proving that $mathbb{E}[X] = int_{0}^{infty}mathbb{P}(X geq t) dt$ in the case of non-negative random...











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












say we're in a probability space $(Omega, Sigma, mathbb{P})$ and $X : (Omega, Sigma) to (mathbb{R}, mathscr{B}_{mathbb{R}})$ is random variable



I resulted in the right result but I feel like the math is bad, please check it :



$$begin{align} & int_{0}^{infty}mathbb{P}(X geq t) dt = int_0^{infty}int_{X geq t}dmathbb{P},dt ,,,,\
= & int_{X geq 0}int_{0}^{X}dt,dmathbb{P} ,,(star) = int_{X geq 0}X,dmathbb{P} \
= & int_{Omega}X,dmathbb{P} ,,,, text{due to non-negativity} = mathbb{E}[X]
end{align}$$



where I'm not sure I'm doing legal stuff is $(star)$, I used Fubini-Tonelli theorem to change order of integration, but when I changed bounds of integration I reasoned the following way :



we have : $tgeq 0$ and $Xgeq t$ meaning on the one hand we have $X geq 0$ and $ 0 leq t leq X $



am I doing this right ?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Looks fine to me.
    – drhab
    Nov 16 at 14:17















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












say we're in a probability space $(Omega, Sigma, mathbb{P})$ and $X : (Omega, Sigma) to (mathbb{R}, mathscr{B}_{mathbb{R}})$ is random variable



I resulted in the right result but I feel like the math is bad, please check it :



$$begin{align} & int_{0}^{infty}mathbb{P}(X geq t) dt = int_0^{infty}int_{X geq t}dmathbb{P},dt ,,,,\
= & int_{X geq 0}int_{0}^{X}dt,dmathbb{P} ,,(star) = int_{X geq 0}X,dmathbb{P} \
= & int_{Omega}X,dmathbb{P} ,,,, text{due to non-negativity} = mathbb{E}[X]
end{align}$$



where I'm not sure I'm doing legal stuff is $(star)$, I used Fubini-Tonelli theorem to change order of integration, but when I changed bounds of integration I reasoned the following way :



we have : $tgeq 0$ and $Xgeq t$ meaning on the one hand we have $X geq 0$ and $ 0 leq t leq X $



am I doing this right ?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Looks fine to me.
    – drhab
    Nov 16 at 14:17













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











say we're in a probability space $(Omega, Sigma, mathbb{P})$ and $X : (Omega, Sigma) to (mathbb{R}, mathscr{B}_{mathbb{R}})$ is random variable



I resulted in the right result but I feel like the math is bad, please check it :



$$begin{align} & int_{0}^{infty}mathbb{P}(X geq t) dt = int_0^{infty}int_{X geq t}dmathbb{P},dt ,,,,\
= & int_{X geq 0}int_{0}^{X}dt,dmathbb{P} ,,(star) = int_{X geq 0}X,dmathbb{P} \
= & int_{Omega}X,dmathbb{P} ,,,, text{due to non-negativity} = mathbb{E}[X]
end{align}$$



where I'm not sure I'm doing legal stuff is $(star)$, I used Fubini-Tonelli theorem to change order of integration, but when I changed bounds of integration I reasoned the following way :



we have : $tgeq 0$ and $Xgeq t$ meaning on the one hand we have $X geq 0$ and $ 0 leq t leq X $



am I doing this right ?










share|cite|improve this question













say we're in a probability space $(Omega, Sigma, mathbb{P})$ and $X : (Omega, Sigma) to (mathbb{R}, mathscr{B}_{mathbb{R}})$ is random variable



I resulted in the right result but I feel like the math is bad, please check it :



$$begin{align} & int_{0}^{infty}mathbb{P}(X geq t) dt = int_0^{infty}int_{X geq t}dmathbb{P},dt ,,,,\
= & int_{X geq 0}int_{0}^{X}dt,dmathbb{P} ,,(star) = int_{X geq 0}X,dmathbb{P} \
= & int_{Omega}X,dmathbb{P} ,,,, text{due to non-negativity} = mathbb{E}[X]
end{align}$$



where I'm not sure I'm doing legal stuff is $(star)$, I used Fubini-Tonelli theorem to change order of integration, but when I changed bounds of integration I reasoned the following way :



we have : $tgeq 0$ and $Xgeq t$ meaning on the one hand we have $X geq 0$ and $ 0 leq t leq X $



am I doing this right ?







probability probability-theory proof-verification expected-value






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 16 at 12:57









rapidracim

1,3271319




1,3271319








  • 1




    Looks fine to me.
    – drhab
    Nov 16 at 14:17














  • 1




    Looks fine to me.
    – drhab
    Nov 16 at 14:17








1




1




Looks fine to me.
– drhab
Nov 16 at 14:17




Looks fine to me.
– drhab
Nov 16 at 14:17










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










The integral before $(star)$ can be written as $int_Omegaint_{mathbb R}f(t,omega)mathrm dtmathrm dP(omega)$, where $f(t,omega)=1$ if $X(omega)geqslant t$ and $0$ otherwise. Then Fubini's theorem can be used in this setting.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001111%2fproving-that-mathbbex-int-0-infty-mathbbpx-geq-t-dt-in-the-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    The integral before $(star)$ can be written as $int_Omegaint_{mathbb R}f(t,omega)mathrm dtmathrm dP(omega)$, where $f(t,omega)=1$ if $X(omega)geqslant t$ and $0$ otherwise. Then Fubini's theorem can be used in this setting.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      The integral before $(star)$ can be written as $int_Omegaint_{mathbb R}f(t,omega)mathrm dtmathrm dP(omega)$, where $f(t,omega)=1$ if $X(omega)geqslant t$ and $0$ otherwise. Then Fubini's theorem can be used in this setting.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        The integral before $(star)$ can be written as $int_Omegaint_{mathbb R}f(t,omega)mathrm dtmathrm dP(omega)$, where $f(t,omega)=1$ if $X(omega)geqslant t$ and $0$ otherwise. Then Fubini's theorem can be used in this setting.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        The integral before $(star)$ can be written as $int_Omegaint_{mathbb R}f(t,omega)mathrm dtmathrm dP(omega)$, where $f(t,omega)=1$ if $X(omega)geqslant t$ and $0$ otherwise. Then Fubini's theorem can be used in this setting.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 16 at 15:27









        Davide Giraudo

        124k16149254




        124k16149254






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001111%2fproving-that-mathbbex-int-0-infty-mathbbpx-geq-t-dt-in-the-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

            Grease: Live!

            When does type information flow backwards in C++?