Windows stalls when sending a SCP from Linux CentOS server v7.6 to Windows 10 client PC [on hold]
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Anyone experience a problem doing SCP of a 200Mb file from a CentOS server v7.6 kernel 4.19 to a Windows 10 i5 or i7 PC client laptop? Downstream only to PC. We see that Windows 10 client PC constricts the TCP/IP Window size and cannot handle the 200Mb downloads and stalls to a grinding halt. We tried PSCP and it works better but stalls sometimes, and on Ubuntu v14/16/18 it works fine consistently but not with CentOS? Anyone have any ideas? Using a 1G a Windows PC behind a wireless router going to/from a CentOS cloud server over a FIOS 1G fiber connection. THX
windows-10 scp centos-7 ubuntu-16.04 pscp
asked Dec 8 at 1:39
Greg Gum
1
put on hold as too broad by Scott, n8te, Burgi, bertieb, Pimp Juice IT Dec 15 at 3:59
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Anyone experience a problem doing SCP of a 200Mb file from a CentOS server v7.6 kernel 4.19 to a Windows 10 i5 or i7 PC client laptop? Downstream only to PC. We see that Windows 10 client PC constricts the TCP/IP Window size and cannot handle the 200Mb downloads and stalls to a grinding halt. We tried PSCP and it works better but stalls sometimes, and on Ubuntu v14/16/18 it works fine consistently but not with CentOS? Anyone have any ideas? Using a 1G a Windows PC behind a wireless router going to/from a CentOS cloud server over a FIOS 1G fiber connection. THX
windows-10 scp centos-7 ubuntu-16.04 pscp
asked Dec 8 at 1:39
Greg Gum
1
put on hold as too broad by Scott, n8te, Burgi, bertieb, Pimp Juice IT Dec 15 at 3:59
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Consider usingscp -vto add some information to your post. Do you know at what percentage it stalls, is it near to 100%?
– harrymc
Dec 8 at 18:38
If you're having trouble getting scp to run reliably, see if you can use rsync instead. With rsync, if you have to restart the transfer it'll pick up where it left off.
– Kenster
Dec 8 at 21:12
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Anyone experience a problem doing SCP of a 200Mb file from a CentOS server v7.6 kernel 4.19 to a Windows 10 i5 or i7 PC client laptop? Downstream only to PC. We see that Windows 10 client PC constricts the TCP/IP Window size and cannot handle the 200Mb downloads and stalls to a grinding halt. We tried PSCP and it works better but stalls sometimes, and on Ubuntu v14/16/18 it works fine consistently but not with CentOS? Anyone have any ideas? Using a 1G a Windows PC behind a wireless router going to/from a CentOS cloud server over a FIOS 1G fiber connection. THX
windows-10 scp centos-7 ubuntu-16.04 pscp
asked Dec 8 at 1:39
Greg Gum
1
Anyone experience a problem doing SCP of a 200Mb file from a CentOS server v7.6 kernel 4.19 to a Windows 10 i5 or i7 PC client laptop? Downstream only to PC. We see that Windows 10 client PC constricts the TCP/IP Window size and cannot handle the 200Mb downloads and stalls to a grinding halt. We tried PSCP and it works better but stalls sometimes, and on Ubuntu v14/16/18 it works fine consistently but not with CentOS? Anyone have any ideas? Using a 1G a Windows PC behind a wireless router going to/from a CentOS cloud server over a FIOS 1G fiber connection. THX
windows-10 scp centos-7 ubuntu-16.04 pscp
windows-10 scp centos-7 ubuntu-16.04 pscp
asked Dec 8 at 1:39
Greg Gum
1
asked Dec 8 at 1:39
Greg Gum
1
asked Dec 8 at 1:39
Greg Gum
1
asked Dec 8 at 1:39
Greg Gum
1
asked Dec 8 at 1:39
Greg Gum
1
1
put on hold as too broad by Scott, n8te, Burgi, bertieb, Pimp Juice IT Dec 15 at 3:59
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as too broad by Scott, n8te, Burgi, bertieb, Pimp Juice IT Dec 15 at 3:59
Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Consider usingscp -vto add some information to your post. Do you know at what percentage it stalls, is it near to 100%?
– harrymc
Dec 8 at 18:38
If you're having trouble getting scp to run reliably, see if you can use rsync instead. With rsync, if you have to restart the transfer it'll pick up where it left off.
– Kenster
Dec 8 at 21:12
add a comment |
Consider usingscp -vto add some information to your post. Do you know at what percentage it stalls, is it near to 100%?
– harrymc
Dec 8 at 18:38
If you're having trouble getting scp to run reliably, see if you can use rsync instead. With rsync, if you have to restart the transfer it'll pick up where it left off.
– Kenster
Dec 8 at 21:12
Consider using
scp -v to add some information to your post. Do you know at what percentage it stalls, is it near to 100%?– harrymc
Dec 8 at 18:38
Consider using
scp -v to add some information to your post. Do you know at what percentage it stalls, is it near to 100%?– harrymc
Dec 8 at 18:38
If you're having trouble getting scp to run reliably, see if you can use rsync instead. With rsync, if you have to restart the transfer it'll pick up where it left off.
– Kenster
Dec 8 at 21:12
If you're having trouble getting scp to run reliably, see if you can use rsync instead. With rsync, if you have to restart the transfer it'll pick up where it left off.
– Kenster
Dec 8 at 21:12
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Consider using
scp -vto add some information to your post. Do you know at what percentage it stalls, is it near to 100%?– harrymc
Dec 8 at 18:38
If you're having trouble getting scp to run reliably, see if you can use rsync instead. With rsync, if you have to restart the transfer it'll pick up where it left off.
– Kenster
Dec 8 at 21:12