Is every separable locally compact metrizable topology induced by a Heine-Borel metric?












0












$begingroup$


This is a follow-up to my question here. A metric has the Heine-Borel property if a set is closed and bounded with respect to the metric if and only if it is compact. Now if a metrizable topology is induced by a metric with the Heine-Borel property, then it is locally compact and separable.



My question is, is the converse true? That is, if a topologicy is separable, locally compact, and metrizable, then is it induced by some metric with the Heine-Borel property?



If not, what is an example of such a topology all of whose metrics fail to have the Heine-Borel property?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    This is a follow-up to my question here. A metric has the Heine-Borel property if a set is closed and bounded with respect to the metric if and only if it is compact. Now if a metrizable topology is induced by a metric with the Heine-Borel property, then it is locally compact and separable.



    My question is, is the converse true? That is, if a topologicy is separable, locally compact, and metrizable, then is it induced by some metric with the Heine-Borel property?



    If not, what is an example of such a topology all of whose metrics fail to have the Heine-Borel property?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      This is a follow-up to my question here. A metric has the Heine-Borel property if a set is closed and bounded with respect to the metric if and only if it is compact. Now if a metrizable topology is induced by a metric with the Heine-Borel property, then it is locally compact and separable.



      My question is, is the converse true? That is, if a topologicy is separable, locally compact, and metrizable, then is it induced by some metric with the Heine-Borel property?



      If not, what is an example of such a topology all of whose metrics fail to have the Heine-Borel property?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      This is a follow-up to my question here. A metric has the Heine-Borel property if a set is closed and bounded with respect to the metric if and only if it is compact. Now if a metrizable topology is induced by a metric with the Heine-Borel property, then it is locally compact and separable.



      My question is, is the converse true? That is, if a topologicy is separable, locally compact, and metrizable, then is it induced by some metric with the Heine-Borel property?



      If not, what is an example of such a topology all of whose metrics fail to have the Heine-Borel property?







      general-topology metric-spaces compactness examples-counterexamples separable-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 20 '18 at 6:39









      Keshav SrinivasanKeshav Srinivasan

      2,33021445




      2,33021445






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Such a locally compact separable metric space has a one-point compactification $Y$ that is metrisable. This is classical and well-known. Let $d$ be a metric for $Y$, consider $X$ to be a subset of $Y$ with $Ysetminus X={infty}$ and define $d'(x_1, x_2) = d(x_1, x_2) + |frac{1}{d(x_1,infty)} - frac{1}{d(x_2,infty)}|$ for $x_1,x_2 in X$.



          One can check that $d$ is a compatible metric on $X$ such that $(X,d)$ has the Heine-Borel property. Boundedness implies that we "stay away from $infty$", essentially.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047238%2fis-every-separable-locally-compact-metrizable-topology-induced-by-a-heine-borel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Such a locally compact separable metric space has a one-point compactification $Y$ that is metrisable. This is classical and well-known. Let $d$ be a metric for $Y$, consider $X$ to be a subset of $Y$ with $Ysetminus X={infty}$ and define $d'(x_1, x_2) = d(x_1, x_2) + |frac{1}{d(x_1,infty)} - frac{1}{d(x_2,infty)}|$ for $x_1,x_2 in X$.



            One can check that $d$ is a compatible metric on $X$ such that $(X,d)$ has the Heine-Borel property. Boundedness implies that we "stay away from $infty$", essentially.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Such a locally compact separable metric space has a one-point compactification $Y$ that is metrisable. This is classical and well-known. Let $d$ be a metric for $Y$, consider $X$ to be a subset of $Y$ with $Ysetminus X={infty}$ and define $d'(x_1, x_2) = d(x_1, x_2) + |frac{1}{d(x_1,infty)} - frac{1}{d(x_2,infty)}|$ for $x_1,x_2 in X$.



              One can check that $d$ is a compatible metric on $X$ such that $(X,d)$ has the Heine-Borel property. Boundedness implies that we "stay away from $infty$", essentially.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Such a locally compact separable metric space has a one-point compactification $Y$ that is metrisable. This is classical and well-known. Let $d$ be a metric for $Y$, consider $X$ to be a subset of $Y$ with $Ysetminus X={infty}$ and define $d'(x_1, x_2) = d(x_1, x_2) + |frac{1}{d(x_1,infty)} - frac{1}{d(x_2,infty)}|$ for $x_1,x_2 in X$.



                One can check that $d$ is a compatible metric on $X$ such that $(X,d)$ has the Heine-Borel property. Boundedness implies that we "stay away from $infty$", essentially.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Such a locally compact separable metric space has a one-point compactification $Y$ that is metrisable. This is classical and well-known. Let $d$ be a metric for $Y$, consider $X$ to be a subset of $Y$ with $Ysetminus X={infty}$ and define $d'(x_1, x_2) = d(x_1, x_2) + |frac{1}{d(x_1,infty)} - frac{1}{d(x_2,infty)}|$ for $x_1,x_2 in X$.



                One can check that $d$ is a compatible metric on $X$ such that $(X,d)$ has the Heine-Borel property. Boundedness implies that we "stay away from $infty$", essentially.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 20 '18 at 7:07









                Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma

                111k348119




                111k348119






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047238%2fis-every-separable-locally-compact-metrizable-topology-induced-by-a-heine-borel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

                    Grease: Live!

                    When does type information flow backwards in C++?