Increasing the size of a symbol “|”
I'm using LyX, and I'm trying to create a large |
, as shown in the following image:
If I'll use:
G=left{ begin{pmatrix}t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix}|tinmathbb{R}^{times}right}
I would get:
Is it possible to make the |
symbol larger without using any external modules?
lyx
add a comment |
I'm using LyX, and I'm trying to create a large |
, as shown in the following image:
If I'll use:
G=left{ begin{pmatrix}t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix}|tinmathbb{R}^{times}right}
I would get:
Is it possible to make the |
symbol larger without using any external modules?
lyx
This question reminds me of something similar: was it, perhaps, this question?
– GuM
Dec 19 '18 at 21:51
add a comment |
I'm using LyX, and I'm trying to create a large |
, as shown in the following image:
If I'll use:
G=left{ begin{pmatrix}t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix}|tinmathbb{R}^{times}right}
I would get:
Is it possible to make the |
symbol larger without using any external modules?
lyx
I'm using LyX, and I'm trying to create a large |
, as shown in the following image:
If I'll use:
G=left{ begin{pmatrix}t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix}|tinmathbb{R}^{times}right}
I would get:
Is it possible to make the |
symbol larger without using any external modules?
lyx
lyx
edited Dec 19 '18 at 20:22
Sebastiano
9,10041756
9,10041756
asked Dec 19 '18 at 20:04
vesii
535
535
This question reminds me of something similar: was it, perhaps, this question?
– GuM
Dec 19 '18 at 21:51
add a comment |
This question reminds me of something similar: was it, perhaps, this question?
– GuM
Dec 19 '18 at 21:51
This question reminds me of something similar: was it, perhaps, this question?
– GuM
Dec 19 '18 at 21:51
This question reminds me of something similar: was it, perhaps, this question?
– GuM
Dec 19 '18 at 21:51
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
You can use middle|
, and you have to add some horizontal spacing on the right and on the left.
Even if you don't want to use external package modules, I suggest using the DeclarePairedDelimiter
from mathtools
(which is just an extension of amsmath
, which takes care of all the spacing problems, and loading xparse
to simplify the syntax (both arguments are separated by a ;
). Here is a code for each solution:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse, mathtools, amsfonts}
DeclarePairedDelimiterX{set}[1]{}{setargs{#1}}
NewDocumentCommand{setargs}{>{SplitArgument{1}{;}}m}
{setargsaux#1}
NewDocumentCommand{setargsaux}{mm}
{IfNoValueTF{#2}{#1}{nonscript,#1nonscript;delimsizevertnonscript:allowbreak #2nonscript,}}
begin{document}
[ G=left{ begin{pmatrix}t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix},middle|, tinmathbb{R}^{times}right} ]
bigskip
[ G=set*{ begin{pmatrix}t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix} ; tinmathbb{R}^{times}} ]
end{document}
add a comment |
First off, I would use inline-fraction notation, 1/t
, instead of frac{1}{t}
in order to typeset the matrix more compactly. If you're OK with using psmallmatrix
instead of pmatrix
, you can then get by with bigl(
, bigm|
(or bigmvert
), and bigr)
. If you prefer using pmatrix
, use biggl(
, biggm|
, and biggr)
instead.
Observe that biggm|
automatically adds the typographically required amount of whitespace around the vertical bar. This is in contrast to bigg|
, wwhere no whitespace is inserted.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'psmallmatrix' env.
usepackage{amssymb} % for 'mathbb' macro
begin{document}
begin{align*}
G&=bigl{
begin{psmallmatrix} t & 0\ 0 & 1/t end{psmallmatrix}
bigm|
tinmathbb{R}^{times}
bigr} \
&=biggl{
begin{pmatrix} t & 0\ 0 & 1/t end{pmatrix}
biggm|
tinmathbb{R}^{times}
biggr}
end{align*}
end{document}
add a comment |
I don't think this is a Lyx-specific issue. Does this work for you?
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$
G=left{
left. %ADDED (as a blank bracket)
begin{pmatrix}
t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix}
right| %ADDED (as expandable bracket)
tinmathbb{R}^{times}right}
$
end{document}
The way this works is be wrapping another set of brackets around the pmatrix
environment. The first one is empty (left.
) while the you replace the current |
as the companion right bracket (right|
). This allows it to match the height automatically.
add a comment |
For to increase simply the |
symbol an alternative might be to use the commands biggvert
, or Biggvert
. See the my MWE with the picture.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools,amssymb}
begin{document}
[
G=Biggl{ begin{pmatrix} t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix} biggvert
,tinmathbb{R}^{times}Biggr}
]
end{document}
2nd example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools,amssymb}
begin{document}
[
G=Biggl{ begin{pmatrix} t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix} Biggvert
,tinmathbb{R}^{times}Biggr}
]
end{document}
1
If you writeBiggmvert
instead ofBiggvert
, one needn't engage in visual formatting by inserting a,
instruction.
– Mico
Dec 19 '18 at 21:22
@Mico Thank you very much for your comment. I saw your answer that I appreciated so much. I absolutely did not know of the existence ofbiggm
.
– Sebastiano
Dec 19 '18 at 21:30
add a comment |
I'm not sure if an array
is OK to use or not, but this is simple.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts}
begin{document}
[
G=left{begin{array}{@{}c|c@{}}
begin{pmatrix} t & 0\ 0 & frac1t end{pmatrix} & tinmathbb{R}^times
end{array}right}
]
end{document}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466594%2fincreasing-the-size-of-a-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can use middle|
, and you have to add some horizontal spacing on the right and on the left.
Even if you don't want to use external package modules, I suggest using the DeclarePairedDelimiter
from mathtools
(which is just an extension of amsmath
, which takes care of all the spacing problems, and loading xparse
to simplify the syntax (both arguments are separated by a ;
). Here is a code for each solution:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse, mathtools, amsfonts}
DeclarePairedDelimiterX{set}[1]{}{setargs{#1}}
NewDocumentCommand{setargs}{>{SplitArgument{1}{;}}m}
{setargsaux#1}
NewDocumentCommand{setargsaux}{mm}
{IfNoValueTF{#2}{#1}{nonscript,#1nonscript;delimsizevertnonscript:allowbreak #2nonscript,}}
begin{document}
[ G=left{ begin{pmatrix}t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix},middle|, tinmathbb{R}^{times}right} ]
bigskip
[ G=set*{ begin{pmatrix}t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix} ; tinmathbb{R}^{times}} ]
end{document}
add a comment |
You can use middle|
, and you have to add some horizontal spacing on the right and on the left.
Even if you don't want to use external package modules, I suggest using the DeclarePairedDelimiter
from mathtools
(which is just an extension of amsmath
, which takes care of all the spacing problems, and loading xparse
to simplify the syntax (both arguments are separated by a ;
). Here is a code for each solution:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse, mathtools, amsfonts}
DeclarePairedDelimiterX{set}[1]{}{setargs{#1}}
NewDocumentCommand{setargs}{>{SplitArgument{1}{;}}m}
{setargsaux#1}
NewDocumentCommand{setargsaux}{mm}
{IfNoValueTF{#2}{#1}{nonscript,#1nonscript;delimsizevertnonscript:allowbreak #2nonscript,}}
begin{document}
[ G=left{ begin{pmatrix}t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix},middle|, tinmathbb{R}^{times}right} ]
bigskip
[ G=set*{ begin{pmatrix}t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix} ; tinmathbb{R}^{times}} ]
end{document}
add a comment |
You can use middle|
, and you have to add some horizontal spacing on the right and on the left.
Even if you don't want to use external package modules, I suggest using the DeclarePairedDelimiter
from mathtools
(which is just an extension of amsmath
, which takes care of all the spacing problems, and loading xparse
to simplify the syntax (both arguments are separated by a ;
). Here is a code for each solution:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse, mathtools, amsfonts}
DeclarePairedDelimiterX{set}[1]{}{setargs{#1}}
NewDocumentCommand{setargs}{>{SplitArgument{1}{;}}m}
{setargsaux#1}
NewDocumentCommand{setargsaux}{mm}
{IfNoValueTF{#2}{#1}{nonscript,#1nonscript;delimsizevertnonscript:allowbreak #2nonscript,}}
begin{document}
[ G=left{ begin{pmatrix}t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix},middle|, tinmathbb{R}^{times}right} ]
bigskip
[ G=set*{ begin{pmatrix}t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix} ; tinmathbb{R}^{times}} ]
end{document}
You can use middle|
, and you have to add some horizontal spacing on the right and on the left.
Even if you don't want to use external package modules, I suggest using the DeclarePairedDelimiter
from mathtools
(which is just an extension of amsmath
, which takes care of all the spacing problems, and loading xparse
to simplify the syntax (both arguments are separated by a ;
). Here is a code for each solution:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse, mathtools, amsfonts}
DeclarePairedDelimiterX{set}[1]{}{setargs{#1}}
NewDocumentCommand{setargs}{>{SplitArgument{1}{;}}m}
{setargsaux#1}
NewDocumentCommand{setargsaux}{mm}
{IfNoValueTF{#2}{#1}{nonscript,#1nonscript;delimsizevertnonscript:allowbreak #2nonscript,}}
begin{document}
[ G=left{ begin{pmatrix}t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix},middle|, tinmathbb{R}^{times}right} ]
bigskip
[ G=set*{ begin{pmatrix}t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix} ; tinmathbb{R}^{times}} ]
end{document}
edited Dec 19 '18 at 20:39
answered Dec 19 '18 at 20:26
Bernard
166k769194
166k769194
add a comment |
add a comment |
First off, I would use inline-fraction notation, 1/t
, instead of frac{1}{t}
in order to typeset the matrix more compactly. If you're OK with using psmallmatrix
instead of pmatrix
, you can then get by with bigl(
, bigm|
(or bigmvert
), and bigr)
. If you prefer using pmatrix
, use biggl(
, biggm|
, and biggr)
instead.
Observe that biggm|
automatically adds the typographically required amount of whitespace around the vertical bar. This is in contrast to bigg|
, wwhere no whitespace is inserted.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'psmallmatrix' env.
usepackage{amssymb} % for 'mathbb' macro
begin{document}
begin{align*}
G&=bigl{
begin{psmallmatrix} t & 0\ 0 & 1/t end{psmallmatrix}
bigm|
tinmathbb{R}^{times}
bigr} \
&=biggl{
begin{pmatrix} t & 0\ 0 & 1/t end{pmatrix}
biggm|
tinmathbb{R}^{times}
biggr}
end{align*}
end{document}
add a comment |
First off, I would use inline-fraction notation, 1/t
, instead of frac{1}{t}
in order to typeset the matrix more compactly. If you're OK with using psmallmatrix
instead of pmatrix
, you can then get by with bigl(
, bigm|
(or bigmvert
), and bigr)
. If you prefer using pmatrix
, use biggl(
, biggm|
, and biggr)
instead.
Observe that biggm|
automatically adds the typographically required amount of whitespace around the vertical bar. This is in contrast to bigg|
, wwhere no whitespace is inserted.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'psmallmatrix' env.
usepackage{amssymb} % for 'mathbb' macro
begin{document}
begin{align*}
G&=bigl{
begin{psmallmatrix} t & 0\ 0 & 1/t end{psmallmatrix}
bigm|
tinmathbb{R}^{times}
bigr} \
&=biggl{
begin{pmatrix} t & 0\ 0 & 1/t end{pmatrix}
biggm|
tinmathbb{R}^{times}
biggr}
end{align*}
end{document}
add a comment |
First off, I would use inline-fraction notation, 1/t
, instead of frac{1}{t}
in order to typeset the matrix more compactly. If you're OK with using psmallmatrix
instead of pmatrix
, you can then get by with bigl(
, bigm|
(or bigmvert
), and bigr)
. If you prefer using pmatrix
, use biggl(
, biggm|
, and biggr)
instead.
Observe that biggm|
automatically adds the typographically required amount of whitespace around the vertical bar. This is in contrast to bigg|
, wwhere no whitespace is inserted.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'psmallmatrix' env.
usepackage{amssymb} % for 'mathbb' macro
begin{document}
begin{align*}
G&=bigl{
begin{psmallmatrix} t & 0\ 0 & 1/t end{psmallmatrix}
bigm|
tinmathbb{R}^{times}
bigr} \
&=biggl{
begin{pmatrix} t & 0\ 0 & 1/t end{pmatrix}
biggm|
tinmathbb{R}^{times}
biggr}
end{align*}
end{document}
First off, I would use inline-fraction notation, 1/t
, instead of frac{1}{t}
in order to typeset the matrix more compactly. If you're OK with using psmallmatrix
instead of pmatrix
, you can then get by with bigl(
, bigm|
(or bigmvert
), and bigr)
. If you prefer using pmatrix
, use biggl(
, biggm|
, and biggr)
instead.
Observe that biggm|
automatically adds the typographically required amount of whitespace around the vertical bar. This is in contrast to bigg|
, wwhere no whitespace is inserted.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'psmallmatrix' env.
usepackage{amssymb} % for 'mathbb' macro
begin{document}
begin{align*}
G&=bigl{
begin{psmallmatrix} t & 0\ 0 & 1/t end{psmallmatrix}
bigm|
tinmathbb{R}^{times}
bigr} \
&=biggl{
begin{pmatrix} t & 0\ 0 & 1/t end{pmatrix}
biggm|
tinmathbb{R}^{times}
biggr}
end{align*}
end{document}
answered Dec 19 '18 at 21:20
Mico
274k30370756
274k30370756
add a comment |
add a comment |
I don't think this is a Lyx-specific issue. Does this work for you?
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$
G=left{
left. %ADDED (as a blank bracket)
begin{pmatrix}
t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix}
right| %ADDED (as expandable bracket)
tinmathbb{R}^{times}right}
$
end{document}
The way this works is be wrapping another set of brackets around the pmatrix
environment. The first one is empty (left.
) while the you replace the current |
as the companion right bracket (right|
). This allows it to match the height automatically.
add a comment |
I don't think this is a Lyx-specific issue. Does this work for you?
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$
G=left{
left. %ADDED (as a blank bracket)
begin{pmatrix}
t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix}
right| %ADDED (as expandable bracket)
tinmathbb{R}^{times}right}
$
end{document}
The way this works is be wrapping another set of brackets around the pmatrix
environment. The first one is empty (left.
) while the you replace the current |
as the companion right bracket (right|
). This allows it to match the height automatically.
add a comment |
I don't think this is a Lyx-specific issue. Does this work for you?
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$
G=left{
left. %ADDED (as a blank bracket)
begin{pmatrix}
t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix}
right| %ADDED (as expandable bracket)
tinmathbb{R}^{times}right}
$
end{document}
The way this works is be wrapping another set of brackets around the pmatrix
environment. The first one is empty (left.
) while the you replace the current |
as the companion right bracket (right|
). This allows it to match the height automatically.
I don't think this is a Lyx-specific issue. Does this work for you?
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$
G=left{
left. %ADDED (as a blank bracket)
begin{pmatrix}
t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix}
right| %ADDED (as expandable bracket)
tinmathbb{R}^{times}right}
$
end{document}
The way this works is be wrapping another set of brackets around the pmatrix
environment. The first one is empty (left.
) while the you replace the current |
as the companion right bracket (right|
). This allows it to match the height automatically.
edited Dec 19 '18 at 20:26
answered Dec 19 '18 at 20:14
whatisit
887313
887313
add a comment |
add a comment |
For to increase simply the |
symbol an alternative might be to use the commands biggvert
, or Biggvert
. See the my MWE with the picture.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools,amssymb}
begin{document}
[
G=Biggl{ begin{pmatrix} t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix} biggvert
,tinmathbb{R}^{times}Biggr}
]
end{document}
2nd example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools,amssymb}
begin{document}
[
G=Biggl{ begin{pmatrix} t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix} Biggvert
,tinmathbb{R}^{times}Biggr}
]
end{document}
1
If you writeBiggmvert
instead ofBiggvert
, one needn't engage in visual formatting by inserting a,
instruction.
– Mico
Dec 19 '18 at 21:22
@Mico Thank you very much for your comment. I saw your answer that I appreciated so much. I absolutely did not know of the existence ofbiggm
.
– Sebastiano
Dec 19 '18 at 21:30
add a comment |
For to increase simply the |
symbol an alternative might be to use the commands biggvert
, or Biggvert
. See the my MWE with the picture.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools,amssymb}
begin{document}
[
G=Biggl{ begin{pmatrix} t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix} biggvert
,tinmathbb{R}^{times}Biggr}
]
end{document}
2nd example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools,amssymb}
begin{document}
[
G=Biggl{ begin{pmatrix} t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix} Biggvert
,tinmathbb{R}^{times}Biggr}
]
end{document}
1
If you writeBiggmvert
instead ofBiggvert
, one needn't engage in visual formatting by inserting a,
instruction.
– Mico
Dec 19 '18 at 21:22
@Mico Thank you very much for your comment. I saw your answer that I appreciated so much. I absolutely did not know of the existence ofbiggm
.
– Sebastiano
Dec 19 '18 at 21:30
add a comment |
For to increase simply the |
symbol an alternative might be to use the commands biggvert
, or Biggvert
. See the my MWE with the picture.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools,amssymb}
begin{document}
[
G=Biggl{ begin{pmatrix} t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix} biggvert
,tinmathbb{R}^{times}Biggr}
]
end{document}
2nd example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools,amssymb}
begin{document}
[
G=Biggl{ begin{pmatrix} t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix} Biggvert
,tinmathbb{R}^{times}Biggr}
]
end{document}
For to increase simply the |
symbol an alternative might be to use the commands biggvert
, or Biggvert
. See the my MWE with the picture.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools,amssymb}
begin{document}
[
G=Biggl{ begin{pmatrix} t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix} biggvert
,tinmathbb{R}^{times}Biggr}
]
end{document}
2nd example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools,amssymb}
begin{document}
[
G=Biggl{ begin{pmatrix} t & 0\
0 & frac{1}{t}
end{pmatrix} Biggvert
,tinmathbb{R}^{times}Biggr}
]
end{document}
edited Dec 19 '18 at 21:05
answered Dec 19 '18 at 20:31
Sebastiano
9,10041756
9,10041756
1
If you writeBiggmvert
instead ofBiggvert
, one needn't engage in visual formatting by inserting a,
instruction.
– Mico
Dec 19 '18 at 21:22
@Mico Thank you very much for your comment. I saw your answer that I appreciated so much. I absolutely did not know of the existence ofbiggm
.
– Sebastiano
Dec 19 '18 at 21:30
add a comment |
1
If you writeBiggmvert
instead ofBiggvert
, one needn't engage in visual formatting by inserting a,
instruction.
– Mico
Dec 19 '18 at 21:22
@Mico Thank you very much for your comment. I saw your answer that I appreciated so much. I absolutely did not know of the existence ofbiggm
.
– Sebastiano
Dec 19 '18 at 21:30
1
1
If you write
Biggmvert
instead of Biggvert
, one needn't engage in visual formatting by inserting a ,
instruction.– Mico
Dec 19 '18 at 21:22
If you write
Biggmvert
instead of Biggvert
, one needn't engage in visual formatting by inserting a ,
instruction.– Mico
Dec 19 '18 at 21:22
@Mico Thank you very much for your comment. I saw your answer that I appreciated so much. I absolutely did not know of the existence of
biggm
.– Sebastiano
Dec 19 '18 at 21:30
@Mico Thank you very much for your comment. I saw your answer that I appreciated so much. I absolutely did not know of the existence of
biggm
.– Sebastiano
Dec 19 '18 at 21:30
add a comment |
I'm not sure if an array
is OK to use or not, but this is simple.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts}
begin{document}
[
G=left{begin{array}{@{}c|c@{}}
begin{pmatrix} t & 0\ 0 & frac1t end{pmatrix} & tinmathbb{R}^times
end{array}right}
]
end{document}
add a comment |
I'm not sure if an array
is OK to use or not, but this is simple.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts}
begin{document}
[
G=left{begin{array}{@{}c|c@{}}
begin{pmatrix} t & 0\ 0 & frac1t end{pmatrix} & tinmathbb{R}^times
end{array}right}
]
end{document}
add a comment |
I'm not sure if an array
is OK to use or not, but this is simple.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts}
begin{document}
[
G=left{begin{array}{@{}c|c@{}}
begin{pmatrix} t & 0\ 0 & frac1t end{pmatrix} & tinmathbb{R}^times
end{array}right}
]
end{document}
I'm not sure if an array
is OK to use or not, but this is simple.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts}
begin{document}
[
G=left{begin{array}{@{}c|c@{}}
begin{pmatrix} t & 0\ 0 & frac1t end{pmatrix} & tinmathbb{R}^times
end{array}right}
]
end{document}
answered Dec 20 '18 at 12:29
AboAmmar
33.2k22882
33.2k22882
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466594%2fincreasing-the-size-of-a-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
This question reminds me of something similar: was it, perhaps, this question?
– GuM
Dec 19 '18 at 21:51