Are antilinear forms part of the tensor algebra of a $mathbb{C}$-vector field?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional vector space over some field $K$, $V^*$ be its dual and $mathcal{T}(V)$ be its tensor algebra. If $K$ is either $mathbb{R}$ or $mathbb{C}$, then every multilinear form



$$Vtimescdotstimes V times V^*timescdotstimes V^* longrightarrow K$$



can be canonically identified with one element of $mathcal{T}(V)$ (and one element only).



If we consider $K=mathbb{C}$, though, no element of $mathcal{T}(V)$ can be identified with an antilinear operator, sesquilinear form or any application that's antilinear with respect to some variables (and linear for the rest of them), right?



If so, can the tensor algebra of $V$ be extended so that it also contains tensors canonically identifiable with those?, how?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Maybe something semilinear.
    – Ricardo Buring
    Nov 18 at 22:38










  • If you have a scalar product you can identify $V$ with the space of anti-linear forms. Alternatively call $overline{V}$ the "anti-linear dual" and note that anti-linear forms are of the form $overline{V}times..times overline{V}times overline{V}^*times...timesoverline V^*to K$.
    – s.harp
    Nov 21 at 10:27

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional vector space over some field $K$, $V^*$ be its dual and $mathcal{T}(V)$ be its tensor algebra. If $K$ is either $mathbb{R}$ or $mathbb{C}$, then every multilinear form



$$Vtimescdotstimes V times V^*timescdotstimes V^* longrightarrow K$$



can be canonically identified with one element of $mathcal{T}(V)$ (and one element only).



If we consider $K=mathbb{C}$, though, no element of $mathcal{T}(V)$ can be identified with an antilinear operator, sesquilinear form or any application that's antilinear with respect to some variables (and linear for the rest of them), right?



If so, can the tensor algebra of $V$ be extended so that it also contains tensors canonically identifiable with those?, how?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Maybe something semilinear.
    – Ricardo Buring
    Nov 18 at 22:38










  • If you have a scalar product you can identify $V$ with the space of anti-linear forms. Alternatively call $overline{V}$ the "anti-linear dual" and note that anti-linear forms are of the form $overline{V}times..times overline{V}times overline{V}^*times...timesoverline V^*to K$.
    – s.harp
    Nov 21 at 10:27















up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional vector space over some field $K$, $V^*$ be its dual and $mathcal{T}(V)$ be its tensor algebra. If $K$ is either $mathbb{R}$ or $mathbb{C}$, then every multilinear form



$$Vtimescdotstimes V times V^*timescdotstimes V^* longrightarrow K$$



can be canonically identified with one element of $mathcal{T}(V)$ (and one element only).



If we consider $K=mathbb{C}$, though, no element of $mathcal{T}(V)$ can be identified with an antilinear operator, sesquilinear form or any application that's antilinear with respect to some variables (and linear for the rest of them), right?



If so, can the tensor algebra of $V$ be extended so that it also contains tensors canonically identifiable with those?, how?










share|cite|improve this question













Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional vector space over some field $K$, $V^*$ be its dual and $mathcal{T}(V)$ be its tensor algebra. If $K$ is either $mathbb{R}$ or $mathbb{C}$, then every multilinear form



$$Vtimescdotstimes V times V^*timescdotstimes V^* longrightarrow K$$



can be canonically identified with one element of $mathcal{T}(V)$ (and one element only).



If we consider $K=mathbb{C}$, though, no element of $mathcal{T}(V)$ can be identified with an antilinear operator, sesquilinear form or any application that's antilinear with respect to some variables (and linear for the rest of them), right?



If so, can the tensor algebra of $V$ be extended so that it also contains tensors canonically identifiable with those?, how?







complex-numbers tensor-products multilinear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 16 at 20:35









TeicDaun

7116




7116












  • Maybe something semilinear.
    – Ricardo Buring
    Nov 18 at 22:38










  • If you have a scalar product you can identify $V$ with the space of anti-linear forms. Alternatively call $overline{V}$ the "anti-linear dual" and note that anti-linear forms are of the form $overline{V}times..times overline{V}times overline{V}^*times...timesoverline V^*to K$.
    – s.harp
    Nov 21 at 10:27




















  • Maybe something semilinear.
    – Ricardo Buring
    Nov 18 at 22:38










  • If you have a scalar product you can identify $V$ with the space of anti-linear forms. Alternatively call $overline{V}$ the "anti-linear dual" and note that anti-linear forms are of the form $overline{V}times..times overline{V}times overline{V}^*times...timesoverline V^*to K$.
    – s.harp
    Nov 21 at 10:27


















Maybe something semilinear.
– Ricardo Buring
Nov 18 at 22:38




Maybe something semilinear.
– Ricardo Buring
Nov 18 at 22:38












If you have a scalar product you can identify $V$ with the space of anti-linear forms. Alternatively call $overline{V}$ the "anti-linear dual" and note that anti-linear forms are of the form $overline{V}times..times overline{V}times overline{V}^*times...timesoverline V^*to K$.
– s.harp
Nov 21 at 10:27






If you have a scalar product you can identify $V$ with the space of anti-linear forms. Alternatively call $overline{V}$ the "anti-linear dual" and note that anti-linear forms are of the form $overline{V}times..times overline{V}times overline{V}^*times...timesoverline V^*to K$.
– s.harp
Nov 21 at 10:27

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001610%2fare-antilinear-forms-part-of-the-tensor-algebra-of-a-mathbbc-vector-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001610%2fare-antilinear-forms-part-of-the-tensor-algebra-of-a-mathbbc-vector-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How do I know what Microsoft account the skydrive app is syncing to?

Grease: Live!

When does type information flow backwards in C++?