Hermite polynomials and primality testing
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Can you provide a proof or a counterexample for the claim given below ?
Inspired by Agrawal's conjecture in this paper I have formulated the following claim :
Let $n$ be a natural number greater than two . Let $r$ be the smallest odd prime number such that $r nmid n$ and $n^2 notequiv 1 pmod r$ . Let $H_n(x)$ be Hermite polynomial , then $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$ if and only if $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$ .
You can run this test here .
Mathematica implementation of test :
n=31;
r=3;
While[Mod[n,r]==0 || PowerMod[n,2,r]==1,r=NextPrime[r]];
If[PolynomialMod[PolynomialRemainder[HermiteH[n,x],x^r-1,x],n]-PolynomialRemainder[2*x^n,x^r-1,x]===0,Print["probably prime"],Print["composite"]];
elementary-number-theory prime-numbers examples-counterexamples primality-test
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Can you provide a proof or a counterexample for the claim given below ?
Inspired by Agrawal's conjecture in this paper I have formulated the following claim :
Let $n$ be a natural number greater than two . Let $r$ be the smallest odd prime number such that $r nmid n$ and $n^2 notequiv 1 pmod r$ . Let $H_n(x)$ be Hermite polynomial , then $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$ if and only if $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$ .
You can run this test here .
Mathematica implementation of test :
n=31;
r=3;
While[Mod[n,r]==0 || PowerMod[n,2,r]==1,r=NextPrime[r]];
If[PolynomialMod[PolynomialRemainder[HermiteH[n,x],x^r-1,x],n]-PolynomialRemainder[2*x^n,x^r-1,x]===0,Print["probably prime"],Print["composite"]];
elementary-number-theory prime-numbers examples-counterexamples primality-test
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Can you provide a proof or a counterexample for the claim given below ?
Inspired by Agrawal's conjecture in this paper I have formulated the following claim :
Let $n$ be a natural number greater than two . Let $r$ be the smallest odd prime number such that $r nmid n$ and $n^2 notequiv 1 pmod r$ . Let $H_n(x)$ be Hermite polynomial , then $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$ if and only if $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$ .
You can run this test here .
Mathematica implementation of test :
n=31;
r=3;
While[Mod[n,r]==0 || PowerMod[n,2,r]==1,r=NextPrime[r]];
If[PolynomialMod[PolynomialRemainder[HermiteH[n,x],x^r-1,x],n]-PolynomialRemainder[2*x^n,x^r-1,x]===0,Print["probably prime"],Print["composite"]];
elementary-number-theory prime-numbers examples-counterexamples primality-test
Can you provide a proof or a counterexample for the claim given below ?
Inspired by Agrawal's conjecture in this paper I have formulated the following claim :
Let $n$ be a natural number greater than two . Let $r$ be the smallest odd prime number such that $r nmid n$ and $n^2 notequiv 1 pmod r$ . Let $H_n(x)$ be Hermite polynomial , then $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$ if and only if $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$ .
You can run this test here .
Mathematica implementation of test :
n=31;
r=3;
While[Mod[n,r]==0 || PowerMod[n,2,r]==1,r=NextPrime[r]];
If[PolynomialMod[PolynomialRemainder[HermiteH[n,x],x^r-1,x],n]-PolynomialRemainder[2*x^n,x^r-1,x]===0,Print["probably prime"],Print["composite"]];
elementary-number-theory prime-numbers examples-counterexamples primality-test
elementary-number-theory prime-numbers examples-counterexamples primality-test
asked Sep 23 at 9:37
Peđa Terzić
7,87022569
7,87022569
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
The claim is not true.
It is not true that if $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$, then $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$.
Proof :
Let us consider the case where $n$ is an even number greater than $2$.
So, $n$ is neither a prime number nor Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$.
Using the following expression
$$H_{2k}=(-1)^k2^k(2k-1)!!left(1+sum_{j=1}^{k}frac{(-4k)(-4k+4)cdots (-4k+4j-4)}{(2j)!}x^{2j}right)$$
we have, using $(n-1)!!cdot 2^{frac n2}(frac n2)!=n!$,
$$begin{align}H_{n}&=(-1)^{frac n2}2^{frac n2}(n-1)!!left(1+sum_{j=1}^{frac n2}frac{(-2n)(-2n+4)cdots (-2n+4j-4)}{(2j)!}x^{2j}right)
\\&=(-1)^{frac n2}2^{frac n2}(n-1)!!bigg(1+frac{(-2n)(-2n+4)cdots (-4)}{n!}x^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac n2-1}frac{(-2n)(-2n+4)cdots (-2n+4j-4)}{(2j)!}x^{2j}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac n2}2^{frac n2}(n-1)!!bigg(1+frac{(-4)^{frac n2}(frac n2)!}{n!}x^{n}+sum_{j=1}^{frac n2-1}frac{(-4)^j(frac n2)!}{(frac{n-2j}{2})!(2j)!}x^{2j}bigg)
\\&=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^n+frac{(-1)^{frac n2}n!}{(frac n2)!}+n(-1)^{frac n2}sum_{j=1}^{frac n2-1}frac{(n-2j-1)!}{(frac{n-2j}{2})!}binom{n-1}{2j}(-4)^j
end{align}$$
So, there is a polynomial $f$ with integer coefficients such that
$$H_n(x)=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^n+(x^r-1)times 0+nf$$
Now, if $n$ is an even pseudoprime to base 2, then we get $2^n-2equiv 0pmod n$, so it follows that $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$.
Therefore, $n=161038$ is a counterexample.$qquadblacksquare$
It is true that if $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$, then $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$.
Proof :
For $n=3$, we have
$$H_3(x)=2x^3+(x^r-1)times 0+3(2x^3-4x)equiv 0pmod {x^r-1,3}$$
In the following, $n$ is an odd number greater than $3$.
Using the following expression
$$H_{2k+1}(x)=(-1)^kcdot 2^{k+1}(2k+1)!!bigg(x+sum_{j=1}^{k}frac{(-4k)(-4k+4)cdots (-4k+4j-4)}{(2j+1)!}x^{2j+1}bigg)$$
we have, using $n!!cdot 2^{frac{n-1}{2}}(frac{n-1}{2})!=n!$,
$$begin{align}H_{n}(x)&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!bigg(x+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-1}{2}}frac{(-2n+2)(-2n+6)cdots (-2n+4j-2)}{(2j+1)!}x^{2j+1}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!bigg(x+frac{(-2n+2)(-2n+6)cdots (-4)}{n!}x^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(-2n+2)(-2n+6)cdots (-2n+4j-2)}{(2j+1)!}x^{2j+1}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!bigg(x+frac{(-4)^{frac{n-1}{2}}(frac{n-1}{2})!}{n!}x^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(-4)^j(frac{n-1}{2})!}{(2j+1)!(frac{n-2j-1}{2})!}x^{2j+1}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!x+2^nx^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{n!cdot(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}(-4)^{j}}{(2j+1)!left(frac{n-2j-1}{2}right)!cdot 2^{frac{n-1}{2}}}x^{2j+1}
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!x+2^nx^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquad+nsum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(n-2j-2)!binom{n-1}{2j+1}(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2cdot (-4)^{j}}{left(frac{n-2j-1}{2}right)!}x^{2j+1}
\\&=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^{n}+2n(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}sum_{j=color{red}{0}}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(n-2j-2)!}{left(frac{n-2j-1}{2}right)!}binom{n-1}{2j+1}(-4)^{j}x^{2j+1}
end{align}$$
So, there is a polynomial $g$ with integer coefficients such that
$$H_n(x)=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^n+(x^r-1)times 0+ng$$
Since $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$, we get $2^n-2equiv 0pmod n$.
It follows that $$H_n(x)equiv 2x^npmod{x^r-1,n}qquadblacksquare$$
Thank you for the clarification, I really appreciate it.
– Peđa Terzić
Nov 17 at 16:33
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Please let me know if this is way off base.
We know $rnot|n$ and $n^{2} not equiv 1 mod r$. Therefore, from the latter part of the statement we know $rnot| n^{2}-1$ which is equivalent to $rnot |(n-1)$ and $rnot|(n+1)$. So for any $n$ we have two cases. The first being $n-1$ is odd, $n$ is even, and $n+1$ is odd. The second being $n-1$ is even, $n$ is odd, and $n+1$ is even. Since in both circumstances we have an even integer we know $nnot = 2$. Because we have three consecutive integers, that are greater than 2, we must have at least one that is divisible by $3$.
So the fact that we cannot have $3$, but you state that $n$ is a prime number greater than $2$ or pseudo-prime to base $2$ (smallest is $341$?) makes your proof invalid due to a contradiction in your consequent.
Once again, sorry if I am not understanding something.
New contributor
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
The claim is not true.
It is not true that if $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$, then $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$.
Proof :
Let us consider the case where $n$ is an even number greater than $2$.
So, $n$ is neither a prime number nor Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$.
Using the following expression
$$H_{2k}=(-1)^k2^k(2k-1)!!left(1+sum_{j=1}^{k}frac{(-4k)(-4k+4)cdots (-4k+4j-4)}{(2j)!}x^{2j}right)$$
we have, using $(n-1)!!cdot 2^{frac n2}(frac n2)!=n!$,
$$begin{align}H_{n}&=(-1)^{frac n2}2^{frac n2}(n-1)!!left(1+sum_{j=1}^{frac n2}frac{(-2n)(-2n+4)cdots (-2n+4j-4)}{(2j)!}x^{2j}right)
\\&=(-1)^{frac n2}2^{frac n2}(n-1)!!bigg(1+frac{(-2n)(-2n+4)cdots (-4)}{n!}x^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac n2-1}frac{(-2n)(-2n+4)cdots (-2n+4j-4)}{(2j)!}x^{2j}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac n2}2^{frac n2}(n-1)!!bigg(1+frac{(-4)^{frac n2}(frac n2)!}{n!}x^{n}+sum_{j=1}^{frac n2-1}frac{(-4)^j(frac n2)!}{(frac{n-2j}{2})!(2j)!}x^{2j}bigg)
\\&=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^n+frac{(-1)^{frac n2}n!}{(frac n2)!}+n(-1)^{frac n2}sum_{j=1}^{frac n2-1}frac{(n-2j-1)!}{(frac{n-2j}{2})!}binom{n-1}{2j}(-4)^j
end{align}$$
So, there is a polynomial $f$ with integer coefficients such that
$$H_n(x)=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^n+(x^r-1)times 0+nf$$
Now, if $n$ is an even pseudoprime to base 2, then we get $2^n-2equiv 0pmod n$, so it follows that $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$.
Therefore, $n=161038$ is a counterexample.$qquadblacksquare$
It is true that if $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$, then $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$.
Proof :
For $n=3$, we have
$$H_3(x)=2x^3+(x^r-1)times 0+3(2x^3-4x)equiv 0pmod {x^r-1,3}$$
In the following, $n$ is an odd number greater than $3$.
Using the following expression
$$H_{2k+1}(x)=(-1)^kcdot 2^{k+1}(2k+1)!!bigg(x+sum_{j=1}^{k}frac{(-4k)(-4k+4)cdots (-4k+4j-4)}{(2j+1)!}x^{2j+1}bigg)$$
we have, using $n!!cdot 2^{frac{n-1}{2}}(frac{n-1}{2})!=n!$,
$$begin{align}H_{n}(x)&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!bigg(x+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-1}{2}}frac{(-2n+2)(-2n+6)cdots (-2n+4j-2)}{(2j+1)!}x^{2j+1}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!bigg(x+frac{(-2n+2)(-2n+6)cdots (-4)}{n!}x^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(-2n+2)(-2n+6)cdots (-2n+4j-2)}{(2j+1)!}x^{2j+1}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!bigg(x+frac{(-4)^{frac{n-1}{2}}(frac{n-1}{2})!}{n!}x^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(-4)^j(frac{n-1}{2})!}{(2j+1)!(frac{n-2j-1}{2})!}x^{2j+1}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!x+2^nx^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{n!cdot(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}(-4)^{j}}{(2j+1)!left(frac{n-2j-1}{2}right)!cdot 2^{frac{n-1}{2}}}x^{2j+1}
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!x+2^nx^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquad+nsum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(n-2j-2)!binom{n-1}{2j+1}(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2cdot (-4)^{j}}{left(frac{n-2j-1}{2}right)!}x^{2j+1}
\\&=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^{n}+2n(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}sum_{j=color{red}{0}}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(n-2j-2)!}{left(frac{n-2j-1}{2}right)!}binom{n-1}{2j+1}(-4)^{j}x^{2j+1}
end{align}$$
So, there is a polynomial $g$ with integer coefficients such that
$$H_n(x)=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^n+(x^r-1)times 0+ng$$
Since $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$, we get $2^n-2equiv 0pmod n$.
It follows that $$H_n(x)equiv 2x^npmod{x^r-1,n}qquadblacksquare$$
Thank you for the clarification, I really appreciate it.
– Peđa Terzić
Nov 17 at 16:33
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
The claim is not true.
It is not true that if $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$, then $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$.
Proof :
Let us consider the case where $n$ is an even number greater than $2$.
So, $n$ is neither a prime number nor Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$.
Using the following expression
$$H_{2k}=(-1)^k2^k(2k-1)!!left(1+sum_{j=1}^{k}frac{(-4k)(-4k+4)cdots (-4k+4j-4)}{(2j)!}x^{2j}right)$$
we have, using $(n-1)!!cdot 2^{frac n2}(frac n2)!=n!$,
$$begin{align}H_{n}&=(-1)^{frac n2}2^{frac n2}(n-1)!!left(1+sum_{j=1}^{frac n2}frac{(-2n)(-2n+4)cdots (-2n+4j-4)}{(2j)!}x^{2j}right)
\\&=(-1)^{frac n2}2^{frac n2}(n-1)!!bigg(1+frac{(-2n)(-2n+4)cdots (-4)}{n!}x^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac n2-1}frac{(-2n)(-2n+4)cdots (-2n+4j-4)}{(2j)!}x^{2j}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac n2}2^{frac n2}(n-1)!!bigg(1+frac{(-4)^{frac n2}(frac n2)!}{n!}x^{n}+sum_{j=1}^{frac n2-1}frac{(-4)^j(frac n2)!}{(frac{n-2j}{2})!(2j)!}x^{2j}bigg)
\\&=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^n+frac{(-1)^{frac n2}n!}{(frac n2)!}+n(-1)^{frac n2}sum_{j=1}^{frac n2-1}frac{(n-2j-1)!}{(frac{n-2j}{2})!}binom{n-1}{2j}(-4)^j
end{align}$$
So, there is a polynomial $f$ with integer coefficients such that
$$H_n(x)=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^n+(x^r-1)times 0+nf$$
Now, if $n$ is an even pseudoprime to base 2, then we get $2^n-2equiv 0pmod n$, so it follows that $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$.
Therefore, $n=161038$ is a counterexample.$qquadblacksquare$
It is true that if $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$, then $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$.
Proof :
For $n=3$, we have
$$H_3(x)=2x^3+(x^r-1)times 0+3(2x^3-4x)equiv 0pmod {x^r-1,3}$$
In the following, $n$ is an odd number greater than $3$.
Using the following expression
$$H_{2k+1}(x)=(-1)^kcdot 2^{k+1}(2k+1)!!bigg(x+sum_{j=1}^{k}frac{(-4k)(-4k+4)cdots (-4k+4j-4)}{(2j+1)!}x^{2j+1}bigg)$$
we have, using $n!!cdot 2^{frac{n-1}{2}}(frac{n-1}{2})!=n!$,
$$begin{align}H_{n}(x)&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!bigg(x+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-1}{2}}frac{(-2n+2)(-2n+6)cdots (-2n+4j-2)}{(2j+1)!}x^{2j+1}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!bigg(x+frac{(-2n+2)(-2n+6)cdots (-4)}{n!}x^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(-2n+2)(-2n+6)cdots (-2n+4j-2)}{(2j+1)!}x^{2j+1}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!bigg(x+frac{(-4)^{frac{n-1}{2}}(frac{n-1}{2})!}{n!}x^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(-4)^j(frac{n-1}{2})!}{(2j+1)!(frac{n-2j-1}{2})!}x^{2j+1}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!x+2^nx^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{n!cdot(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}(-4)^{j}}{(2j+1)!left(frac{n-2j-1}{2}right)!cdot 2^{frac{n-1}{2}}}x^{2j+1}
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!x+2^nx^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquad+nsum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(n-2j-2)!binom{n-1}{2j+1}(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2cdot (-4)^{j}}{left(frac{n-2j-1}{2}right)!}x^{2j+1}
\\&=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^{n}+2n(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}sum_{j=color{red}{0}}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(n-2j-2)!}{left(frac{n-2j-1}{2}right)!}binom{n-1}{2j+1}(-4)^{j}x^{2j+1}
end{align}$$
So, there is a polynomial $g$ with integer coefficients such that
$$H_n(x)=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^n+(x^r-1)times 0+ng$$
Since $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$, we get $2^n-2equiv 0pmod n$.
It follows that $$H_n(x)equiv 2x^npmod{x^r-1,n}qquadblacksquare$$
Thank you for the clarification, I really appreciate it.
– Peđa Terzić
Nov 17 at 16:33
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
The claim is not true.
It is not true that if $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$, then $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$.
Proof :
Let us consider the case where $n$ is an even number greater than $2$.
So, $n$ is neither a prime number nor Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$.
Using the following expression
$$H_{2k}=(-1)^k2^k(2k-1)!!left(1+sum_{j=1}^{k}frac{(-4k)(-4k+4)cdots (-4k+4j-4)}{(2j)!}x^{2j}right)$$
we have, using $(n-1)!!cdot 2^{frac n2}(frac n2)!=n!$,
$$begin{align}H_{n}&=(-1)^{frac n2}2^{frac n2}(n-1)!!left(1+sum_{j=1}^{frac n2}frac{(-2n)(-2n+4)cdots (-2n+4j-4)}{(2j)!}x^{2j}right)
\\&=(-1)^{frac n2}2^{frac n2}(n-1)!!bigg(1+frac{(-2n)(-2n+4)cdots (-4)}{n!}x^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac n2-1}frac{(-2n)(-2n+4)cdots (-2n+4j-4)}{(2j)!}x^{2j}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac n2}2^{frac n2}(n-1)!!bigg(1+frac{(-4)^{frac n2}(frac n2)!}{n!}x^{n}+sum_{j=1}^{frac n2-1}frac{(-4)^j(frac n2)!}{(frac{n-2j}{2})!(2j)!}x^{2j}bigg)
\\&=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^n+frac{(-1)^{frac n2}n!}{(frac n2)!}+n(-1)^{frac n2}sum_{j=1}^{frac n2-1}frac{(n-2j-1)!}{(frac{n-2j}{2})!}binom{n-1}{2j}(-4)^j
end{align}$$
So, there is a polynomial $f$ with integer coefficients such that
$$H_n(x)=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^n+(x^r-1)times 0+nf$$
Now, if $n$ is an even pseudoprime to base 2, then we get $2^n-2equiv 0pmod n$, so it follows that $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$.
Therefore, $n=161038$ is a counterexample.$qquadblacksquare$
It is true that if $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$, then $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$.
Proof :
For $n=3$, we have
$$H_3(x)=2x^3+(x^r-1)times 0+3(2x^3-4x)equiv 0pmod {x^r-1,3}$$
In the following, $n$ is an odd number greater than $3$.
Using the following expression
$$H_{2k+1}(x)=(-1)^kcdot 2^{k+1}(2k+1)!!bigg(x+sum_{j=1}^{k}frac{(-4k)(-4k+4)cdots (-4k+4j-4)}{(2j+1)!}x^{2j+1}bigg)$$
we have, using $n!!cdot 2^{frac{n-1}{2}}(frac{n-1}{2})!=n!$,
$$begin{align}H_{n}(x)&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!bigg(x+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-1}{2}}frac{(-2n+2)(-2n+6)cdots (-2n+4j-2)}{(2j+1)!}x^{2j+1}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!bigg(x+frac{(-2n+2)(-2n+6)cdots (-4)}{n!}x^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(-2n+2)(-2n+6)cdots (-2n+4j-2)}{(2j+1)!}x^{2j+1}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!bigg(x+frac{(-4)^{frac{n-1}{2}}(frac{n-1}{2})!}{n!}x^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(-4)^j(frac{n-1}{2})!}{(2j+1)!(frac{n-2j-1}{2})!}x^{2j+1}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!x+2^nx^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{n!cdot(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}(-4)^{j}}{(2j+1)!left(frac{n-2j-1}{2}right)!cdot 2^{frac{n-1}{2}}}x^{2j+1}
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!x+2^nx^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquad+nsum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(n-2j-2)!binom{n-1}{2j+1}(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2cdot (-4)^{j}}{left(frac{n-2j-1}{2}right)!}x^{2j+1}
\\&=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^{n}+2n(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}sum_{j=color{red}{0}}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(n-2j-2)!}{left(frac{n-2j-1}{2}right)!}binom{n-1}{2j+1}(-4)^{j}x^{2j+1}
end{align}$$
So, there is a polynomial $g$ with integer coefficients such that
$$H_n(x)=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^n+(x^r-1)times 0+ng$$
Since $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$, we get $2^n-2equiv 0pmod n$.
It follows that $$H_n(x)equiv 2x^npmod{x^r-1,n}qquadblacksquare$$
The claim is not true.
It is not true that if $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$, then $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$.
Proof :
Let us consider the case where $n$ is an even number greater than $2$.
So, $n$ is neither a prime number nor Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$.
Using the following expression
$$H_{2k}=(-1)^k2^k(2k-1)!!left(1+sum_{j=1}^{k}frac{(-4k)(-4k+4)cdots (-4k+4j-4)}{(2j)!}x^{2j}right)$$
we have, using $(n-1)!!cdot 2^{frac n2}(frac n2)!=n!$,
$$begin{align}H_{n}&=(-1)^{frac n2}2^{frac n2}(n-1)!!left(1+sum_{j=1}^{frac n2}frac{(-2n)(-2n+4)cdots (-2n+4j-4)}{(2j)!}x^{2j}right)
\\&=(-1)^{frac n2}2^{frac n2}(n-1)!!bigg(1+frac{(-2n)(-2n+4)cdots (-4)}{n!}x^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac n2-1}frac{(-2n)(-2n+4)cdots (-2n+4j-4)}{(2j)!}x^{2j}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac n2}2^{frac n2}(n-1)!!bigg(1+frac{(-4)^{frac n2}(frac n2)!}{n!}x^{n}+sum_{j=1}^{frac n2-1}frac{(-4)^j(frac n2)!}{(frac{n-2j}{2})!(2j)!}x^{2j}bigg)
\\&=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^n+frac{(-1)^{frac n2}n!}{(frac n2)!}+n(-1)^{frac n2}sum_{j=1}^{frac n2-1}frac{(n-2j-1)!}{(frac{n-2j}{2})!}binom{n-1}{2j}(-4)^j
end{align}$$
So, there is a polynomial $f$ with integer coefficients such that
$$H_n(x)=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^n+(x^r-1)times 0+nf$$
Now, if $n$ is an even pseudoprime to base 2, then we get $2^n-2equiv 0pmod n$, so it follows that $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$.
Therefore, $n=161038$ is a counterexample.$qquadblacksquare$
It is true that if $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$, then $H_n(x) equiv 2x^n pmod {x^r-1,n}$.
Proof :
For $n=3$, we have
$$H_3(x)=2x^3+(x^r-1)times 0+3(2x^3-4x)equiv 0pmod {x^r-1,3}$$
In the following, $n$ is an odd number greater than $3$.
Using the following expression
$$H_{2k+1}(x)=(-1)^kcdot 2^{k+1}(2k+1)!!bigg(x+sum_{j=1}^{k}frac{(-4k)(-4k+4)cdots (-4k+4j-4)}{(2j+1)!}x^{2j+1}bigg)$$
we have, using $n!!cdot 2^{frac{n-1}{2}}(frac{n-1}{2})!=n!$,
$$begin{align}H_{n}(x)&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!bigg(x+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-1}{2}}frac{(-2n+2)(-2n+6)cdots (-2n+4j-2)}{(2j+1)!}x^{2j+1}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!bigg(x+frac{(-2n+2)(-2n+6)cdots (-4)}{n!}x^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(-2n+2)(-2n+6)cdots (-2n+4j-2)}{(2j+1)!}x^{2j+1}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!bigg(x+frac{(-4)^{frac{n-1}{2}}(frac{n-1}{2})!}{n!}x^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(-4)^j(frac{n-1}{2})!}{(2j+1)!(frac{n-2j-1}{2})!}x^{2j+1}bigg)
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!x+2^nx^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquad+sum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{n!cdot(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}(-4)^{j}}{(2j+1)!left(frac{n-2j-1}{2}right)!cdot 2^{frac{n-1}{2}}}x^{2j+1}
\\&=(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2^{frac{n+1}{2}}n!!x+2^nx^{n}
\&qquadqquadqquadqquad+nsum_{j=1}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(n-2j-2)!binom{n-1}{2j+1}(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}cdot 2cdot (-4)^{j}}{left(frac{n-2j-1}{2}right)!}x^{2j+1}
\\&=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^{n}+2n(-1)^{frac{n-1}{2}}sum_{j=color{red}{0}}^{frac{n-3}{2}}frac{(n-2j-2)!}{left(frac{n-2j-1}{2}right)!}binom{n-1}{2j+1}(-4)^{j}x^{2j+1}
end{align}$$
So, there is a polynomial $g$ with integer coefficients such that
$$H_n(x)=2x^n+(2^n-2)x^n+(x^r-1)times 0+ng$$
Since $n$ is either a prime number or Fermat pseudoprime to base $2$, we get $2^n-2equiv 0pmod n$.
It follows that $$H_n(x)equiv 2x^npmod{x^r-1,n}qquadblacksquare$$
answered Nov 17 at 15:35
mathlove
91.6k881214
91.6k881214
Thank you for the clarification, I really appreciate it.
– Peđa Terzić
Nov 17 at 16:33
add a comment |
Thank you for the clarification, I really appreciate it.
– Peđa Terzić
Nov 17 at 16:33
Thank you for the clarification, I really appreciate it.
– Peđa Terzić
Nov 17 at 16:33
Thank you for the clarification, I really appreciate it.
– Peđa Terzić
Nov 17 at 16:33
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Please let me know if this is way off base.
We know $rnot|n$ and $n^{2} not equiv 1 mod r$. Therefore, from the latter part of the statement we know $rnot| n^{2}-1$ which is equivalent to $rnot |(n-1)$ and $rnot|(n+1)$. So for any $n$ we have two cases. The first being $n-1$ is odd, $n$ is even, and $n+1$ is odd. The second being $n-1$ is even, $n$ is odd, and $n+1$ is even. Since in both circumstances we have an even integer we know $nnot = 2$. Because we have three consecutive integers, that are greater than 2, we must have at least one that is divisible by $3$.
So the fact that we cannot have $3$, but you state that $n$ is a prime number greater than $2$ or pseudo-prime to base $2$ (smallest is $341$?) makes your proof invalid due to a contradiction in your consequent.
Once again, sorry if I am not understanding something.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Please let me know if this is way off base.
We know $rnot|n$ and $n^{2} not equiv 1 mod r$. Therefore, from the latter part of the statement we know $rnot| n^{2}-1$ which is equivalent to $rnot |(n-1)$ and $rnot|(n+1)$. So for any $n$ we have two cases. The first being $n-1$ is odd, $n$ is even, and $n+1$ is odd. The second being $n-1$ is even, $n$ is odd, and $n+1$ is even. Since in both circumstances we have an even integer we know $nnot = 2$. Because we have three consecutive integers, that are greater than 2, we must have at least one that is divisible by $3$.
So the fact that we cannot have $3$, but you state that $n$ is a prime number greater than $2$ or pseudo-prime to base $2$ (smallest is $341$?) makes your proof invalid due to a contradiction in your consequent.
Once again, sorry if I am not understanding something.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Please let me know if this is way off base.
We know $rnot|n$ and $n^{2} not equiv 1 mod r$. Therefore, from the latter part of the statement we know $rnot| n^{2}-1$ which is equivalent to $rnot |(n-1)$ and $rnot|(n+1)$. So for any $n$ we have two cases. The first being $n-1$ is odd, $n$ is even, and $n+1$ is odd. The second being $n-1$ is even, $n$ is odd, and $n+1$ is even. Since in both circumstances we have an even integer we know $nnot = 2$. Because we have three consecutive integers, that are greater than 2, we must have at least one that is divisible by $3$.
So the fact that we cannot have $3$, but you state that $n$ is a prime number greater than $2$ or pseudo-prime to base $2$ (smallest is $341$?) makes your proof invalid due to a contradiction in your consequent.
Once again, sorry if I am not understanding something.
New contributor
Please let me know if this is way off base.
We know $rnot|n$ and $n^{2} not equiv 1 mod r$. Therefore, from the latter part of the statement we know $rnot| n^{2}-1$ which is equivalent to $rnot |(n-1)$ and $rnot|(n+1)$. So for any $n$ we have two cases. The first being $n-1$ is odd, $n$ is even, and $n+1$ is odd. The second being $n-1$ is even, $n$ is odd, and $n+1$ is even. Since in both circumstances we have an even integer we know $nnot = 2$. Because we have three consecutive integers, that are greater than 2, we must have at least one that is divisible by $3$.
So the fact that we cannot have $3$, but you state that $n$ is a prime number greater than $2$ or pseudo-prime to base $2$ (smallest is $341$?) makes your proof invalid due to a contradiction in your consequent.
Once again, sorry if I am not understanding something.
New contributor
New contributor
answered Nov 24 at 7:36
multicusp
211
211
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2927462%2fhermite-polynomials-and-primality-testing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown