarify innate algebraic structure, e.g. $,(x+1)(x-1) = color{#c00}{x^2}-color{#c00}1equiv 0,$ vs. $,(x+1)(x+2)equiv color{#c00}{x^2}+3x+color{#c00}2equiv 0$
edited Nov 20 at 18:10
answered Nov 20 at 17:40
Bill Dubuque
207k29189624
207k29189624
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006512%2ffinding-elements-of-mathbbz-3x-langle-x22-rangle-and-writing-the-mult%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown