Show that the function $f$ is strictly bounded by an arbitrary number $A$












2












$begingroup$



Suppose the function $f(x)$ is differentiable on $[a,b]$ and there exists an arbitrary number $A$ such that for all $x in (a,b)$
$$f(a)<A$$
$$f(x)+f'(x)<A$$
Show that $f(x)<A$ for all $x in (a,b)$.




My attempt: Generate a function $h(x)$ such that
$$h(x)=e^xf(x)$$
$$Longrightarrow h'(x)=[e^xf(x)]'=e^x[f(x)+f'(x)]<e^xA$$
So $h'(x)$ is strictly bounded by $e^xA$. By MVT, there exists two points $c,d in (a,b)$ such that
$$h(c)-h(d)=h'(frac{c+d}{2})(c-d)$$
$$e^cf(c)<Ae^{frac{c+d}{2}}(c-d)+Ae^d$$
$$f(c)<Ae^{frac{d-c}{2}}(c-d)+Ae^{d-c}=Ae^{d-c}[e^{frac{1}{2}}(c-d)+1]$$
It seems my proof is wrong and get discontinued when I focus on simplifying for $f(c)$ but the question requires that $f(x)$ is strictly bounded by $A$ for the interval $I=(a,b)$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$



    Suppose the function $f(x)$ is differentiable on $[a,b]$ and there exists an arbitrary number $A$ such that for all $x in (a,b)$
    $$f(a)<A$$
    $$f(x)+f'(x)<A$$
    Show that $f(x)<A$ for all $x in (a,b)$.




    My attempt: Generate a function $h(x)$ such that
    $$h(x)=e^xf(x)$$
    $$Longrightarrow h'(x)=[e^xf(x)]'=e^x[f(x)+f'(x)]<e^xA$$
    So $h'(x)$ is strictly bounded by $e^xA$. By MVT, there exists two points $c,d in (a,b)$ such that
    $$h(c)-h(d)=h'(frac{c+d}{2})(c-d)$$
    $$e^cf(c)<Ae^{frac{c+d}{2}}(c-d)+Ae^d$$
    $$f(c)<Ae^{frac{d-c}{2}}(c-d)+Ae^{d-c}=Ae^{d-c}[e^{frac{1}{2}}(c-d)+1]$$
    It seems my proof is wrong and get discontinued when I focus on simplifying for $f(c)$ but the question requires that $f(x)$ is strictly bounded by $A$ for the interval $I=(a,b)$.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$



      Suppose the function $f(x)$ is differentiable on $[a,b]$ and there exists an arbitrary number $A$ such that for all $x in (a,b)$
      $$f(a)<A$$
      $$f(x)+f'(x)<A$$
      Show that $f(x)<A$ for all $x in (a,b)$.




      My attempt: Generate a function $h(x)$ such that
      $$h(x)=e^xf(x)$$
      $$Longrightarrow h'(x)=[e^xf(x)]'=e^x[f(x)+f'(x)]<e^xA$$
      So $h'(x)$ is strictly bounded by $e^xA$. By MVT, there exists two points $c,d in (a,b)$ such that
      $$h(c)-h(d)=h'(frac{c+d}{2})(c-d)$$
      $$e^cf(c)<Ae^{frac{c+d}{2}}(c-d)+Ae^d$$
      $$f(c)<Ae^{frac{d-c}{2}}(c-d)+Ae^{d-c}=Ae^{d-c}[e^{frac{1}{2}}(c-d)+1]$$
      It seems my proof is wrong and get discontinued when I focus on simplifying for $f(c)$ but the question requires that $f(x)$ is strictly bounded by $A$ for the interval $I=(a,b)$.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      Suppose the function $f(x)$ is differentiable on $[a,b]$ and there exists an arbitrary number $A$ such that for all $x in (a,b)$
      $$f(a)<A$$
      $$f(x)+f'(x)<A$$
      Show that $f(x)<A$ for all $x in (a,b)$.




      My attempt: Generate a function $h(x)$ such that
      $$h(x)=e^xf(x)$$
      $$Longrightarrow h'(x)=[e^xf(x)]'=e^x[f(x)+f'(x)]<e^xA$$
      So $h'(x)$ is strictly bounded by $e^xA$. By MVT, there exists two points $c,d in (a,b)$ such that
      $$h(c)-h(d)=h'(frac{c+d}{2})(c-d)$$
      $$e^cf(c)<Ae^{frac{c+d}{2}}(c-d)+Ae^d$$
      $$f(c)<Ae^{frac{d-c}{2}}(c-d)+Ae^{d-c}=Ae^{d-c}[e^{frac{1}{2}}(c-d)+1]$$
      It seems my proof is wrong and get discontinued when I focus on simplifying for $f(c)$ but the question requires that $f(x)$ is strictly bounded by $A$ for the interval $I=(a,b)$.







      real-analysis derivatives






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 20 '18 at 9:00







      weilam06

















      asked Dec 20 '18 at 7:11









      weilam06weilam06

      30412




      30412






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I don't see what you are bringing $c$ and $d$ into it. Let $cin(a,b)$.
          Then
          $$h(c)-h(a)=int_a^c h'(t),dt
          <Aint_{a}^c e^t,dt=Ae^c-Ae^a.$$

          Then
          $$h(c)<Ae^c-Ae^a+h(a)<Ae^c.$$
          Then $f(c)<A$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            my only worry here is given our definitions in the post $h$ might be defined at $a$?
            $endgroup$
            – user136920
            Dec 20 '18 at 7:42













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047252%2fshow-that-the-function-f-is-strictly-bounded-by-an-arbitrary-number-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          I don't see what you are bringing $c$ and $d$ into it. Let $cin(a,b)$.
          Then
          $$h(c)-h(a)=int_a^c h'(t),dt
          <Aint_{a}^c e^t,dt=Ae^c-Ae^a.$$

          Then
          $$h(c)<Ae^c-Ae^a+h(a)<Ae^c.$$
          Then $f(c)<A$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            my only worry here is given our definitions in the post $h$ might be defined at $a$?
            $endgroup$
            – user136920
            Dec 20 '18 at 7:42


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I don't see what you are bringing $c$ and $d$ into it. Let $cin(a,b)$.
          Then
          $$h(c)-h(a)=int_a^c h'(t),dt
          <Aint_{a}^c e^t,dt=Ae^c-Ae^a.$$

          Then
          $$h(c)<Ae^c-Ae^a+h(a)<Ae^c.$$
          Then $f(c)<A$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            my only worry here is given our definitions in the post $h$ might be defined at $a$?
            $endgroup$
            – user136920
            Dec 20 '18 at 7:42
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          I don't see what you are bringing $c$ and $d$ into it. Let $cin(a,b)$.
          Then
          $$h(c)-h(a)=int_a^c h'(t),dt
          <Aint_{a}^c e^t,dt=Ae^c-Ae^a.$$

          Then
          $$h(c)<Ae^c-Ae^a+h(a)<Ae^c.$$
          Then $f(c)<A$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I don't see what you are bringing $c$ and $d$ into it. Let $cin(a,b)$.
          Then
          $$h(c)-h(a)=int_a^c h'(t),dt
          <Aint_{a}^c e^t,dt=Ae^c-Ae^a.$$

          Then
          $$h(c)<Ae^c-Ae^a+h(a)<Ae^c.$$
          Then $f(c)<A$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 20 '18 at 7:21









          Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown

          105k1160133




          105k1160133












          • $begingroup$
            my only worry here is given our definitions in the post $h$ might be defined at $a$?
            $endgroup$
            – user136920
            Dec 20 '18 at 7:42




















          • $begingroup$
            my only worry here is given our definitions in the post $h$ might be defined at $a$?
            $endgroup$
            – user136920
            Dec 20 '18 at 7:42


















          $begingroup$
          my only worry here is given our definitions in the post $h$ might be defined at $a$?
          $endgroup$
          – user136920
          Dec 20 '18 at 7:42






          $begingroup$
          my only worry here is given our definitions in the post $h$ might be defined at $a$?
          $endgroup$
          – user136920
          Dec 20 '18 at 7:42




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047252%2fshow-that-the-function-f-is-strictly-bounded-by-an-arbitrary-number-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

          Grease: Live!

          When does type information flow backwards in C++?